User talk:Fabiarslan

This is Fabiarslan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahalka, Meerut (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahalka, Meerut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabiarslan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Attack on Fatima's house have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Attack on Fatima's house was changed by Fabiarslan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87682 on 2023-07-07T06:42:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fabiarslan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Attack on Fatima's house that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:2268:8F04:B02C:89FF:FE20:9805 (talk) 07:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Zaira Wasim, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 06:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabiarslan, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as 49.15.242.51 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 18:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Babar Azam. Materialscientist (talk) 04:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahalka, Meerut (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MPGuy2824 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

consider adding a reference to the population from the official indian census site.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahalka, Meerut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have also given links about this in externel and refrence in this article, in which there is also a link to abp news and also to Hindi Wikipedia, then how will this be accepted ? Fabiha Arslan (talk) 05:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Additionally, please do not add your name/signatures to articles. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fabiarslan!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fabiarslan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't know that we can't use multiple accounts on Wikipedia, but since I found out, I haven't created any other account, so please unblock me, I'll take care in the future, thanks Fabiha Arslan (talk) 02:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, that's sort of meaningless, as a) you've only been blocked in the last 24 hours and b) we usually block the ability to create accounts in this situation anyway. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fabiha Arslan (talk) 02:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So...you thought that the way of getting around an indefinite block that was applied to you was to create another account? So you created User:Arslan8266 a day after being blocked indefinitely [1] and that gets blocked. You create User:ArslanSultan2 [2] and that gets blocked. You create User:AryanDigital [3] and that gets blocked. Then you create this account and that gets blocked too. And now you're trying to claim you didn't know? If that were how things worked around here, blocks and the policies that lead to blocks would be meaningless. At this point, you are community banned per WP:THREESTRIKES. I.e., an administrator can not unilaterally unblock you on any of your accounts. It will take a community discussion reaching consensus to unblock you to do so. You have dramatically overstayed your welcome here. Any further attempts to write your autobiography here will fail. Please find some other website willing to host your autobiography. Wikipedia isn't it. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, from now on I will not do such activities on Wikipedia, but now you can unblock my account, give me a chance to stay on Wikipedia Fabiha Arslan (talk) 23:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And despite your protestations above, you continued using another sockpuppet even after your unblock request on this sockpuppet. User:Fabihaansari has been blocked. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me Please

Okay, from now on I will not do such activities on Wikipedia, but now you can unblock my account, give me a chance to stay on Wikipedia.org Fabiha Arslan (talk) 23:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've reformatted what you did because you need to carefully consider what it is you are doing. You need to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Appeals_of_bans_imposed_by_the_community in order to be unbanned. If you place such an appeal here, I will dutifully place it at WP:AN/I for the community to consider the unban appeal. However, I advise against doing so. Despite many warnings, you continued to use sockpuppets even after you claimed you wouldn't do so. You've tried to claim you didn't know that this was a problem, despite making multiple sockpuppet accounts over the last year. It is quite clear you did in fact know what you were doing, and kept on violating our policies anyway. You have attempted to create a biography about yourself many, many times under different article and draft names. Such attempts have all been deleted. Nevertheless, you kept trying to make an autobiography about yourself. Over and over again you've been told what to do and didn't do it, or have been told what NOT to do and done it anyway. Were you to make such an appeal I would, as I said, post it to WP:AN/I, but then follow it up with a recommendation NOT to approve unblocking. I have no reason to believe you will not return to the behaviors that got you blocked in the first place. In my opinion, your best path forward is to wait six months, make the appeal on User talk:Iarsalanansari, and lay out in clear, unequivocal terms what it is you intend to do on the project, and affirm that you will not make any more attempts to write an autobiography about yourself. This is per Wikipedia:Standard offer. I would also stop making claims you are an author and doctor. In the former case, unless you actually have books published and available for purchase somewhere, no one's going to believe it. In the latter case, I find it highly unlikely you have ever received a Doctor of Medicine degree, as various statements you have made elsewhere have hinted at. If you want to appear to be credible in such an unban appeal, acting in ways that lead people to believe you are credible makes a difference. Making unsupported claims of your own fame do not help. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft: In case you didn’t see, it appears they also attempted logged out editing, here. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]