User talk:Euripides ψ

This user may have left Wikipedia. Euripides ψ has not edited Wikipedia since December 26, 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Nixious6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian Ottoman Wars

Hi there. Thank you for your consideration. I can help on that. What do you practically need for the moment? Bests Aigest (talk) 08:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Having trouble on the link you posted. Anyway ignoring trolling, one of the best sources on that is Selami Pulaha book here, but there are other sources too. I'll try to find them and create the article sketch than you can continue. Bests Aigest (talk) 06:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 20:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one of your recent file uploads, such as your addition to Skanderbeg, had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. I reverted your addition of copyrighted text at Skanderbeg. Please be more careful in future not to add copyrighted text to wikipedia. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I advise you to revert yourself at Skanderbeg article. You copied text from work of Babinger almost word to word. That is not allowed. Please read Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from public domain materials requires proper attribution

You added material to Albanian resistance during World War II copied word-for-word from http://countrystudies.us/albania/30.htm. That's okay, since the source document is a product of the US Government. But you have to provide attribution. For PD sources, this can be done by adding the template {{PD-notice}} after your citation. Please do this in the future when re-using public domain content. All content needs to be written in your own words, or properly attributed. More info on this topic can be found at Wikipedia:Plagiarism. Any further copyright problems will result in a block, so please be more careful. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Off wiki behavior

Hi,

I noticed that on one off wiki website (link) somebody wrote a comment about me. This person acted as it was you. Do you know anything about it?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I kindly remind you to please answer the above question.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Sorry,this is the second time this is happening,several months ago someone used my name in Stomrfront.Org pretending to be a member of the forum,inciting hatred.This is not the first time my name is being used by someone else,I apologize. Euripides ψ (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarification. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changing citations

Hi,

I noticed that with this edit (diff) you:

changed citation by removing the quote and
changed the page number
with explanation "adding referenced assertion"

I checked again the source and can confirm that the quote is authentic and that original page number (60) was also correct. I will restore the quote and page number. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,I did that on mistake. Euripides ψ (talk) 20:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skanderbeg

Hi,

I have just undid your bold addition of unnecessary detail of the battle predominantly based on outdated or unscholarly sources. Please look at Talk:Skanderbeg/GA2 which says that article is too long. It does not need additional unnecessary details which are within scope of Albanian–Venetian War, especially based on outdated sources like Franko Demetrio or unscholarly sources like Francione Genaro. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yet it does need a little detail about the Albanian-Venetian war.And why is it outdated?Why is it unnecessary?Just because you don't like it?I know you love patrolling the Skanderbeg article 24/7 for whatever ridiculous reason and notifying me for every edit I make.I believe the Battle of Drin is important information and btw Noli and Oliver Jens Schmmit are not outdated.Also why is a primary source outdated?Cause you don't like what is written there?So please give me a logical,not WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT reason why the Battle of Drin shouldn't be mentioned. Euripides ψ (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skanderbeg II

Note that I did explain my edit in the edit summary. Please see categorization guideline if you need more information about categorization. Category:15th-century Albanian people is the most specific category in the tree of Category:History of Albania, therefore Skanderbeg should be categorized in Category:15th-century Albanian people and not in any of its (grand)parent categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kingdom of Albania (medieval) into Albanians. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of This user supports the LGBT community

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 00:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user supports the LGBT community

Hi Euripides ψ,

The page that you recently created seems to be more of a test page to me. With this said, I suggest that you re-create the page as a template. This link should help you out. Cheers, FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 00:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skanderbeg again

Hi,

I noticed you edit warred to delete cited assertion from Skanderbeg article (diff and diff), contrary to valid objections of another editor. Please stop with your disruptive editing. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 01:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

9 March 2016

Hello, you are possibly the only Albanian active here. I am from Lazarat and want to make its article a Good one. Could you please advise or better help me? By the way do you exchange emails?Lazarati (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I enabled my email. You can visit my Userpage and email me. I had to ask you some questions.Lazarati (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well,first off the article requires expanding.The village was made famous due to recent incidents,therefor we have a lot of sourced information available.So that shouldn't be a problem.We could find more pictures to illustrate it.And the most important thing is to cite everything.We need to cite every possible assertion.

To be honest with you,I don't find much interest in this article and never really thought about it,but it would be nice to get to GA class.I will see if I have time for it,but my focus goes to the Skanderbeg and Albanians articles. Euripides ψ (talk) 20:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I understand you as a Serb " ?

In this edit (diff) you wrote speculation about my ethnicity and attributed motives to me based on such speculation. That is violation of no personal attack wikipedia policy (WP:NPA). Please be so kind not to repeat such violation again. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry,I didn't know calling someone by their ethnicity was a personal attack.Is calling someone by their name also a personal attack?If that is the case,then sorry again.Is it a personal attack calling someone by their gender also a personal attack?Then sorry again. Euripides ψ (talk) 21:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Although I politely asked you to please be so kind not to write speculations about my ethnicity, you repeated it in your mockery disguised as an apology ("...I didn't know calling someone by their ethnicity was a personal attack."). --Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Euripides, your non-apology apology is itself an insult and I will be more than happy to block for it if you persist. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 02:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skanderbeg is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Drawing conclusions from the ethnicity of other users is viewed very dimly here. If the mission of your Wikipedia editing is to promote the importance of Albania in various historical articles, you are risking sanctions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I became aware of your edits due to a thread here, which I assume was referring to you. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not here to "promote the importance of Albania in various historical articles". I'm working specifically on that article so I can get it to a point where it can be promoted to Good Article class. Euripides ψ (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I would never even think of contacting you for assistance"

With this edit (diff) you wrote Antidiskriminator,sorry but I would never even think of contacting you for assistance. as reply to my comment (diff) in which I politely offered you my help: Hi Euripides ψ, what kind of help you need? I am the most active member of wp Albania and I am willing to help. Feel free to ask me for help whenever you need help in articles within WP Albania scope.

I gently point that your comment might be seen as uncivil, snide, aggressive, rude and disrespectful. I want to move on without reporting your disruptive behavior, but I would appreciate if you could refrain from making such comments to me in future. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See,I told you I can't tell you why without being accused of "breaking the rules".Just know that I do not want to collaborate with you,thank you for offering your help whatsoever. Euripides ψ (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skanderberg's ancestry.

I noticed that you deleted my adding "Albanian people of Serbian descent" from Skanderberg's page. His mother, as I stated was considered to have probably been of Serbian origin, her wiki page states that. So why did you delete it? Are you reluctant to admit that Skanderberg may have been part-Serbian in descent?KVLG (talk) 00:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's been discussed multiple times and it hasn't been proven a fact. So we don't add that in the article. Even registered Serbian wikipedians accept that so we leave it at that. Euripides ψ (talk) 14:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on article talkpage

Hi,

I noticed that you used heading to attack other user by naming them in the heading (diff). That is violation of WP:TALK which says:

**Never use headings to attack other users: While no personal attacks and assuming good faith apply everywhere at Wikipedia, using headings to attack other users by naming them in the heading is especially egregious, as it places their names prominently in the Table of Contents, and can thus enter that heading in the edit summary of the page's edit history.

Please be so kind to respect wikipedia behavioral guidelines and refrain from attacking other editors by naming them in the heading. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons is an English Wikipedia policy which also applies to talkpages. With this comment (diff) you wrote negative text about living person. Please be so kind to take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi,

I noticed that you mark almost all of your edits as minor edits, even those which substantially change the meaning of the text. That is violation of Help:Minor edit. Please don't mark edits that change the meaning of the text as minor. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 06:30, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Euripides ψ. I agree with Antidiskriminator on this issue. I hardly mark any of my edits as minor, and I suggest you do the same. "Minor edit" is intended to be used only for really tiny and uncontroversial edits. Some people with large watch-lists have chosen not to have minor edits shown in their watch-list feed, and hence will miss out on important changes if your edits are not correctly coded. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information on this topic. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see my username mentioned there. May I know what it's about? Euripides ψ (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, [1]! Ktrimi991 (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Euripides ψ

Hello Euripides ψ! It appears that you send me an email, however for some reason I can't reply to it. But you want you can send me your actual e-mail! Vargmali (talk) 13:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join Shqip Wikipedia

Hi Euripides ψ if you are interested to join Shqip Wikipedia I can help you with some helpful advises. Just contact me via email option here:[2]. There you can ask everything you need. All the best to you! Ktrimi991 (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You joined Shqip Wikipedia. You can find many things to do here [3]. You can do other things like editing Rilindja Kombetare and Skenderbeu which are in your interest. Don't hesitate to email me, I know what you need and I am ready to help you. Sometimes things are hard there but Shqip Wikipedia is very interesting. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kerkoja nihmen tande ne En.Wikipedia Ktrimi ne qofte se munesh. Euripides ψ (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I perfectly understand what do you need. Just do what I said. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Um, nuk kam absolutisht kurrfare interesi ne Sq.Wikipedia Ktrimi. Te gjithe artikujt nuk kane kurrfare burime dhe vetem shkruhen nga autor me ndjenjat e veta. Nese nuk ke deshir te me ndihmosh, e kuptoj, vetem me thuaj. Euripides ψ (talk) 13:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

E kuptoj shume mire cfare do te thuash, por nuk mund te flasim haptazi ketu. Pak me siper te dhashe nje link, aty do gjesh menyren si te flasim bashke privatisht pa na bezdisur njeri. E kuptoj qe do te punojme per en.wikipedia sepse edhe une nuk kam interes shume per sq.wikipedia por nuk mund te flasim hapur ketu. Po bej sikur po te ftoj tek sq.Wikipedia thjesht per te luajtur rolin qe te mos na kuptojne. To conclude it is very easy to edit sq.wikipedia, it is in the same way with en.wikipedia. Ktrimi991 (talk) 14:45, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linku numer dy qe te con tek faqja e perdoruesit tim ne sq.wikipedia. Neqoftese me kontakton me thuaj edhe ketu. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vazhdimi ne Wiki

Pershendetje. Nuk eshte se jam larguar nga wikipedia por thejsht nuk kam edituar me per arsye nga me te ndryshmet po mbi te gjitha koha e paket ne dispozicion pasi po merrem me projekte te tjera. Gjithsesi jam i gatshem per te te ndihmuar. Per cfare ke nevoje? Gj te mirat Aigest (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jam duke punuar ne artikullin per rilindjen Shqiptare qe ta nominoj per GA. Kerkoja ndihmen tende pasi qe te respektoj si wikipedian, mirepo nese ke pune te tjera, kuptohet. Wikipedia eshte vetem hobby. Ne qofte se je i lire ndonjehere, vetem me kontakto dhe mund te bashkpunojme per artikuj te ndryshem ne WP:Albania. Euripides ψ (talk) 19:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Hidhi nje sy ketij materiali dhe me thuaj. Duke lene menjane politizimet e panevojshme ne ate liber ka mjaft fakte interesante qe mund te perdoren per periudhen e shek 19. Duke i hedhur nje sy te shpejte artikullit shikoj qe duhen korigjuar disa gjera psh Rilindja kombetare fillon me heret, qe nga shkrimtaret arbereshe vitet 1840 dhe vazhdoi me Naum Veqilharxhi etj. Material tjeter interesant sidomos per foto, letra, doreshkrime dhe printe gazetash eshte ky materiali tjeter. Gjithsesi sic thashe hidhi nje sy e me thuaj. Gj te mirat Aigest (talk) 07:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Faleminderit shume Aigest. Jam duke e lexuar mire librin dhe do me sherbej shume per artikullin. Kristo Frasheri eshte mjaft i mire dhe i besueshem edhe pse ka pak nuanca nacionaliste. Nese kthehesh ndonjeher plotesisht ne Wikipedia, me kontakto, do doja shume te bashkpunoja me ty per artikuj te ndryshem dhe t'ia permirsoja kualitetin ne WP:Albania. P.S Ne qofte se e ke nje PDF te librit te Selami Pulahes per Skenderbeun te lutem ma dergo. Gjitha te mirat, Euripides. Euripides ψ (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Instant-runoff voting

I see that you're a Bernie supporter, which indicates to me that you would support fair voting reform. The Wikipage: Instant-runoff voting.

For the group fighting for it, check out: http://www.FairVote.org.

To see why it's necessary, check out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqblOq8BmgM.

It's supported by the Green Party: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb7MQ7da6sg.

Suggestions:

Share on Facebook
Twitter
Everywhere
Post a sign in your front yard that says, "The USA needs Instant-Runoff Voting!"

^Knowledge_Battle ^(Talk) | ^Godless_Infidel ︻╦╤── 19:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Euripides ψ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Euripides ψ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fatlum Meholli

Përshëndetje!

Jam nje artist i ri, dhe dua ta krijoj nje artikull per veten , si mund ta arrij kete?

Sinqerisht , Fatlum MEHOLLI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatlumi11 (talk • contribs) 08:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Euripides ψ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]