User talk:Eugenia Sawin

This is Eugenia Sawin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Sawin (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Sawin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Sawin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eugenia Sawin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David Sawin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Sawin. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Eugenia Sawin/David Sawin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Eugenia Sawin/David Sawin. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David Sawin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Sawin. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am terribly sorry if I inadvertantly submitted the same draft twice. I think I had added a citation (1) at the suggestion of Praxidicae. I also have been advised that I should disclose the connection to the subject on my Profile, but I have not been able to figure out how to do that. Thank you for your help in these matters. Eugenia Sawin (talk) 20:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I put some text on your User page. Delete that and add what you want. User page is for describing your intent as an editor. Also to declare any COIs. See mine and others as examples. David notMD (talk) 02:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done. As a scientist in an extended family of artists (pottery, poetry, stop-motion animation, music) I am all for recognition. I hope you are able to find independent, published content that acknowledges your father's role. David notMD (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Eugenia Sawin! You created a thread called David Sawin at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David Sawin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Sawin. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Sawin has been accepted

David Sawin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Sawin (2)

Hello, Eugenia Sawin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Sawin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]