User talk:Emma knows it well

Welcome!

Hi Emma knows it well! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 15:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kirill Kondrashin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If your statement that his defection was "likely to be related to personal matters" is on the record, please cite the source you took that from. If it is your own interpretation of events, this is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Belbury (talk) 08:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Game scores

When you add a chess game score to an article, please add spaces between the moves. As you can see, the game you added to Murray Chandler is illegible due to lack of spaces. (I have already fixed the game you added to Vasily Smyslov Sr.) Bruce leverett (talk) 02:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful with the original research

Alejandro Ramírez is playing OTB today in Columbia. Your unsourced edit introduced objectively incorrect information. Particularly in a BLP, and particularly in the BLP of an accused sex offender, please keep WP:NOR in mind with all your unsourced edits. Miner Editor (talk) 13:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Den Vau

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Den Vau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robo^Cric Let's chat 11:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RoboCric Hi. I wonder if I can update it little by little? I actually created a page without content and deleted, then created another one and translated about his early life and some parts of info box. I am not sure if this message is about the deleted one or the new one. Emma knows it well (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion notice was about the former one, which had been deleted by an admin. Thanks. Robo^Cric Let's chat 09:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Yelena Isinbayeva, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Renat 12:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leon Lederman (chess player) (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Losipov was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources used only show stats regarding event participation. The information regarding his personal life (ex: being born in Ukraine) remains unverified and unsourced. He might be notable, but more sources are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leon Lederman (chess player) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Losipov (talk) 05:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emma knows it well! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Losipov (talk) 05:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Emma knows it well. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Seems nearly all your edits are including mentions of Michael Baron across Wikipedia articles. Wanted to confirm you don't have a conflict of interest regarding that person. Thanks. ZimZalaBim ^talk 15:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Zim

I do not know Michael Baron personally, just been reading his articles when in Vietnam so decided to translate his wiki from Vietnamese.

thank you so much for your guidance,

Emma Emma knows it well (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be adding a lot of trivial content about Michael Baron and now starting to insert just random links to what appears to be his consulting company. Please be aware of our notability guidelines at WP:ACADEMIC and also about inserting promotional links at WP:SPAM and WP:EL. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 01:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ZimZalaBim,

I have been reading about disclose conflict of interest but cannot understand well the next steps to do. Also, is it important to make the translation match with the original Vietnamese version? Because after the community update my translation, I think it is less similar to the original Vietnamese post. Emma knows it well (talk) 04:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not the article is similar to its Vietnamese version is irrelevant, as we need to follow the guidelines here at the English Wikipedia. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 14:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. Noted. I better not edit it further before understanding the guidelines better and stick to the original translation from the vietnamese wiki.

thank you heaps for guidance. Emma knows it well (talk) 01:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain how you came to possess the rights to this close-range photo of Baron? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the Michael Baron AfD, you stated that you found the image on Google. If that is correct, then its image licensing is not correctly filed, as you claimed it as your "own work". However, I'm unable to find the image in question online in a reverse image search; can you please clarify where this image is from? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about the Licence Agreement. I did not fill the form correctly. Emma knows it well (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michael Baron

Hello, Emma knows it well. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Baron, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Baron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Baron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Baron (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Emma knows it well. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I do not understand what the issue you can see I was regularly editing and there is one account. Emma knows it well (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]