User talk:Ephitran

April 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If a Scientific Peer Review Journal is not objectively valid, What else?

Your edits could be considered citation spam. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not what you want to add, it is how you are adding it. A journal article does not belong in See also. Putting double brackets [[ ]] around the article title just makes it worse, as it creates a red Wikilink. Those are intended for names of things or people that may warrant becoming a Wikipedia article. If the journal article contains information relevant to the topic, then a sentence or sentences should be added to the text of the article. The journal becomes a reference. David notMD (talk) 19:21, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having read the article (three times) my opinion is that lab-only testing is premature to incorporate into the Wikipedia article. David notMD (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author: I have talked to the journals, They all wanted, objective, reproducible proof in using Control vs Experiment protocols in control environments means LAB base. And I took me 6 years to satisfy their demands. With the my physical conditions I have no intend to "make money", but to have freedom staying in the obscure. Both You and I know, (if this works- It does) it is the game changer. It it the community's waste of time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ephitran (talk • contribs) 19:55, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AGAIN, it does not belong in "See also." If you wish to try again, write a sentence or two in the text of the article and make the journal article a reference. David notMD (talk) 21:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having a conflict of interest - in this instance wanting to add a journal article that you wrote to several Wikipedia articles - means that you are restricted to proposing text change and the reference at the Talk page of the article, for a dis-involved editor to decide to include or not. David notMD

(talk) 21:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I did not mean that. Thanks David. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ephitran (talk • contribs) 21:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ephitran, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ephitran! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

August 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello moderators. With more then 700 million illnesses, tens million human lives lost every year caused by mosquitoes, that contribute to 2 millions illnesses and 28 thousand human deaths a day, every day. And if for each patient 3 healthy immediate family members/relatives encounter more hardship or their welfare reduced, we are talking 1 third of the world population have their welfare reduced by them.

Wikipedia was established for knowledge sharing, academic purpose. Among all the articles of the organization this article have the most consequentially novel mission; saving live, saving life not in the few but in the mass. For the mission it opt to inform the public of any reasonable method that a reader can apply to save him/herself or the life of of his/her family member. we will have some senses of success it it can reach a few, one life, one illness at the time. Regardless who is the posting person, not necessary me.. Thanks Phi.

Hello, Ephitran. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 13:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask you a question?

As of secondary sources, I have Europe PMC on their rown evaluate and indexed my repreprint even without my knowledge. I don't have to pay APC $450.00 cost like verybody else.

Is it considered rollable? Anyway, it has my name there I don't want to self cite. Ephitran (talk) 13:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello moderator. With more then 700 million illnesses, tens million human lives lost every year caused by mosquitoes, that contribute to 2 millions illnesses and 28 thousand human deaths a day, every day.

Wikipedia was established for knowledge sharing, academic purpose. Among all the articles of the organization this article have the most consequential novel mission; saving live, saving life not in the few but in the mass. For the mission it opt to inform the public of any reasonable method that a reader can apply to save him/herself or the life of of his/her family member. we will have some senses of success it it can reach a few, one life, one illness at the time. Regardless who is the posting person.. Thanks Phi. Ephitran (talk) 09:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have fundamentally misunderstood what Wikipedia is and what it is for. It is a summary of those materials that meet its sourcing requirements. It is not an indiscriminate collection of information or a place to post your original research. MrOllie (talk) 13:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 13:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]