User talk:Emilywlk

Wikipedia ads	file info – #69

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamont Sincere (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Exemplo347 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lamont Sincere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Exemplo347 (talk) 00:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Emilywlk, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Exemplo347 (talk) 00:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Emilywlk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Emilywlk, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Emilywlk

This will deleted as a test as it is malformed. Also, on reviewing your editing history, it is clear that your request would not be successful. Adminship requires 1000's edits and many years of hard work. Maybe in the future. Dlohcierekim 06:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamont Sincere (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lamont Sincere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 20:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamont Sincere (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pariah24 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lamont Sincere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pariah24 (talk) 04:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamont Sincere (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RileyBugz was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lamont Sincere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 00:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamont Sincere (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lamont Sincere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft submissions

Hey, just a few quick notes regarding Draft:Lamont Sincere: first, please do not remove old decline notices, as it allows new reviewers to see how the article has progressed since creation. Second, when you submit the draft, please place {{subst:submit}} at the top of the page instead of copying old submission templates, as this will perform the submission properly with the right time and attribution. If you have any questions please let me know. Primefac (talk) 12:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove old draft decline notices. Continuing to do so will result in a temporary block from editing. Primefac (talk) 14:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure how much clearer Primefac could have been but your most recent edit that removed the declines and resubmitted with absolutely no changes addressing the issues is becoming a nuisance and is a waste of other editors time. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Consider this your final warning. I have no issues with you working on drafts, or submitting drafts, or editing Wikipedia in a productive manner. But at AFC we have rules and guidelines regarding submission and decline notices, and if you choose to repeatedly go against those norms you will be blocked from editing for being disruptive. Primefac (talk) 21:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Emilywlk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Paid editing on Wikipedia

I noticed you added this note to something under construction indicating it might be paid editing. Please read this.

Hello Emilywlk. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Emilywlk. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Emilywlk|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello I am not getting paid for editing. I just left a link in my sandbox to read information about it. Ive removed the template from my sandbox and saved it in my watchlist instead. Emilywlk (talk) 18:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Party Tour (2017) has been accepted

The Party Tour (2017), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 12:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2x Entertainment (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2x Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2x Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warehouse Music Group (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warehouse Music Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Warehouse Music Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 03:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Emily, you questioned my comment at your application for addition to the list of AfC reviewers. I'm sorry, but if you cannot even review your own work correctly, why should you be trusted to review others' works? The above article made no showing whatsoever of notability. It also contained at least one incomplete sentence, and it contains promotional language, something you have been cautioned about in the past. Please do not waste other editors' time with frivolous requests for permissions. You are clearly not qualified for AfC reviewer, if for no other reason than simply not meeting the base qualifications, and you've made at least two requests for it. That on top of an absolutely frivolous attempt at WP:RFA, something I am probably not quite qualified for with six years experience and almost 70,000 edits, give the appearance that you may be WP:Hat collecting, something that is considered disruptive. Also, you've been questioned about paid editing in the past. Repeated attempts to gain reviewer rights that you are not qualified for tends to reinforce the notion that maybe your work is not being done with the intention of improving Wikipedia, but instead to further your own goals. I am not saying you were not telling the truth when you denied paid editing; rather just that repeatedly asking for the right to approve articles may reinforce others suspicions. Anyone can edit Wikipedia, but to truly learn the skills needed for advanced permissions takes time and practice. Please stop asking for advance permissions until you have more experience. Thanks. Hope 2018 treats you well, and gives you the time to gain the needed experience. John from Idegon (talk) 03:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you John from Idegon for taking the time pointing out things that I need to learn before being a AfC reviewer in the future. I like Wikipedia a lot as you can see and I just want to help out. I understand your concerns. This is just all a learning experience and process for me to gain more knowledge of the Wiki world. You have to make mistakes to learn from your mistakes and I'm definitely learning from them. Once again thank you for breaking everything down for me. I will check back for permission when I'm completely ready. Emilywlk (talk) 04:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

One of the best ways to gain understanding of what makes for notability is to see what doesn't. To that end, I'd suggest journeying over to Articles for deletion. Read the intro page and the instructions on how to nominate and how to comment, and then spend a couple weeks just reading the discussions, following at least a couple that interest you all the way through from nomination to closing. I'd suggest holding off on actually !voting until you've become familiar with the lay of the land. Of course, reading all the notability guidelines is a must, and remember that notability is based in the pillar requirement of verifiability. We require multiple good references because you need multiple good references to write a complete article. A wise man told me how to create articles here (and truth be told, I do not do that much. Most of my time is given over to fighting vandalism and updating and improving existing articles.)

1. Use what you know to lead you to sources for what you want to write about.
2. Look at the sources you have and decide if they meet our standards for reliable sources.
3. Look at your sources and determine if they are truly academically independent of the subject you are writing about. Things that aren't are: the subject's website; the subject's employer's website; anything based on an interview with the subject or a principal of the subject; anything obviously written off a press release (look for promo language, no byline on the article, certain publications that specialize in posting press releases, like PRNewswire, and trade magazines)
4. Once you have done all that, and this is the important part, FORGET EVERYTHING YOU ALREADY KNOW.
5. Proceed to write your article, paraphrasing what your sources have said. If it isn't in the sources, it shouldn't be in the article. Remember that you cannot take what source A says, and what source B says, and conclude that therefore C must be true. Somebody somewhere has to have written "C".

I hope you find this bit of wisdom helpful. Credit for it goes to a fella that is a regular host at TEAHOUSE, a relatively new administrator named Cullen328. Thanks for what you do, and for wanting to do more. Some of us are willing to help you learn. Just ask. My dear ol dad (RIP) liked to say, "The only dumb question is the one you do not ask". Doubly true here. John from Idegon (talk) 23:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Casanova (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Samuel Jimenez has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Samuel Jimenez. Thanks! L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Jimenez (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Power~enwiki was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samuel Jimenez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samuel Jimenez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamont Sincere (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lamont Sincere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lamont Sincere, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 06:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Lamont Sincere

Draft:Lamont Sincere, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lamont Sincere and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Lamont Sincere during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 18:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamont Sincere (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lamont Sincere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lamont Sincere, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BlocBoy JB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smash David (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Smash David and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Smash David, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 18:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lamont Sincere, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brownsville and Crown Heights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Warehouse Music Group moved to draftspace

You saw the note by the reviewing editor, I assume? Please do address the issue - you need independent, in-depth sources, not promotional, superficial, or in-house coverage. If the draft reappears in mainspace in this condition, it will likely be out put up for deletion for lack of demonstrated notability more or less immediately. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Ok thank you. I appreciate the feedback Emilywlk (talk) 11:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2x Entertainment

Hello, Emilywlk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2x Entertainment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CoolSkittle (talk) 19:43, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Emilywlk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Warehouse Music Group

Hello, Emilywlk. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Warehouse Music Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 20:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Commissary (album)

Hello, Emilywlk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Commissary (album).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Nya Lee

Hello, Emilywlk,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nya Lee should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nya Lee .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 06:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Smash David

Hello, Emilywlk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Smash David".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 12:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Equity Distribution

Hello, Emilywlk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Equity Distribution".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 18:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

paid editing/coi

You have previously denied any connection but I am going to ask once more - what is your connection to Lamont Sincere? CUPIDICAE💕 18:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

You're continuing to edit without responding to this. This isn't an optional inquiry. If you do not respond, I will request a block of your account after filing a WP:COIN case. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I do apologize for the late response. To answer the question above I don’t have any relations with Lamont Sincere as I have been working on this account for years. I don’t do this for money. This was a little project of my own that gave me practice to learn how to use Wikipedia. By practicing in creating this account I was able to create other pages such as Smash David and plenty of others. Being an element to help create and edit was a goal and I thank you and all the other Wikipidians for you assistance. It would be an honor for you to unblock my IP address as I will continue to create and edit with you all. Emilywlk (talk) 20:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Then how is this this and this your own work? PRAXIDICAE💕 21:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes this is my work as this isn’t for money. I’m just a true Wikipian creating accounts for my purposes only. And that’s the honest truth. I take picture and create accounts. As well as with Smash David I have no relations. Didn’t take picture of him but I’ve created an amazing Wikipedia page that I am proud of. Like this is a passion of mine and I came a long way to learn how to use this platform through trail and error with the help for your guys. Emilywlk (talk) 21:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Frankly, I don't believe you but it's evident you at minimum have a conflict of interest, which you are required to disclose. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I understand your concerns. As you can see the history I’ve been striving to create this account. I had people like yourself teach me while I made some errors. I’m not a friend, family member nor work for Lamont Sincere. The other accounts I’ve created or edit as well I have no relations. This is only for my purpose only. When ever I get a chance I’ll reach out to Lamonts contact to take a picture on my own to continue my journey to create this account. This is a special project of mine and I’m proud of myself. I don’t have any relations with Lamont Sincere. Please let me continue create and enjoy creating account with you guys. That’s the only thing a girls ask. I love Wikipedia. Emilywlk (talk) 21:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm going to ask this once more: what is your connection to Sincere and his management? Your claim that you have no connection is demonstrably untrue based on the images you uploaded as well as the tickets you've sent in. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I reach out for my purpose only. Don’t know them on personal level nor for payment. Please don’t do this to me. I worked really hard on this learning and piecing things together. Look at the history. I’m proud how this came out. I said to myself I will be dedicated to this and really build this up on my own as this was a project of mine. I just continue to work on it thats all. I’m about really cry right now. OMG. Can’t believe this is happening. Emilywlk (talk) 21:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Again, how is it that you were able to take professional photos in a private studio - per your own uploads but don't know Sincere? A truthful answer is all you need. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

This is a passionate project of mine with all my heart. Reaching out and finding how to get it done. Contacting them was hard not knowing if they are going to respond and say yes meet me here. I was shock to meet Mixed by Ali. OMG. God and the universe is good. The greatest day of my life. I did this because I was on a mission to see if I can keep up with it and told them my mission. That was my main goal. Once again I understand that you want the truth and with all honesty this is my own work of art to create this page and more in the feature. I just want to continue to go on my path and create. From this page now I’m able to contribute and create with you all. Thats all I want to do. I’m begging you please can remove codind from the top of the page as I’m not getting paid for this. It’s like a stab to the heart. Also to let you know I created 24hrs page as well and I don’t know him at all nor have any relations to him. OMG. This is making me sad.Emilywlk (talk) 22:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Josh Gudwin

Hello, Emilywlk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Josh Gudwin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Josh Gudwin

Hello, Emilywlk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Josh Gudwin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)