User talk:Ezlev/Archives/2021/March

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,837		Kellyanne Conway (talk)	Add sources
87		Berkeley High School (California) (talk)	Add sources
43		Delfzijl (talk)	Add sources
147		2021 Dutch curfew riots (talk)	Add sources
22		Jerusalem gay pride parade (talk)	Add sources
5		Guadalajara Gay Pride (talk)	Add sources
27		Gay media (talk)	Cleanup
176		History of gay men in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
176		Kamehameha Schools (talk)	Cleanup
4		Ende Gelände 2016 (talk)	Expand
79		Rybka (talk)	Expand
65		LGBTQ migration (talk)	Expand
1,226		Civil disobedience (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
61		Parable of the Poisoned Arrow (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
73		Healthcare and the LGBT community (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
76		Individual and political action on climate change (talk)	Merge
1,688		Alt-right (talk)	Merge
2,869		LGBT symbols (talk)	Merge
4		New Words Bookstore (talk)	Wikify
155		Travis Beacham (talk)	Wikify
3		LGBT in Guatemala (talk)	Wikify
2		Les Nickelettes (talk)	Orphan
2		Paperstorm (talk)	Orphan
28		Priya Davidar (talk)	Orphan
17		Utopian Community of Modern Times (talk)	Stub
42		LGBT rights organization (talk)	Stub
9		HC Oranje-Rood (talk)	Stub
3		Ende Gelände 2020 (talk)	Stub
28		Stapleton Colony (talk)	Stub
119		Microsoft Academic (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment, and at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment, and at Talk:Second Libyan Civil War on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Talk:South ParQ Vaccination Special on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tillie Kottmann

The article Tillie Kottmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Case of WP:BLPCRIME, since not being a Public Figure the accusation needs to be removed. After the removal she lacks WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

CommanderWaterford, I've removed the tag, please see my edit summary. Also, please note that Kottmann uses they/them pronouns. ezlev.^talk 19:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tillie Kottmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

• New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
• 1Lib1Ref
• Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Info about Jack Turban at article Irreversible Damage

Hi I just want to find out reason for deleting Jack Turban current education status. https://profiles.stanford.edu/jack-turban https://www.jackturban.com/

Please help me to understand. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PseudonymhelpU2 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC) (Moved to new talk page section and titled by ezlev.^talk 19:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC))

PseudonymhelpU2, thanks for asking! I reverted that edit because it was synthesis, which is what it's called when someone combines material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. In this case, the edit took something which was not mentioned in the sources related to Irreversible Damage but was mentioned in sources related to Jack Turban, and combined it with the source that was in the article (Jack Turban's criticism of Irreversible Damage) to imply certain things about how credible that criticism is. That isn't really done on Wikipedia, because in addition to violating the part about synthesis in the policy no original research, it also usually doesn't adhere to a neutral point of view. I hope this is helpful - I'll ping SreySros here, who reverted your edit before I did, so she can tell us if I missed anything (if she wants). And if you've got any more questions, feel free to ask them here! ezlev.^talk 20:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

PseudonymhelpU2, Ezlev pretty much summed up why I reverted your original edit. I apologize if my edit summary ("SYNTH, not a RS") was too short to be helpful. Generally if you see people using all-caps words on Wikipedia you can pop a "WP:" in front of them and find the relevant page (WP:RS, WP:SYNTH, etc.). Aside from the synthesis, original research, and neutral point of view issues with your edits, "Uncommon Ground Media" is not a reliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SreySros (talk • contribs)

In addition, Target has NOT resale the book. I just confirmed. PseudonymhelpU2 (talk) 22:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@PseudonymhelpU2: do you have a source for that info? ezlev.^talk 22:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I googled and searched in Target website for many days and can't find it PseudonymhelpU2 (talk) 00:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

I tried to put on CBN news link but I can't PseudonymhelpU2 (talk) 00:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

@ezlev Thank you for deleted the update. I want to ask if CBN news can be a source and the fact when searching for the book on Target web site, one can not find the book. Thank you for your help. PseudonymhelpU2 (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

PseudonymhelpU2, I don't think CBN News is a very reliable source, and saying that the book isn't available because it doesn't show up in search on the Target website would be original research again. ezlev.^talk 17:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC Decline: Banking in Guyana

Hi, I see you declined the article "Banking in Guyana" for sounding like an essay. I'm a bit concerned because, honestly, I am a very poor essayist. I would still like to improve this article because developing countries have interesting economies, even if they're eclipsed by their colonial predecessors. If you have the time to explain what would be needed to make a suitable article on this topic, please let me know. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 22:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Estheim, I completely agree with you that this draft should be an article on Wikipedia. Underrepresentation of developing countries is a big problem here. I also want to apologize for not leaving a more detailed reason for the decline - you're the second person to give me that feedback today, and I'll definitely keep it in mind in the future. The main reason I didn't accept this AfC submission was the lede, which is generally supposed to summarize the article, but in this case reads more like the introduction of an essay and introduces unsourced ideas that aren't supported in the body of the article. I think improving the lede (WP:LEDE might help) would make a big difference. ezlev.^talk 22:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)