User talk:King of the North East

Archives

What happend?

What happend? Where are you? I hate to see a friend of mine leaving... E-mail me if you want. FkpCascais (talk) 19:16, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Is great to see you back, I really hope you are here to stay. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I'm still considering my options. I doubt I'll ever be as active as I was before, I've got a lot of commitments elsewhere. But it would seem a shame to leave at 1,413 articles.... I should at least get to 1,500 eh? King of the North East 20:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you come back only part time, it is better than none at all. I think 1,500 is a nice number, but I really hope you get to 2,000 or perhaps more, anyways as stated before it is Great to have you back. I also would like to say that you are and were the inspiration to a lot of us at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentine football, without you that project might not even exit, so thank you for all the time and effort you have put into it. Regards--Bocafan76 (talk) 20:47, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Idem Bocafan. Argentine football missed you. Fache (talk) 23:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw you on my watchlist. Welcome back! -- Alexf^(talk) 10:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermark

Please, do not use the site as a reference. It just a community site just like wikipedia. I often found their transfer fee was wrong (and often had a wrong transfer record). Please use a news/article reported by reliable media instead. Matthew_hk t c 11:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall ever using it as a reference, but I do occasionally add the Transfermarkt profile in the External links section as it often contains more data on Argentine players than the usual reliable sources which are heavily restricted by pay walls. 13:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Córdoba

HI, I've nominated this for TFD. It can easily be replaced by infobox settlements. Hope this is OK by you.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, fine mate. Kill it King of the North East 20:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Ohaco

No worries - I've restored it. Bizarrrely someone translated what you wrote exactly into Spanish (or at least that what it looks like to me), and then it seems to have been copied by this website directly from Wikipedia (as it still includes the citation numbers and the Infobox coding!). Number 5 7 08:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate. King of the North East 21:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

José Yudica

Hello King! I have a doubt about the date of birth of this famous coach. In en.wiki it appears that he was born on 1936, while in es.wiki it appears that he was born on 1937. In your opinion, which is the "truth" about this matter? I know that it's always very difficult to research data regarding former South American players and coach, anyway, if you know something more, please, inform me! --VAN ZANT (talk) 21:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to the usually reliable Historia de boca it is 1936 Regards King of the North East 22:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Could you please tell me how many football player articles you have created so far? Thank you in advance. BineMai 21:40, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not much idea, I haven't really kept track as well as I would have liked but certainly more than 656 biographies. I am most proud of some of the retired player articles that did not even have comprehensive profiles in any Spanish language sources. I have aslo added infoboxes, references additional stats and prose to thousands more biographies that were not written comprehensively or accurately in the first place. I am virtually retired now. Can I ask why you are interested? King of the North East 00:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. The reason i asked is because i saw many footballer articles from South America started by you and i was simply curious. BineMai 17:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

León Strembel

Hello again King. I'm glad to see you're still editing and very happy you improved this article. I started a couple articles about Jewish Argentine footballers after noticing their entries in a book, but I didn't do a good job of researching their entire careers. I'm going to take another shot at improving them, but I'm glad you improved this one. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 02:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Footy

Hi, it´s allways so great to see you! Many thanks for your kind words and your proposal is interesting. I doubt that anything will come out from there, but I was really hoping I would get some sort of green-light for temporarily turning the infoboxes to old format while clerly incomplete at begining. Strangely, people reacted as if I was proposing some crime... :) FkpCascais (talk) 12:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work

Football (soccer) barnstar

For your continued good work on football articles. Keep up the good work! Bryan Anderson (talk) 02:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julio Olarticoechea.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Julio Olarticoechea.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Attilio Demaria.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Attilio Demaria.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

River Skerne

The River Skerne article, which you created in 2006 was recently nominated for deletion, which you were not informed about. I closed the AfD as a snow keep, as rivers are held to be inherently notable and capable of sustaining articles. That said, the nomination reason was WP:OR. Whilst I'm unable to judge the veracity of this, the article is completely unreferenced and I've tagged it as such. Obviously, in six years, you will have learnt a lot about Wikipedia and how it works. Would you mind revisiting the article and adding some references please? Mjroots (talk) 08:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Luisgalvan.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Luisgalvan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avallay.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Avallay.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —innotata 02:14, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Gold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Into the Blue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Salford City Reds

Category:Salford City Reds, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mattlore (talk) 02:57, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Atlético Junior footballers

Category:Atlético Junior footballers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Atlético Junior managers

Category:Atlético Junior managers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Atlético Junior

Category:Atlético Junior, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:50, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:CatterickRailwayBridge2.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Universidad de Chile squad

Hi King of the North East, look I’m Ulof4 from Chile, and can I ask you something, could you protect this template from a probably attack from an user called Alechuncho or vandals eventually, because that (Universidad de Chile squad) its switchable template and reviewing the history of River Plate squad which you created it on January 1st, 2009, I bring the same switchable system to Chilean football pages a year later and now in 2015 all the teams from first tier and second tier — except O'Higgins and Universidad de Chile — have it, so would you please help me? — User:Ulof4 (talk), Santiago, Chile, September 29th, 2015.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of footballers born in Argentina who have played for other national teams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of footballers born in Argentina who have played for other national teams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of footballers born in Argentina who have played for other national teams until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Barcelona Sporting Club has been nominated for discussion

Category:Barcelona Sporting Club, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Pato-Castillo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pato-Castillo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 16:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Partido Argentina

Template:Infobox Partido Argentina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sporting Punta Alta.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sporting Punta Alta.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:José Omar Pastoriza.jpg

The file File:José Omar Pastoriza.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Space Raiders

Template:Space Raiders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 02:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of José Diego Álvarez (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on José Diego Álvarez (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jgfunes.gif

The file File:Jgfunes.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Almagro footballers has been nominated for renaming

Category:Almagro footballers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 21:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Yesso Amalfi" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Yesso Amalfi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 7#Yesso Amalfi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 09:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cramble Cross for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cramble Cross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cramble Cross until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sarrail (talk) 02:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alejandro Scopelli.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alejandro Scopelli.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 09:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jorgeborelli.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jorgeborelli.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 10:22, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jorge Carrascosa.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jorge Carrascosa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Martín Gaitán for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martín Gaitán is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martín Gaitán until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shinadamina (talk) 20:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Merlo, Buenos Aires has been nominated for merging

Category:Merlo, Buenos Aires has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 05:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Escudo de Camarones.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Escudo de Camarones.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 05:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]