Jump to content

User talk:FanniSomlyai (OSA)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, FanniSomlyai (OSA), and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:12, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Verzió International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival (July 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:12, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, FanniSomlyai (OSA)! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:12, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Verzió International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of the draft is currently not supported by reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 23:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Verzió International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival (July 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clearfrienda 💬 14:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

[edit]
Information icon

Hello FanniSomlyai (OSA). The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Verzió International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:FanniSomlyai (OSA). The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FanniSomlyai (OSA)|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DoubleGarzing,
Thank you for your feedback on this article.
I am not paid for the article. However, I am related to the organization which is why I registered by the name "Fanni Somlyai (OSA)".
The article has already a few times received a feedback of not having enough secondary sources as references, however, all of these references are from magazines, newspapers, etc. as it was required by editors before:
http://www.filmkultura.hu/regi/2008/articles/profiles/zadori.hu.html
https://filmkultura.hu/regi/2005/articles/reviews/verzio2.hu.html FanniSomlyai (OSA) (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(continuing my reply here, as I hit enter by mistake)
http://beszelo.c3.hu/cikkek/%E2%80%9Eicipicit-igazitottak-a-vilagon%E2%80%9D FanniSomlyai (OSA) (talk) 10:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your quick response. Even if you're not explicitly paid to edit this article, since you are employed by an organisation connected to the subject, that still very much counts as paid editing. Please make the necessary formal disclosure now before any further editing. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Please make the necessary formal disclosure now before any further editing."
Can you please help me how to do that?
The organization's name is already included in the user name, what else could be done? FanniSomlyai (OSA) (talk) 10:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't enough to mention the organisation's name in your username, you must make an express formal declaration on your user page. The original message in this thread provides instructions for doing that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you, I'll try to include that declaration. FanniSomlyai (OSA) (talk) 10:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am getting back to you regarding a question about the edits of this article. You asked me previously to add a disclosure to my user page that I am related to the organization of which the article is about: I have done that now on my user page. I have also got another question connected to this: when creating this page, we were informed that Wikipedia pages about GLAM institutions' collections, objects, and activities can be edited by staff members of the mentioned organizations and this complies with Wikipedia's editing rule, because such pages are contributions about culturally significant objects, phemomenon, events, etc. I used to create this article with this knowledge too. Could you please reflect on this question please? FanniSomlyai (OSA) (talk) 10:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://cafebabel.com/en/article/documentary-as-a-tool-of-change-verzio-international-human-rights-documentary-film-festival-5ae00b71f723b35a145e783d/
When drafting the article, I attempted to follow the format of other Wikipedia articles on a similar topic to this one (film festivals) to help me structure the content. Such as this page, for example: International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam. From my point of view, this latter article is very similar to my draft in content, structure, references, links, etc. Could you advise me what you see as the main point of difference between this article and my draft, and what are the spots that could still be improved, please? The only advice I have received so far is to use secondary sources as references, however, all of these links that I included in my reply are secondary sources, so I am lost at this point as to what could still be wrong.
Thank you for your support. FanniSomlyai (OSA) (talk) 10:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The FilmKultura source doesn't work. The Cafe Babel may be a secondary source, but the article in question is an interview, which makes it primary. I'm not sure about the Beszelo one, I have doubts about its reliability and independence, but in any case it alone isn't enough.
As for comparing this draft with other articles that may exist, that is a red herring, as drafts are not judged in comparison to other articles, but rather by reference to the currently applicable guidelines and policies. You may have noticed that the IDFFA article has been flagged as being inadequately referenced, so it certainly is not something you want to model yours after. If you wish to follow the lead of other articles, you should only look at ones that have been assessed as 'good articles'. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have just checked now, and it doesn't work for me either - but I think it must be some temporary error. Filmkultúra is major, reliable film magazine (these articles cited here are the digitized versions of older articles). It should be fine as a source, I hope their website will come back to life soon.
Thank you very much for the "good articles" link. I have checked one, here: Albania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2011 and it also looks very similar to me in terms of content, structure, and links. FanniSomlyai (OSA) (talk) 10:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Verzió International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival (April 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is still almost entirely supported by primary sources, routine business reporting, interviews, etc., none of which can be used to establish notability. We need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources such as newspapers, magazines, TV or radio programmes, books by reputable publishers, etc.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Verzió International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival

[edit]

Information icon Hello, FanniSomlyai (OSA). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Verzió International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FanniSomlyai_(OSA)&oldid=1226065735"