User talk:EverGreg

Welcome!

Hello, EverGreg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Lost Files of Sherlock Holmes

The Underdogs link was removed because the relevant page had a direct download link for the copyrighted item concerned. In general it's not generally acceptable to link to sites that are violating other peoples copyrights, which was the general view expressed in the disscussion I reffered to in my edit summary. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I don't think we need the underdogs link for the sake of references, so I guess it could go. EverGreg (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is EV71 is foot and mouth diease?

All the reports indicate that Enterovirus 71 is foot and mouth diease and thus should be mentioned in the foot and mouth disease article. Wouldn't you say so? If you agree, please mange changes to the food and mouth disease.

"This informaiton should have gone into Enterovirus, the chinese outbreak was unrelated to foot and mouth disease)" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.131.200.217 (talk) 01:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, as I stated in Talk:Foot-and-mouth disease‎ there's a confusion between Foot and mouth disease and the very similar sounding hand, foot and mouth disease. The first disease affect mainly animals with cloven hooves while the latter infect humans. EverGreg (talk) 17:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I guess there was a bit of confusion. Thanks for clearing everything up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.131.203.38 (talk) 02:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You'r welcome :-) EverGreg (talk) 07:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wolves

I guess I misread the chapter on wolves and epizootic outbreaks. Upon re-reading it, it does not specify that wolves actually die from it, but that they are central to it's spread in some areas, much like dogs. Apologies.Dark hyena (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

that's ok, the reference will still be useful. :-) EverGreg (talk) 07:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Myiasis

Hello. I've placed a comment on the talk page for myasis. I feel very strongly on the issue of unnecessary censorship. Please take this into consideration on the subject of the myiasis picture. As always I feel obliged let you know that I am the uploader of said picture. You can read my comments on the Myiasis talk page. Thank you and best regards. Monkeytheboy (talk) 18:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not actually gone from the page, see talk page. Thanks for the picture by the way! EverGreg (talk) 21:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the clown in conway's cell automata

Hello, there is my book and for copyrigh there are no problem because the book is presently old and out of sales. for your others recomandations I manage them kind regards jc perez

Jean-claude perez (talk) 20:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the clown in conway's cell automata

sorry I restored original release

Jean-claude perez (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits related to The Government Pension Fund of Norway

Hi there. Thanks for recently adding info related to The Government Pension Fund of Norway to various articles. It's great that you've also added citations to your edits, so other users can verify them. However, just pasting the relevant url within <ref></ref> isn't really in line with Wikipedia:Citing sources#How to format citations. I would suggest that you have a look at Wikipedia:Citation templates for some useful templates. Cheers. Manxruler (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colder on high mountains

Nice summary. I had edited that question primarily to add a section title to separate it from the Mustard seed section which I knew was about to explode. Too often answers on the ref desks contain no references, but a link to a correct but difficult to read article isn't much of an improvement. Thanks for doing the heavy lifting on that one. -- ToE 16:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding the right article in the first place :-) EverGreg (talk) 09:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent Energy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Intelligent Energy. Since you had some involvement with the Intelligent Energy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). PrimeHunter (talk) 10:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Silvercity.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Silvercity.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]