Jump to content

User talk:Exemplo347/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Promo Edits

Hi Exemplo347, may I know why you deleted the things I edited on HappyFresh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anisahdpt (talk • contribs) 10:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

@Anisahdpt: Of course. The article in question contained a large amount of promotional content, in PR-style language. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and articles should be written in a style that does not serve to promote companies. Please read WP:COI for more information. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 10:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Help with sockpuppet edits

Hi, a suspected sockpuppet IP user is going around removing sourced content. Examples: Nam Joo-hyuk, Ryu Jun-yeol. I do not want to engage in a edit war, so please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:E800:E610:1D5:E817:CD4A:A8F8:65E (talk) 13:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your deletions of my images

I'm disappointed that you acted before I'd had a chance to respond. I DO own all of those images. I personally know the person in those pictures, I took the pictures of him, and I created the memes for the ones that have been memed. The fact that a couple of the images were turned into memes doesn't change at all the fact that they were all relevant to the pages on which I posted them and, with the captions I added, enhanced the pages on which they were posted. The one illustrated cyber humiliation, which is an important facet of erotic humiliation that was not amply addressed on that page. The second illustrated the lifestyle of a "sissy maid" on a feminization page that talks about sissy maids but didn't connect the dress-up aspect of the lifestyle to public outings, which are an important part of it, until I added my photo. And the third was an actual example of a picture that can be found on the People Of Walmart website and is illustrative of the pictures visitors to that site will find. I don't want to get into a spat because I'm new to all of this Wikipedia editing stuff, but I'm going to trust now that you know I do in fact own the copyrights to these and many other pictures of this guy that you won't interfere with my adding them to pages so long as they are actually relevant to the topic of the pages. Is that a fair assumption?

Dom Vadar (talk) 01:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Examplo347 is not an administrator. Probably those images were deleted because they're non-free or copied/pasted from an website. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 01:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Those images were deleted from Wikimedia Commons (not by me) because they were uploaded without the correct copyright information that proved you own them - they can't just take your word for it. Head on over to Wikimedia Commons and ask the administrator who deleted them how you should proceed. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 06:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Babangida Kabiru Ruma

Prince011 (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)I am here by to discuss about my page Babangida Kabiru Ruma which was tagged by deletion, i have made several edition on the page kindly take a look or perhaps give me a tips on which article should be on wikipedia. thanks you Prince011 (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

The correct venue to discuss the proposed deletion of your article is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babangida Kabiru Ruma. Frankly, there are no improvements that can be made - the subject of your article (who I believe to be YOU) does not meet the General Notability Guidelines. Can I also point out that if you delete anything from that discussion page, you may lose your editing privileges. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your repeated detection and rapid tagging of G10 attack pages. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

I was not trying to be malicious in anyway. Originally my user name was PaeDae Entertainment but then i changed it to Brenon of PaeDae Entertainment because it violated the terms of a username. Then i changed it to Ty Bricksdale because apparently it still violated. That's why i have multiple accounts. I was in no way trying to violate any rules. I didn't know how to change the user name so i just made a new account. I'm sorry for any inconvenience i caused. If you can make the edits i made visible it will be greatly appreciated. Have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ty Bricksdale (talk • contribs) 02:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

@Ty Bricksdale: Greetings. Any comments regarding the Sockpuppet investigation I initiated should be posted under the Comments by other users section of this page. As for the article, it has been deleted following an Article for Deletion discussion and, if recreated, it may be subject to speedy deletion under This Criteria. As you can see at the top of the discussion page, the administrator who deleted your article is @Samwalton9: - this is who you should contact with any further queries. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 11:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

talk:Articles for deletion/Twice as Nice

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I don't understand why you are trying to delete this article. You've stated they don't meet notability standards but they are GRAMMY NOMINATED in 3 categories and have produced multiple top-10 singles across the United States, Australia, the UK, New Zealand, Italy and more. This is not gaining notability through "working with a famous person", this is publishing with recognised musical artists and in many cases Grammy award winning artists. By your logic EVERY SINGLE MUSIC PRODUCER with an article on wiki would need to have their page deleted. What is your issue with this page? (Haydon.h. (talk) 00:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC))

Greetings. The proper venue for this discussion is here. If you plan on posting on the talk page of everyone who comments during the deletion discussion you're going to find yourself warned for disruptive editing. My Talk page is not the place for you to discuss this. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


OK, my apologies, i did not mean to misuse the talk page. Can you help me with the article though? What types of sources do i need to insert to prevent it from being deleted? (Haydon.h. (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC))

My only comment on this issue (other than at the page I've directed you to) will be to say that any sources should be about Twice as Nice - not about people they work with. There isn't a single source in that article that is about the company "Twice as Nice" - some of them don't even mention the company. That's my final word on it here - as I've said, this isn't the appropriate venue for this discussion. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Just FYI

I see that you've been involved in cleaning up after RaySingh, so I just wanted to let you know I've just added his name to this SPI for a long-time sockpuppeteer. I've suspected it was the same person, and the hijacking of Muslim Educational Trust was yet another similarity to how previous socks have behaved. Anyway, we'll see what the SPI finds out. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 16:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

@Bonadea: Damn, my stealthy clean-ups keep getting me noticed! I was about to report him to AN/I for the repeated attempts to hijack pages, but the SPI makes more sense. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Well, they are good stealthy clean-ups. Though, I guess, if a stealthy clean-up gets you noticed, is it in fact stealthy? If a tree falls in the forest and nobody writes an article about it, does it exist? So many questions! :-) --bonadea contributions talk 17:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Comment

Please stop spamming my page with unnecessary content. Direct questions could have been asked. Also I am improving comments so they are being replied to not disrupting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny578 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

@Danny578: The warnings you've been given aren't spam and aren't unnecessary. If you ignore them you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove content from Articles for Deletion discussions and do not edit other editors' comments. I suggest you pay attention to the warnings. Exemplo347 (talk) 23:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

A tip re: talk pages

Hello!

You don't need to @ a user when you're on their talk page. They'll get notified automatically!

...That's it. Just FYI.

MereTechnicality (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I know - in that particular case I wanted to draw the editor's attention to something that was more important than the usual talk-page guff they get bombarded with! Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 02:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Okay! Just making sure you know. Have a good evening! MereTechnicality (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Exemplo347 reported by User:Dharmadhyaksha (Result: ). Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

How silly. Reverting disruptive editing is never Edit Warring. You'll probably find yourself on the receiving end of a boomerang. Good luck! Exemplo347 (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

WP:BADNAC

Read it! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Two conversations at ANI, two edit-conflicts with Floquenbeam closing topics! Here's what I wrote for you: :I would have probably relisted it with a note. But if you had closed it the way you did, I wouldn't have (and won't) used my admin status to re-open, preferring instead to point to WP:DRV. --NeilN talk to me 04:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks @NeilN: - I specifically made it a procedural close to allow for it to be nominated again in a non-confusing way without any added ranting! Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 04:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Automatic removal of updates to the Mutual Fund page

You rolled back my changes to the Mutual Fund page because it appeared to be promotional. I guess it was linking to two specific companies that offer classifications of mutual funds. The classifications are ubiquitous, but also proprietary, so I felt it necessary to link to the companies wiki pages. There is nothing promotional about this and I believe the changes should be replaced. Note I also made some changes to address the fact that the article was too US-centric. Rozwat (talk) 02:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

@Rozwat: Greetings. You'll note that there are no other company pages linked within that section of the article, so your addition of two companies to that section does indeed seem like a promotional edit. If there was any need for individual company names, they would already have been added. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
@Exemplo347: Thank you for the clarification. But I disagree with your reasoning. Mainly, this reason is tautalogical: "If there was any need for individual company names, they would already have been added." There is a need for the individual company names, and nobody has added them before. The classifications being used are proprietary to those two firms, so it seems impossible to discuss the classification without linking to the only sources of the classification. But the classifications do need to be discussed, because they are used very widely. Can you link to broader guidelines on this point? I am a new contributor and I had planned a project of updating related information on mutual funds and ETFs, both of which I have expertise in. Rozwat (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

New to Wikipedia Editing

ARodak (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Hey @Exemplo347. Thank you for reaching out with the message about the new edits to the Cabela's wiki page. I am new to wikipedia editing so please bare with me on this, but how would one go about adding valuable information to a page without it breaking conflict of interest. Was just hoping to put up some information about their locations. Let me know! Thanks.

First of all, can you confirm that you have read WP:COI? What's your conflict of interest? (Please don't say "none" if you actually want to be taken seriously) Exemplo347 (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

ARodak (talk) 19:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)I have read the conflict of interest. thank you for bringing that to my attention. I am an employee, however I am not looking to advertise. Just want to put current and valuable information on the page. Much of it is outdated. Sorry if putting that graph back up was a mistake, I've just seen it used on other pages and figured it was acceptable after removing the address/phone number like you had mentioned. Like I mentioned, I am still new to this. What would be your suggestions moving forward? Thanks again for working with me on this one.

As the Conflict of Interest policy states, you should not be editing the article at all. Instead, you should be suggesting edits on the talk page of the article declaring your conflict of interest clearly. Simply follow the procedure in the Conflict of Interest policy. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

ARodak (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)That works for me. If I go in and suggest some edits, can I reach back out to you through here to verify them for approval?

If you follow the procedure in the Conflict of Interest policy, any experienced editor will respond to your request and perform the edits that they feel are appropriate. I must point out that the list of locations that you've tried to add to the article is against Wikipedia's guidelines at WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Comment

Hi Exemplo347,

It looks like you deleted my page shoe´ups. Could you send me the text that i had written on the page ?

Regards,

OrnJoh — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrnJoh (talk • contribs) 12:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

@OrnJoh: Greetings. As the notice says on the top of this talk page, you need to direct your query about your deleted page to the Administrator who deleted it. In this case, as you can see if you access the deleted article, the Admin in question is Fabrictramp - they will be able to answer your query. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Closure

I appreciate your closure, but to be clear, I was actually referring to the entire thread, now rendered moot by the RfC, of which only two sub-sections are currently closed. It's really a minor point, but since convention allows for closed threads to sit idle on ANI for at least a day to allow for global participation, its a fairly consequential housekeeping matter for lengthy threads. TimothyJosephWood 14:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Ah bugger. That'll teach me for trying to help in a half-assed manner! Exemplo347 (talk) 14:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

name of article is incomplete

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranians = wrong

  • Indo-Iranians peoples is correct
If you want to rename an article, the correct procedure is to suggest the change on the talk page of the article. Incidentally, "Indo-Iranians peoples" is never correct. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

pls see it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aryanic_languages&redirect=no and :

Please stop. I've told you the correct procedure to follow. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

can u help me?

can u add Aryanic to article with this source : http://cura.free.fr/xv/14boutet.html - One of its two stars, much like our own Sun, is on the white spectrum while the other is of a yellow-red tinge. Did not Enmerkar, the Sumerian king of Uruk have gifts of silver and gold to offer the Aryan overlord of Chariots? It is therefore possible that these two stars were not as close then as they are now. If one looks closer at the Sumerian legends, one finds many overlapping details with those of the Aryanic peoples. The wild-man of the Gilgamesh cycle for example, bears much resemblance with those found in Scandinavian, Celtic and Vedic myths. This takes us to the imagery found in astrology as well as in I.E. mythology. [16] The Rig Veda, selected, translated and annotated by Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty, 1.160 Vs 1-5, p. 203. « Text

  • thanks
No, as I've said, you should suggest your changes on the Talk page of the article. An experienced editor will then assess your change & make the edit they feel is appropriate. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

COI Template

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please do not add COI templates to articles, as you did at The Russian Bride, when no COI has been declared. If the text is neutral, it doesn't belong there at all. If it isn't, edit the text. Lyrda (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

The COI template is there because you haven't declared your Conflict of Interest. Until you do, please do not comment on my talk page again. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Parker (darts player)

Why are you so sure this is a vandal? Looking at the article the only reference has nothing to do with a "Tom Parker". Please reconsider your actions or explain them. BethNaught (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@BethNaught: The user is a sock of some sort, imitating TomParker680 (note the very slight difference in user name) simply to delete the article in question. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

see it

hi, see it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan : "Aryan" (/ˈɛəriən, ˈɛərjən, ˈær-/)[1] is a term meaning "noble" which was used as a self-designation by Indian and Iranian or Indo-Iranian people. click on Indo-Iranian people .... go to Indo-Iranians. your criteria for speedy deletion is not neccesary and correct. pls delete it. is it very clear , but i will not keep on but you like to delet a correct link.

Greetings. I believe you are referring to the incorrectly spelled Redirect that I have nominated. Mis-spelled redirects are eligible for speedy deletion. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thanks . no problem, i dont like keep on argument, thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callofworld (talk • contribs) 19:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

infobox

for add infobox and add map, i dont know how act?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Minorities_in_Turkey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callofworld (talk • contribs) 13:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

@Callofworld: Infoboxes are never, ever added to the Talk pages of articles. Please do not do it again. Exemplo347 (talk) 13:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

thanks, can u add infobox to this article : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Iranians&oldid=766647898

Maestromanos

I deleted it as A7 rather than hoax, as I didn't consider it 'blatant' (i.e. stand up and spit in your face obvious). However, you might find my post on User talk:BrianKleinman interesting... Peridon (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

@Peridon: That's fine, I agree it wasn't totally blatant. It sounds like we both did the same kinds of checks! Exemplo347 (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
I also had doubts about concealing electrical equipment under the planks at the bottom of a trench. They were to keep the men's feet out of the worst of the mud, and underneath would be water and mud. Not good for the electrics... I did nearly go for blatant over the transmission loops - looping could only have been done manually then - repetition, not actual 'loop'ing. Electric gramophone recording only came in around 1925 (I've got records from before and after, and the difference is incredible), and actual wire and tape for real looping much later still. Recording equipment wouldn't have survived in trench conditions, anyway. There is a chance that this is real and was some oddbod trying things out. No evidence, no article, though. Well spotted, anyway. A lot of patrollers would take it face value. Peridon (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Sandboxing.

My page Pink Floyd Records contains no advertising, propaganda or "sandboxing" of any kind. Please stop undoing my page. I apologize for any inconvenience i might have caused. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crimson1216 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Greetings. Your article was reviewed independently by myself and another editor, and both of us agree that it's not appropriate for inclusion. Please do not recreate your article again in its current format. Use the Article Creation wizard in the future and submit a Draft version of your article for review. Good luck with your future editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your work with new editors. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Getting new editors to understand the environment of Wikipedia is not any easy task especially when you have just requested a speedy deletion on their "Masterpiece". New editors come with the best of intentions but sometimes get disappointed and frustrated. Exemplo347 often deals with explaining our notability guidelines to new editors. Explaining why an article is up for deletion requires skill and tact and a concern for retaining the novice editor. As a member of WikiProject Military history, WikiProject India and WikiProject Pakistan he often runs into situations that require help in understanding language and cultural differences. Siege of Arrah and Bengal Native Infantry are just two articles that display his careful mainspace editing.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: 

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Lepricavark (talk) 05:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

@Buster7: @Lepricavark: - Thanks for that! I had no idea about this award & I'm surprised my behind-the-scenes work has been noticed! Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 12:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Reviewing new pages

Please be careful while choosing criteria for speedy deletion. Vergenoegd Primary School did not fall under G10 and therefore, the tag was removed.  sami  talk 12:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

If a page that calls a School "a laughing stock" without any sources isn't an attack page, I'd like to know exactly what it is. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Well, it read as The school became a laughing stalk and it did not called school a 'laughing stock'. It is not an attack. Instead of tagging the whole page as an attack, you could've removed unsourced claims as I did here. And it is quite obvious that not all new users have better writing skills.  sami  talk 12:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Removing the unsourced claim myself still leaves the unsourced claims visible in the edit history of the article - as the claim also included the name of a teacher, it's a violation of the BLP policy to allow it to remain. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
For this, there is WP:REVDEL.  sami  talk 12:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes, and that would have deleted the article anyway. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
No, WP:REVDEL suppresses/hides only select revisions without deleting the article/page.  sami  talk 12:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Well, in this case, the BLP violation is in the original edit, the creation of the article. How on earth do you think REVDEL would have been able to hide this violation without deleting the article? Exemplo347 (talk) 12:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Technically, it is not 'impossible'.  sami  talk 13:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I never said it was. Anyway, the fact is that the BLP-violating content is still visible in the edit history of this article. Never mind, the article has been tagged for Speedy Deletion under WP:G4 and WP:G5 so the issue is moot. Exemplo347 (talk) 13:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I know the article is up for speedy deletion under valid criteria.  sami  talk 13:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thank you for your steadfast defense of wiki policy and the wiki itself in a recent AfD. Your arguments against a barrage of continual unwiki positions was something to admire! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 13:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Direct Ferries page

Hi Exemplo347,

Thank you for your tips on my talk page. I have added few more lines to the Direct ferries page today https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Ferries. I hope it's according to the Wikipedia guidelines. I assure you no one else uses this login.

Thanks, Speedy09 (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Euromasters

Since the discussion closed on keeping/removing the topic above, I ask you here. What did you mean by: don't completely destroy the formatting of the discussion in future? As said before, I'm from the Netherlands and my English is O.K. at best, so if there is anything I did wrong, I'm willing to know. Kind regards: Oxygene7-13 (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

One of the edits you made to the discussion moved some text around, and it took 3 edits to fix it. It's nothing to worry about. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 20:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Could you please add the link to the destructive edit in your next answer? I don't know what edit you're referring to... Oxygene7-13 (talk) 20:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Here it is. You could have just looked for yourself but like I said, it's nothing to worry about. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
I did nothing else then add a line of text... Dunno what happened to the rest of the conversation above it, but I didn't touch it. I'm asking because I contribute to the Dutch Wiki for almost 2 years now without any trouble at all. I just want to do the right thing, so... Oxygene7-13 (talk) 20:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
It's not worth worrying about. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 20:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for the welcome message, Exemplo. I just tried to reply to you, although I'm not sure if I did it well. Did you get my reply? Torrenegra (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Deletions

- Please delete the page "UserRobinBirk" which you have flagged for deletion. It was created by accident. - Do not delete the page Edna Blanchard. She is a legit artist, past president of the legit Artists of Minnesota, and exhibitor at legit museums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinbirk (talk • contribs) 23:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


Once again, please delete the page "UserRobinBirk" which you have flagged for deletion. It was created by accident. - robinbirk (signed!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinbirk (talk • contribs) 00:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Utilisateur:Arizona1909

I moved Utilisateur:Arizona1909 to User:Arizona1909 and removed the csd as it seemed a misplaced userpage to me. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 11:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Trichotillomania and MCT

Dear Exemplo347,

thank you for your tips on my talk page. I am also grateful that you offered to "ask me or another editor to proofread it." I would be happy for comments on the article on the Metacognitive training, particularly which areas you might find biased. Regarding Trichotillomania: I do not understand, however, why my changes have been deleted. Decoupling was examined in two RCTs which were published in two good journals following peer-review, so I think the information is worth sharing. Decoupling is available at no cost so there are no commercial interests involved.

Very kind regards, research_hh Research hh (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

Hi! I noticed on my talk page that I have been sent a message from you explaining that I had a conflict of interest on one of the articles I edited. I want to know what that article was, so I could demonstrate better wiki edits in the future. I would also like to know, because I don't think I have a conflict of interest with articles I have edited recently. The only substantial edits I have done is on the article Yandere Dev. I do not have any contact, nor have any business relationship with his company. I am only a fan of his work. Is this conflict of interest? Let me know, because I am a new user on wikipedia and do not know all of the rules. Thanks!

Jamesjpk (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesjpk (talk • contribs) 00:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Greetings. The fact that you have focused your editing on articles related to that topic is the reason the Conflict of Interest template was placed on your Talk page. It's quite unusual for a new editor to focus their edits onto articles related to one company, but as the template says "you may have a conflict of interest", not "you definitely have a conflict of interest", you should take it at face value - it's an explanation of a particular policy. If you focus your edits onto other topics then nobody else will raise a similar concern. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 01:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Talk Page Header

Hi! I have used part of your header of the talk page in mine. Is that okay? I can remove it if you want me too. I made slight edits to the talk page header to better fit my talk page. Let me know!

Always open to feedback, Jamesjpk (talk) 01:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

That's fine. It's a standard header, probably hundreds of editors have a similar thing. Good luck with your future editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 01:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Guidance Barnstar

The Guidance Barnstar
Thank you for helping me get started on wikipedia! You gave me well-needed constructive feedback and helped me learn more about this platform. Thanks :D. Jamesjpk (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Well Deserved Nomintaion

A Tshirt!
I thought that you deserved something a bit extra for all of the amazing work you've done for the project.
I've nominated you for a gift from the Wikimedia Foundation!

<3 Jamesjpk (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Request on 16:10:52, 12 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Gerarddenerval


Sorry - I inadvertently pasted the Gavin Selerie draft twice. However the main draft was indeed revised in an attempt to meet your requirements. However I will now consult Teahouse

Gerarddenerval (talk) 16:10, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

@Gerarddenerval: That's fine. Once you get your submission cleared up (remove the extra copy of the text and format your sourcing using the link already provided to you by the previous reviewer) then feel free to resubmit your draft. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 17:03, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

please do not Delete Kharen Hill

Kharen Hill is a legitimate Canadian/Us Celebrity photographerand artist.RhyH (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Need some help understanding why edits reversed

Hi Exemplo247,

This is in response to: User_talk:OldWaysTea#March_2017

I understand why you requested I change my username. I was OldWaysTea (which I personally sell tea under). I am now TeaFriend. I have no interest in promoting my business on Wikipedia. I just want to make sure all information is factual and correct.

What I don't understand is why my edits to Guobiao Standards and Wuyi Tea were reversed. You said something about external links, but I only added links to existing wiki articles that seemed relevant to the pages.

Could you help me understand what I need to do to help contribute? I have spent a lot of time in Wuyishan, China and believe I can do a good job finding references and information to better fill out these articles.

TeaFriend (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Try editing something that doesn't involve tea, and don't add anything tea-related to it. Those are the best tips I can give you. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Question about the changes

Now that you have have deleted what ever you see is wrong with the article, is there anything else I can do to get the warning type sign at the top, removed? Thanks! Al — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allotnap (talk • contribs) 01:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, but the improvement templates can't be removed until every single problem they address has been sorted out. That includes a WP:COI concern - have you read WP:COI? You really need to. You can't claim to have no connection, because that article is the only thing you've been editing and new editors without connections never act like that. Openness & honesty are your friend here. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 01:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Is being a big fan a connection? Is the source material sub par? I just wanted to get it right. there are a lot of uninformed articles out there. Yes I have read the WP:COI. Thank you for pointing it out. Is there anything else about the article that needs help? Please advise. Allotnap (talk) 02:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Each of the individual improvement notices has a link to a helpful page that addresses the individual concern. If, after reading through all the pages, you have any further questions then the best place to ask is Wikipedia:Teahouse - hit the "Ask a Question" button and someone will help you as soon as they can. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 02:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

New to this and will get better. Thank you for all your help! Allotnap (talk) 02:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

That's no problem. It may seem like myself and other editors are being unhelpful in removing your edits from your article, but in fact the edits that have been made are preventing the Speedy Deletion of your article (under this criteria) which can happen without warning if articles are too promotional in nature. Good luck with your future editing! Exemplo347 (talk) 02:15, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Not sure why you have scheduled Jozeff for deletion, there are plenty of notable links on there. There are hundreds of other artist pages/biographies we used for reference when creating the wikipedia page Jozeff, yet they are not removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:40E:9600:A8BB:ECF4:4AB3:C8E8 (talk) 12:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Please sign in before you edit, otherwise I have no idea who I'm talking to. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Jozeff

Apolagies Exemplo347.

The last post regarding 'Jozeff' was myself. Can you suggest any changes that would reverse the page deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danieljames9090 (talk • contribs) 12:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

The problem is that no sources can be found that satisfy Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline - I pointed this out to you with the Improvement notices I placed on the article, which you deleted without fixing the issue. Read through WP:RS - improve the article if you can, but do not delete the Article for Deletion notice again. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 12:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Black English listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black English. Since you had some involvement with the Black English redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 14:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Please allow me to delete the Rotair wiki page. As you are a contributor

Please allow me to delete the Rotair wiki page. As you are a contributor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jake505k (talk • contribs) 23:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

@Jake505k: I'm afraid that's not how Wikipedia works. When you first published the article, you legally released control of the text. Even if I wanted the article to be deleted, it would be extremely unlikely to happen - the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion so there's no legitimate reason for its deletion. Exemplo347 (talk) 23:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

COI

Hi Exemplo347,

No COI to declare. Being a resident of Mt Roskill, Auckland. I am just really inspired by the young Shail Kaushal, born overseas but grew up in Mt Roskill and is now on the Auckland's local government representing my area. He has doorknocked my place number of times. Also the first Indian-born to be ever elected by the people in Auckland, New Zealand, and one of the youngest. My next contributions would be on page Puketapapa Local Board, and local MP Michael Wood.

Thanks,

Bondj

@Bondj: Greetings. Two things you need to know - firstly, you should be signing your posts with 4 tildes ~. Secondly, during Articles for Deletion discussions, you should only be voting once - that includes votes cast while you're not logged in. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Examplo347: thanks, noted. (talk) 00:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Deleting the page titled MonsterIndia.com

Hi-I wanted to check why the page was deleted when I've cited several independent sources verifying all the information that I have listed about Monsterindia.com. There are other job sites like Naukri.com with wiki pages written in a similar fashion on wikipedia - could you let me know why they aren't considered promotional content? Please see links below - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naukri.com Thanks Sonal nerurkar (talk) 21:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)sonal nerurkar

As you can see here, your article was deleted because it was unambiguously promotional in nature. In the future, I recommend using the Article Creation wizard - you can create your draft and then submit it for review, and experienced editors will give you tips. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi-how can I access the page to upload it in Article Creation wizard? Will I have to recreate it? It would help if you can make it available for me. Thanks Sonal nerurkar (talk) 22:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)sonal

If you ask the Administrator who deleted your page (@Athaenara:), they may be willing to recreate the article in your Sandbox. It's their decision though, so I can't promise that they will do it. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

About Alex Daoud

Hi, Exemplo! I'm responding to your request for page protection of this article. I did not impose protection because I temporarily blocked the current problem editor, and the previous one is indefinitely blocked. But it is clear that the article is being attacked by sockpuppets and there are likely to be more. I have filed a sockpuppet investigation request at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexisdaoud. If you have an ongoing interest in that article, you might want to take note of it. Because if they do identify a sockmaster, then when new users show up at that article doing the same thing, you can report them to WP:SPI (or for that matter to me) and get them dealt with quickly. --MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

@MelanieN: Thanks for that! I added the article to my watchlist last month because of the long term, slow motion vandalism, so I'll continue to pop over to it whenever it's vandalised (as it surely will be!) by yet another sockpuppet. I'll keep my eye on the SPI too. Thanks again for your help! Exemplo347 (talk) 22:42, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
The two most recent ones were determined to be socks. They didn't evaluate the earlier IPs but they were obviously socks too. The sockmaster is Alexisdaoud, for future reference. BTW I just spent a couple of hours cleaning up and referencing that article. Might as well have a well-developed Wikipedia article for them to try to mess up. 0;-D --MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
The silly thing is, I only found out about the deleted content (it was deleted months and months ago) when I noticed them messing about with the article. If they'd left it alone, that deleted section would have probably never been restored! Exemplo347 (talk) 00:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Good work. Wikipedia has strong defenses and we do catch up with mischief eventually. --MelanieN (talk) 00:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

On this day, 1 year ago...

Hey, Exemplo347. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 02:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

EDITS FROM THE PENTECOSTAL MISSION ARTICLE

Sir, This is with regard to the following MESSAGE " Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Pentecostal Mission, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Exemplo347" received from your side.

It has come to my notice that there is a section in the The Pentecostal Mission Article called Criticisms and controversies.It contains unsubstantiated information and allegations without any basis. So when I remove this, you reinstate it back. I have already given my explanation that it is just allegations with no proof.

I want to know who posted this information in the first place and what proof was given of these Criticisms and controversies. Please produce your information to substantiate these Criticisms and controversies in The Pentecostal Mission Article or PLEASE REMOVE IT IMMEDIATELY. STOP PUTTING WRONG INFORMATION. ANY PERSON CAN MAKE UP CONTROVERSIES. I HOPE WIKIPEDIA WILL MOVE TO A HIGHER STANDARD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomasmath72 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Greetings. If you wish to see who added information to an article, click on "View history" and you will be able to see which editor added the information. If you want to see how the information is substantiated, click on the reference that can be found at the end of the particular sentence or paragraph. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 07:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Why You want to Delete ZEBRONICS page

HI Exemplo347 Can I know the reason for why you are applying to delete the page ZEBRONICS. I don't think it has any errors nor looks like a advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keschristo (talk • contribs) 11:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Greetings. The reasons for the Speedy Deletion are stated in the Speedy Deletion template - namely, the following criteria apply - WP:A7 and WP:G11. Also, when an article is protected from creation, you shouldn't create an all-capitals version of the title to bypass the protection. Regards.Exemplo347 (talk) 11:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of page is not applicable

HI Exemplo347,

I feel G11 is not applicable kindly read it carefully before applying.

Well you're incorrect. It applies. Please note that using multiple accounts to edit Wikipedia is not allowed. Exemplo347 (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Exemplo347 no it is not applicable. Anybody can edit the pages in Wikipedia. Many people editing a same article can't be considered as spammers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kesavanchristo (talk • contribs) 11:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

It is applicable. Anyway, the place to discuss this isn't on my talk page - you should press the "contest this deletion" button on the article, make a short statement why you disagree and then wait for a response from an administrator. You should only press the button once - don't use multiple accounts to do it. Exemplo347 (talk) 11:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Exemplo347,

Yeah already reported about your activies under edit warring and also for spamming activities also appealed to delete the user. Hope it will work. Let see

I have no idea what you're talking about. Please do not use multiple accounts to edit Wikipedia. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
@Kesavanchristo: cut it out or you're going to end up blocked. @Exemplo347: multiple accounts? Please fill me in, so I can block them -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
@There'sNoTime: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Infozeb. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 12:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
I've asked a checkuser to take a look, but it seems very likely to me - we'll known shortly -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

There is no sign of spamming i feel @exemplo347 is ment to do edit warring like he always does. kindly do check it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kesavanchristo (talk • contribs) 12:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Yeah... There'sNoTime, not at all opposed to a block on the grounds of WP:STOPWASTINGEVERYONESTIME. TimothyJosephWood 12:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
All blocked as socks -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks @There'sNoTime: - all part of the joy of New Contributions patrolling! Exemplo347 (talk) 12:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
You know the drill. If you haven't been called an insufferable cunt in a few days then you're probably not doing it right. TimothyJosephWood 12:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
I once saw a blog that called me "an asshole" and it made me feel warm and fuzzy for a week. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Aww. I'm jelly. It would make such a nice addition to the list. TimothyJosephWood 12:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
So Timothyjosephwood, I've had a quick flick through your contributions and statistics - have you considered adminship? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Seconded, if only because it'll stop the edit conflicts I keep getting when Timothyjosephwood tags articles at the same time I'm doing it! Exemplo347 (talk) 13:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
I have, but I seriously doubt I would pass. I have edited substantially on articles related to politics, and I don't expect it would take much time for someone to dig up some kind of dirt or some discussion where I used a "naughty word" and use that to argue that I would immediately delete the main page and range block Australia.
But I guess that if there's some feeling that it's worth the time, I can try the pre-RfA muck fest at some point. TimothyJosephWood 13:08, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Give WP:ORCP a whirl and see how it goes - I think you'll be pleasantly surprised as for blocking Australia, what have they ever done for us eh -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Re weird appellations: a particularly tiresome troll used to call me "kidneyless". I should have saved a diff, because I can't find it now - it is probably the strangest thing I've been called, though. :-o --bonadea contributions talk 14:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

That's definitely a comment worth printing out & framing for your wall! Exemplo347 (talk) 14:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
YOU KIDNEYLESS COWARD! YOU...YOU...YOU Lungless salamander! TimothyJosephWood 15:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

CSMonitor Photojournalist Page

Hello - I see that you edited my draft of the [N. Converse] wikipedia page. I think you said that linking to csmonitor.com was a copyright infringement, but I work for CSM and we have rights to the article. Does that mean I can still reference? I'm just about to add the COI bit. Also, I'm not sure if you took out some sections of the articles, but I was wondering why they can't be used. Much appreciated! Csmonitorwiki (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Greetings @Csmonitorwiki:. Unfortunately, copyrighted material cannot usually be added to Wikipedia, even if you work for the people who own the copyright. Have a look at WP:COPYVIO for information, including the procedure required if a copyright holder wishes to release copyrighted information for use by the Wikimedia Foundation. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your reply @Exemplo347:. The article does contain facts about Gordon Converse's life (e.g. he was named Newspaper-Magazine Photographer of the Year in 1959) - would I be able to cite those? I'm working on submitting a release of copyright, but may run into impediments with legal counsel at CSM, so I thought that in the meantime I might be able to include these facts. Thanks!

If you use your own wirds (not just paraphrasing) then that would be fine (you should still cite & reference) so go ahead! Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Something regarding an AFD close...

Hi, to the best of my knowledge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Material Sciences Corporation do not warranted a NAC. Both the sides were evenly poised and per WP:NACD:-Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to admins. And taking a decision based (solely/mainly) based on Cunard's sources(which was the last opinion) somehow gave me the impression that the closer exercised a super-vote.Anyway, what d'ya think?Do not take this as a request to reopen the disc. or otherwise.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 10:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Greetings @Winged Blades of Godric:. I closed the discussion as Keep, not based solely on Cunard's sources but also based on WP:NEXIST - Unscintillating listed sources also. Therefore, the claims made that no sources exist was demonstrated to be incorrect. It certainly wasn't a super-vote - it was a result of a policy-based analysis of the discussion. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 10:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
But Unscintillating's rationale was countered by DGG(and there's substance in it) and later Koffman etc.(folks who frequent company related AFDs etc) stayed for delete.So the consensus does not seem so easily understandable to me.Anyway, let's move forward.Winged Blades Godric 10:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
I know it was a close call (and I'm happy to take flak about it) but someone had to make the leap! All the best. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Winged Blades Godric 11:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history

You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Material Sciences Corporation

This is actually still a questionable close, especially as a non-admin, because I was actually going to comment and analyze since the one other comment, also analyzed them. Re-opening this would benefit for everyone to see the sources. Especially because the sources actually violate WP:What Wikipedia is not, given the offered sources actually contain pricing and costs info (WP: Wikipedia is not a sales catalogue). Such sources would not improve the article. SwisterTwister talk 15:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Fair enough @SwisterTwister:, I've undone the close. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 15:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Indian defence services

You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Exemplo347/Archive_2&oldid=1146646638"