User talk:Haydon.h.

Welcome!

Hello, Haydon.h., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Exemplo347 (talk) 09:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Haydon.h.. You have new messages at Amortias's talk page.
Message added 22:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Amortias (T)(C) 22:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'Twice as Nice Production Discography

I think you're correct and I wasn't, so merge tag can go. DonFB (talk) 09:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please remove merge tag.

Done

Haydon.h., you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Haydon.h.! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Twice as Nice

If you are convinced that Twice as Nice is a notable company, I would suggest that you get rid of all the trvila and tangential references and try and get a few, perhaps 6 at most, which are reliable sources, independednt of the company and which specifically mention Twice as Nice (by that name and not by the name of an individual memeber) in a way that suggests that the company is notable. Wading through the morass of references that are present is not going to endear the article to any experienced editor. Best ofluck. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 01:55, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your advice. I am wondering though, How though does the company not achieve notability regardless, under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) criteria no. 6: Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians (Haydon.h. (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

The individual musicians may be notable under Wikipedia's rules (I haven't chcked) but this is a production company which has to achieve its own notability, in its own name independently of any notability that its members may enjoy. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 02:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of that, the company receives it through wikipedia's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_composers_and_lyricists, criteria. 1. Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition. I don't see how this is not easily met by, for example, Twice as Nice's work on the song 'Needed Me'. We find this in the article with reference [7] http://www.complex.com/music/2016/01/a-look-at-the-production-credits-for-rihannas-anti-album That source is from a major independent website, which credits 'Twice As Nice' as "producers", "composers" and "lyricists" on the track 'Needed Me', which was a 4xplatinum track and one of the biggest tracks of 2016. This information is referenced in the very first paragraph of the article. This quite clearly meets the above 'notability' standards. (Haydon.h. (talk) 03:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)) (Haydon.h. (talk) 03:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Please can you reconsider your position on this matter. The group is undoubtedly notable. The page is being attacked on a basis which ignores common sense. Please see discussion on the deletion place, I urge you to reconsider. (Haydon.h. (talk) 11:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

It is not for me to reconsider. I have made suggestions and, in greater part, you have chosen to ignore them. I doubt whether they would have made any dfference anyway. Please read WP:GNG carefully and comprehensively and please don't go cherry picking bits of Wikipedia guidance and policy that you believe fits your particular case. Please try and understand the philosophy and the over-arching principles of Wikipedia. Your over zealous defence and wiki-lawyering smacks just a little of paid editing, and, if that is the case, your Wikipedia career will undoubtedly be short lived. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing? I just don't like being told I'm wrong, and being patronised by some wiki-editor hero. I am a lawyer by trade though. I don't see why I can't cherry pick bits of wikipedia guidance and policy that fit my particular case, when it is the same guidance and policy being cherry picked to delete an article.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Haydon.h.. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. You must disclose your Conflict of Interest Exemplo347 (talk) 09:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Nicholas Audino page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Twice as Nice, from its old location at User:Haydon.h./Twice as Nice. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 12:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twice as Nice (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As mentioned in the original deletion discussion, there is no coverage specifically about Twice as Nice. The important information ("Formation and early work") is entirely unsourced. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Twice as Nice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Twice as Nice concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Twice as Nice, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Twice as Nice

Hello, Haydon.h.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Twice as Nice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]