User talk:Ericorbit/Archive17

fearless and billboard 200

It was already written in here --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number-one_albums_of_2009_(U.S.) <-- I've just adjourned!--Dindo94 (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

It should not have been written there - the sources for Feb 7 were copied over fro the prior week, which is incorrect. I've reverted that change. - eo (talk) 14:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

American Idol Hot 100

Not a particularly meaningful intersection of categories. I'd vote to kill it at AFD.—Kww(talk) 21:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

If it were a Bulgarian talent show it would burn at AfD. My gut instinct tells me that consensus wouldn't be reached in this case, considering the notability of the show and the general US perspective that Wikipedia holds. I think you could go for it, but you would need a persuasive argument. I would vote delete myself. — Realist² 22:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hot 100

Yes, I understand that Clarkson's song has been 'announced' as the next #1; however, the article uses unambiguous language to make clear that the song is 'not yet' the #1 song (emphasis added):

"Kelly Clarkson will make history on this week's Billboard Hot 100, to be posted tomorrow (Jan. 29) on Billboard.com, with the largest leap to No. 1 in the chart's 50-year history."

As the Hot 100 page currently exists, the last line in the intro is for the current #1, which is GaGa. For now, I'll leave the page as-is until one of us can convince the other about what I think should be called an official leak of future conditions is considered an official announcement of current conditions. -- CB (ö) 21:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what your are doing

I am going to keep reverting the page until there is discussion. Billhits (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

American Idol Hot 100 singles

I have made some changes to American Idol Hot 100 singles and since you voted Delete in the AfD, I would appreciate you looking at the article and telling me what you think. Aspects (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Badu

DON'T YOU EVER REVERT MY EDITS IF YOU ARE NOT CHECKING THE SOURCES. The album is in stores, stupid. Walmart, CD Universe, BestBuy, etc. It was a compilation of some of her past songs and new songs.[1], [2]. YOU BETTER CHECK YOURSELF BEFORE YOU START AN EDIT WAR OVER STUPID STUFF. Tarysky (talk) 02:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

And it's a store item.[3] So you better ask somebody before you find yourself blocked for vandalism, bad faith, and definition of character. Tarysky (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

This isn't a personal attack, but a warning. Because your block is close should you step out of line for your own personal agressions. Tarysky (talk) 02:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Final warning for personal attacks posted to user's Talk Page. Other editors who may see this, check Talk Page's history, as User will undoubtedly remove it. - eo (talk) 02:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

No personal attacks were made against you. However, I'm going to correct that person when they are wrong. That's not a personal attack. Tarysky (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Unacceptable attack here: [4] and the above message left by Tarysky. All warnings removed from Tarysky's Talk Page by the user, as suspected. User was asked to stay off my Talk Page here [5] and here [6]. - eo (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments, websites, and more were explain. However, you took it as a personal attack. I'm trying to help correct you! I would stay off this page if you would listen to what is being said, but you refuse to listen to reason. I am now requesting your block for "definition of character" and "bad faith". Tarysky (talk) 03:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

You've been warned and asked before. Stay off my Talk Page and stop with the unacceptable attacks. You may also want to doublecheck your incorrect use of the phrase "definition of character". - eo (talk) 03:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

User:63.3.22.1

That IP you just blocked for 48 hours was once blocked for 6 months. They started vandalising soon after it expired. I have no reason to think this is a shared IP. Just get them of WP for some reasonable time (longer than 2 days). If they're a shared IP, they'll let you know. SBHarris 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Congrats

Wow. Its kind of a birthday gift. --Efe (talk) 05:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Discussion at WikiProject Record Charts

Please see this discussion and provide your opinion on proposed page moves. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Number-one albums of 1984 (U.S.) and 1985

Hi, by any chance you know some database where I can find a source for the missing weeks in this years, apparently Billboard dosen't have every week in its page and is almost impossible to find sources from those years (that are free). Thanks in advance. Frcm1988 (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

No, Im not suscribed; 12 weeks from 1984 when Purple Rain was number-one are missing, but since every week has the two previous weeks I put that source for the three weeks, but sometimes there are four or five straight weeks without a source; week of September 22, October 27, November 24 and December 01; from 1985 some of the weeks when Tears for Fears, Bryan Adams, Dire Straits and the Miami Vice soundtrack were number-one are missing, and I did the same in this list, but still there are missing references for the weeks August 17, October 26 and November 30. Frcm1988 (talk) 21:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

ok ill try and find it...one question though,once i find it how do i write it on the wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.159.237 (talk) 18:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

re: Heads up

Thanks for the heads-up—after the article moves and revamps, you may need to move- and creation-protect articles as necessary. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I've seen one of Billhit's edits reverted before. So he's one of those guys... Thanks for the information and the link. --Efe (talk) 00:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Making nasty things. --Efe (talk) 00:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I'll help you protecting them if they persist. --Efe (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps protect Template:US Albums also? Dabomb87 (talk) 03:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

No vandals as of now so it cannot be protected. It is not used for preemptive measures. --Efe (talk) 04:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I came here to inform you that another one of those socks had appeared, but you have taken care of the situation. Thought you might be interested in this discussion. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Heart This Man Is Mine.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Heart This Man Is Mine.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gwnz52 (talk) 18:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Heart These Dreams.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Heart These Dreams.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gwnz52 (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Heart Kick it Out.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Heart Kick it Out.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gwnz52 (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Heart IDWTNY.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Heart IDWTNY.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gwnz52 (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Heart AIWDIMLTY.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Heart AIWDIMLTY.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gwnz52 (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

GaGa Disc

Can you please take the semi-protect out. I see no vandilism. If you dont I will get someone with higher authority. Thanks, kind regards. Oh and can you take the photo off the disoc, it doesnt look goo the original was fine. Dance-pop (talk) 07:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Which album? I see no of her albums/EPs protected. --Efe (talk) 08:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I think he means the discography. It was semi-protected because I was removing WP:BADCHARTS on a daily basis for a while. I don't know anything about the image replacement, tho. - eo (talk) 10:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

OK. The header title seems misleading. --Efe (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

The lady gaga disocgraphy, so cahange it please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dance-pop (talk • contribs) 04:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Ciarafan247 is not a sockpuppet of Billhits

I have many sockpuppets as Billhits but Ciarafan247 is not one of them. So I don't know if you are responsible for that mistake in the "suspected sockpuppets of Billhits" or someone else is. But for Ciarafan's sake take them off that list because I would be loathe to prevent someone else from editing wikipedia!!! Thank You!!! Billhits —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.75.157 (talk) 22:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Immediate protection for Rihanna discography

Immediately. Continuous addition of WP:BADCHART and totall messing up of the discography. I'm working on reverting to a clean version but eo, please hurry up and protect it. "Legolas" (talk) 08:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Flo Rida - Right Round

Hello I know it doesn't say that but she is on the song on the cd cover. I know it isn't credible just because she says so on her space page which she does. There is an interview on by a radio station. Interview She confirms it on air and how Flo Rida asked her to come on the song, and how he has included her on another song on his album called 'Touch Me'. This website is alright Flo Rida Breaks Sales Record with 'Right Round' I'm sure there a lot more out there too if searched out. Maybe it's just worth adding some where that the singer is featured in the chorus. Raintheone (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

I moved it to there.Raintheone (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Greatz00

Hi Eo, could you please do something about this editor, even if it's a quiet little chat. He continually adds unsourced information to articles, and has received endless final warnings. I also noticed you tagged him as a suspected sock puppet last year. Any help is appreciated. Kind Regards. — R² 11:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Marmalade

I noticed {merge} flags on both the Marmalade and Dean Ford and the Gaylords pages back in August 2008. I added my full agreement to such a merger on both article's talk pages and, rather breezily, said that without any dissent from elsewhere, I would effect the merge procedure by the end of 2008. God knows why I did, because I have got cold feet. I do not think there is anything contentious, just that the procedure looks a little daunting to me. Could you oblige, or give me a fool's guide as to how to effect it. Do not lead me to the Wiki help pages for mergers - that gave the cold feet in the first place. Your obedient, cack handed and addled old fool,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 18:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Kokuna

Please take a look at Kokuna (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). He's been warned several times about the United World Chart, but it doesn't seem to be sinking in.—Kww(talk) 13:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I've dropped him a final warning for his last stunt, where he created a duplicate of that article based on the United World Chart. Well worth keeping an eye on.—Kww(talk) 17:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

New Amerykah Part Two (Return of the Ankh)

Time to redirect or AfD I feel. What you think? — R² 13:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

To prevent controversy, I would that you stay away from my talk page. All request and comments have been removed due to your behavior earlier. Tarysky (talk) 21:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

If you continue to make edits that are unacceptable and accuse me of "vandalism" in your edit summaries, I will not hesitate to leave appropriate warnings on your Talk Page, it's that simple. - eo (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Record Charts

We have two unresolved threads. Please visit. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 04:34, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Romanian Singles Chart

Hello! Would you stop removing the Romanian Top 100? It is not a "bad-chart". Alecsdaniel (talk) 10:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Billboard

Hi, thanks for the link. That was actually the question I send to them like a month ago, I thought they will never answer it. I totally forgot about it. Ha ha, can't believe my name is there. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I do now. Again thanks for the link. Frcm1988 (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Takin' Back My Love

I'm having to travel to Curacao today for a doctor's appointment, so I won't be able to practice my usual bad-chart vigilance. I'd appreciate it if you kept an eye on Takin' Back My Love starting at about 10PM GMT: there's been an Iranian editor putting in an enormous pile of bad charts, and his block expires around then.

One interesting new toy: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchFilter=81 will show you a list of every edit that has added a bad chart since the filter went in place yesterday. I took care of everything up to

• 06:53, 24 March 2009: 124.104.139.42 (talk) triggered filter 81, performing the action "edit" on Myx. Actions taken: none; Filter description: Badcharts

You might want to check that periodically.—Kww(talk) 10:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Billboard milestones (19 weeks on top)

"Most consecutive weeks at #1," even with multiple singles, is a matter of some chartwatching interest. (Other people have put in edits about the subject before.) It seems the most logical to connect it to one of the related lists. Or do you think it belongs as a separate item in "Additional achievements"? I know that you've preferred to keep that section under control whenever possible. (I'm a longtime anonymous IP contributor to the page.) I don't see why a 19-week run at #1 wouldn't belong somewhere on the page. I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts on the matter. Thanks!208.120.7.152 (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Brazilian charts again

I draw your attention here.—Kww(talk) 12:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[7] made on April 3 2009 to Takin' Back My Love

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley (talk) 21:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. Misread timestamps. But you really should be reverting less there, as I'm sure you know William M. Connolley (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks - more on your talk page. - eo (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Pussycat Dolls discography

Would you be able to help out with an edit war going on between me and Anon. users regarding singles listed on this discography? Please see the article's talk page. Maybe a protection from anon edits? Thanks.--Design (talk) 12:27, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

• thanks for your help so far!--Design (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem, I've put it on my watchlist. - eo (talk) 10:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello again , could you, or the members of wikiproject Record Charts, please comment on the discussion currently happening on the Pussycat Dolls discography talk page re definition singles, "Main" singles, "promotional" singles and so on? Thanks--Design (talk) 12:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:ANI notification

There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Song_articles_incidents about your editing. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

User:189.248.2.202

Hi! User 189.248.2.202 (talk · contribs) continues to vandalize Raven-Symoné-related pages, including This Is My Time and Raven-Symoné discography. Not only does s/he keep insistently undoing my edits claiming "vandalism" and making edits which go against several guidelines, but s/he is also a suspected sockpuppet. Since you are an administrator and have warned him/her once, I thought you could perhaps do something about it. Thanks! Funk Junkie (talk) 21:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Romanian Top 100

RT100 is not a bad chart! Alecsdaniel (talk) 15:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Donna Summer

Hey there, I've noticed that some people have been changing Donna Summer's total #1s on the Club Play chart page (again, I think), which is probably getting to be a nuisance. I just added a note to the bottom of the Donna Summer discography page that hopefully explains that 15 #1s is right. If you get a minute and can check it out, let me know what you think. Take it easy. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 06:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Boom Boom Pow

Billboard leaked the number one for tomorrow's chart: http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/black-eyed-peas-score-first-no-1-on-hot-1003960617.story. —Kww(talk) 19:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Lady Gaga discography

No Eric, I'm afraid no mediater has come and the user has now resorted to canvassing other users like Love.Game, Child Funk and Ninjachucks not to mention a complete disregard for the policies which make up Wikipedia. Its like the same situation with you, anything not by his way the user starts his ranting. Anyways I believe a protection of the Discography page is necessary from new users and IPs as such vandalism and table messing up is continuing. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Cool. NP. I've had enough of drama from this user. Seriously I have better things to do at here than entertain such theatrics. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:Bananarama Venus picture disc.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bananarama Venus picture disc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

That IP you've been arguing with

Pretty sure it's JuStar:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JuStar has been reopened.—Kww(talk) 18:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)‎

Haven't really been arguing, but good catch. I saw the investigation page - is this IP being blocked, I hope? - eo (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Already blocked for a month.—Kww(talk) 19:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Modern Rock Tracks

If you read the page The Kill, you can read "The song broke a record on Billboard's Modern Rock Tracks chart, The Kill spent 52 weeks on the chart." So you don't changes the page.--Dear87 (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)