User talk:Faren29

April 2016

Hello, I'm Bahudhara. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Yellowstone Caldera, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bahudhara (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits on VY Canis Majoris

I reverted again your edits on VY Canis Majoris because you keep removing the 2,000 R_☉ value for VY CMa, stating that it is deprecated (and also I see no where the paper says it is deprecated) and is really based on Humphreys papers. This 2,000 R_☉ for VY CMa is just an average of the Wittkowski radius and a radius of 3,000 R_☉. You even said that Wittkowski told you that VY CMa is not bigger than the radius that estimated it. Ok but despite this, this is not a reliable reference (like what Lithopsian told you about this edit on UY Sct). Besides, The 1,420 value for VY CMa is not necessarily the true size of the star but just an improved estimate and also the size of VY CMa is still uncertain as it is a variable star, so its size varies and also its real upper estimate is not known too. So it is better to keep the Kaminski radius for VY CMa since its size varies. Please stop these edits before being engaged in an edit war. Thanks. ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 11:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s the thing, putting together an accurate measurement and an obsolete measurement is just a big fat no in my book. Wittkowski himself has told me that VY Canis Majoris is no larger than what he measured it to be. Larger estimates of the radius are based on earlier distance estimates and do not refer to the photospheric radius but to more extended layers around the star. VY Canis Majoris is not the largest star known, but it is certainly one of the largest. I have edited back the page for the last time. Faren29 (talk) 23:55, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

VY CMa varies by a factor of 17, and thus assuming that the brightness of 270,000 (or 310,000) L_☉ is the maximum brightness of the star, that means the minimum brightness is only 178,000 (or 204,000) L_☉ and since the mass loss of the star is very high and thus the luminosity too (probably over 250,000 L_☉), this value would be probably too low for a red hypergiant with such a huge mass loss. Therefore, the maximum brightness of VY CMa is probably higher than what Wittkoswki calculated (but probably below 360,000 L_☉ based on modern distances) and thus the maximum radius could be larger than Wittkowski's radius although it is unlikely to be 2,500-3,000 R_☉ like what Humphreys said.

But even worse here because I have no idea why you claim UY Scuti as the real largest star even though the 1708 value is considered dubious and unlikely since it was based on a highly old distance. If the estimated size for the star is very uncertain and dubious, then the star cannot be considered as the largest known star (even Lithopsian said so, as he did with the 1,750-2,440 R_☉ value for MY Cephei). Besides, the size of most red supergiants, including VY CMa and even UY Sct, varies so it cannot be sure that UY Sct is the largest star (and do you believe a star could be larger than the largest star???????). So it's better to say that it is simply one of the largest stars. Also where you said you emailed Alcolea ok but for the last time it is not reliable (see above). Please stop doing this before being engaged in an edit war. Thanks. ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 08:58, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Orders of magnitude (length), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 09:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thrilla in Manila promotional poster.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thrilla in Manila poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thrilla in Manila poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thrilla in Manila promotional poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thrilla in Manila promotional poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Joshua vs. Jarrell Miller moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anthony Joshua vs. Jarrell Miller, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Joshua vs. Jarrell Miller (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Joshua vs. Jarrell Miller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anthony Joshua vs. Jarrell Miller, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:37, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

M87

There are standards on the sizes of images in articles, please do not override them. See WP:IMGSIZE and MOS:IMGSIZE. The reason a cropped image was placed in the article was to bring up the useful part of the image, rather than hide it in a sea of black. Tarl N. (discuss) 01:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of highest-grossing openings for films. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Betty Logan (talk) 14:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua II moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua II, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:44, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you create a second article?-Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua II

This first one was moved to the draftspace for a reason-because there isn't any sourcing. Why are you trying to go around the AfC process when still pending review? Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created a second article because it states that review might take up to 8 weeks. This is a much quicker way and I've started to source my content on this second page. Faren29 (talk) 19:36, 16 August 2019 (BST)

1) It actually rarely takes more than a few days. 2) You should've put the work in on the draft, being impatient is not a particularly good excuse for going around the AfC process, especially after User:discospinster thought it was more prudent to go there. GPL93 (talk) 19:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is so, then the article can be deleted while I transfer the work of the article onto the draft while it awaits confirmation. Faren29 (talk) 19:36, 16 August 2019 (BST)

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua II

A tag has been placed on Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No sourcing, possible copyvio with the photo. This article was already draftified by another editor due to having no sources and then author appears to have decided to go around the AfC process instead of actually fixing the issues that caused the article to be moved to the draftspace.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 19:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua II.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andy Ruiz Jr. vs. Anthony Joshua II.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KSI vs. Logan Paul page title

Hi, is there a MoS you can direct me to providing details on boxing fights always being stylized "II"? Cheers TheMasterGuru (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Check every single page for a boxing rematch and the number will always be stylised in roman numerals. Your welcome :) User:Faren29 (talk) 17:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to UFC 246, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Not yet named - pls wait CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I noticed that you recently removed content from Deontay Wilder vs. Tyson Fury II without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell

Hello, Faren29. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 20:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua vs. Pulev

Your edit has been reverted per WP:NOTSPECULATION. Firstly, you provided no explanation. Secondly, the most reliable source as of right now is DAZN, a network that will air the fight. See Eddie Hearn’s latest comments here. – ².O.^Boxing 02:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of large volcanic eruptions of the 19th century, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Space Barnstar
		For maintaining the list of largest stars and your significant contributions to articles on supergiant stars! Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 05:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Your edit to 2021 eruption of La Soufrière has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 02:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of large volcanic eruptions of the 20th century, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Suoh and Katla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 268

Hi, Pls note that when UFC.com event page indicate the event name officially, then we would recorded it in the event page, until then, pls wait. Cassiopeia^(talk) 05:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manny Pacquiao vs. Errol Spence Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julio Ceja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pacquiao Spence Official Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pacquiao Spence Official Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I moved an article of yours to draftspace

I moved Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk to Draft:Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk as there aren't any references, making it unsuitable for mainspace. I recommend you wait until there's confirmation of a deal before moving it back (after adding references). – ².O.^Boxing 20:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of George Kambosos Jr. vs. Devin Haney

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on George Kambosos Jr. vs. Devin Haney, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ––FormalDude talk 05:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:George Kambosos Jr. vs. Devin Haney.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:George Kambosos Jr. vs. Devin Haney.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC 277. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 03:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephenson 2-18

Thank you for expanding the article much. It has become very detailed (maybe a bit too detailed) so the article is very good now. This is actually, in my opinion, the ideal version of the star's article. Thanks! --The Space Enthusiast (talk) 11:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) Faren29 17:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tip for black hole comparison

The comparison you've made in Phoenix Cluster is still way off by almost two times. If you wanted to have a guide here is a comparison of TON 618 with an approximate Solar System boundary of 80 AU. SkyFlubbler (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mass loss of St2-18

I noticed that there is a value of mass loss on the article for that star but where did you specifically get it?—The Space Enthusiast (talk) 01:18, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Table 8 of Fok et al. (2012). Faren29 (talk) 19:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jake Paul. You have been warned about not using references before, you can't update content about future fights without the support of reliable sources. TylerBurden (talk) 13:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly referenced? The fight was just announced. Faren29 (talk) 16:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So where was your reference when you edited the article? You do know that you have to include it in the actual article right? You can't just go and change something just because it was announced, Wikipedia is built on WP:VERIFY. TylerBurden (talk) 16:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jake Paul. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Now you did it again, I do not see any reference in your edit despite being previously warned. TylerBurden (talk) 02:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Monarchy of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. You changed something that was quoted directly from the source in quotation marks. DrKay (talk) 06:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Hello, Faren29. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on upcoming fights in record tables

Greetings. You are invited to participate in an RfC on whether to include or omit upcoming fights in professional boxing record tables. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A recent edit of yours

A word of advice. I'd very strongly advise you to self-revert this edit. [1] It is grossly inappropriate to remove other peoples responses to an RfC, and changing the wording substantively after after it has been responded to is rarely legitimate. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was advised to shorten my comment because it was too long. What I removed wasn’t a response to my RfC but an unsigned comment at the top of my RfC that added nothing to what I originally said. Faren29 (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed responses to the RfC by ActivelyDisinterested, Grumpylawnchair, Mac Dreamstate and RonSigPi. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only just noticed. That’s my mistake. Apologies. Faren29 (talk) 20:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jon Jones, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 04:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All five of those sources, including the one quoting Dana White, next to the sentence opine that Jones is the greatest of all time. Faren29 (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Jones

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cassiopeia talk 08:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2024 UEFA Euro final programme.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2024 UEFA Euro final programme.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]