User talk:Emely Cooper

This is Emely Cooper's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linebet (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linebet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emely Cooper! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Emely Cooper, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Emely Cooper|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 11:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear moderator,

I would like to emphasize that the article is written in a neutral style, in accordance with the principles of Wikipedia. I have sought to provide objective information based on verifiable sources and avoiding subjective assessments.

I would also like to note that there are no advertising elements in the text, and I did not have any financial interests or hidden payments that could influence the content of the article. My interest is to improve the quality of information on Wikipedia.

If you have specific examples of fragments of the article that raise doubts, I would be grateful if you could point them out so that I could make the necessary corrections and improvements.

Thank you for your work and understanding.

Best regards,

Emily Cooper Emely Cooper (talk) 11:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a "moderator" what ever that may be? You have not answered the question the draft merely tells us veverything the company wants us to know about them. "The platform boasts a user base" clearly isn't neutral tone either. Theroadislong (talk) 11:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I do not receive any direct or indirect compensation for my edits. I have no financial interest in promoting the topic. Emely Cooper (talk) 11:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the incorrect wording of my text. That's not what I meant. I meant that the company has 400,000 users. Emely Cooper (talk) 11:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I continue editing? Emely Cooper (talk) 11:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious to know why you came to write this promotional draft? Theroadislong (talk) 11:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Initially, I enjoyed following the career of Djibril Cisse. When I recently found out about his cooperation with this company, I wanted to know more about it. But I did not find a Wikipedia page that would help me get acquainted with this company. I read a lot of different Wikipedia articles, because I find this platform comfortable. I decided to collect all the information myself and write an article about this gambling company, because I believe that its activities and influence on the gambling industry are significant and interesting for a wide audience. Emely Cooper (talk) 11:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing again

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 11:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linebet (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linebet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]