User talk:EmanWilm

Welcome!

Hello, EmanWilm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Lra drama 09:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sociology of food

A tag has been placed on Sociology of food, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Victao lopes (talk) 23:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am the administrator reviewing this speedy delete request. I have declined it because I noticed it was added only 2 minutes after the article was first created, which may not have given you time to add any significant content. Please fill the article in soon if you wish to add additional content. If it remains in an empty state after a day or so, it can be deleted then. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Births / year of birth missing categorization

Hi! I've noticed you doing excellent work going through people needing birth cats - thank you! Am I right that you're keeping people you've put in Category:Year of birth missing (living people) up on those pages? I'd envisaged deleting those ones too, so others could see that they had been processed: what do you think would be most useful? Dsp13 (talk) 16:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Births / year of birth missing categorization

Yes, I am currently working on removing people who are listed in Living people needing categorization by year of birth, which have been classified under (xxxx births). I had considered also (as you mentioned) removing those within Category:Year of birth missing (living people), but since they had not (technically) been "categorized by year of birth", I decided to leave them. As far as useful, I think having them in both increases the likelihood of proper categorization, and I have been putting them in Category:Year of birth missing (living people). If you do decide to remove those, let me know, and I won't bother, and thanks. EmanWilm (talk) 17:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you do want to leave them, maybe when you get to the end of a batch you could mark the ones left as having been categorised in this way - e.g. Batch XX 'only year of birth missing (living people) remaining' or whatever - just so people who come to the page will know the status of the different batches there. What do you think? Dsp13 (talk) 23:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'll label them appropriately EmanWilm (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have added this info right under the batch numbers for the ones I've completed so far (batches 11-15):

only red links or year of birth missing (living people) remaining

let me know what you think.--FeanorStar7 (talk) 22:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That should stop us wasting effort by going over the same material. I'm afraid I'd quite like to continue simply deleting the batches which I've gone through - it's a bit quicker, and the backlog is so huge that I just want to attack it as quickly as possible. If you've got strong objections to that, then do let me know, & I'll fall into line! Dsp13 (talk) 23:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what EmanWilm said on his talk page about leaving the ones with year of birth missing in place because otherwise they might slip thru the net; on the other hand that category is there and if someone is working thru that list they will see it. If the person is not in the LC authority file, I don't do much more searching since there are so many; but there are times when I think it will be likely the birth date will be in the file (if the person is a published writer or musician) and usually I can get a birth year and thus can improve the page; so I don't have strong feelings, just observations. Anyway, my 2 pennies. -- FeanorStar7 (talk) 06:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Using Dschwen's excellent Link & category intersection tool allows a query for living writers with year of birth missing (takes a while, returns 1500 or so results) which looks good for running past the LC authority file.Dsp13 (talk) 12:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

World Future Council

I'm wondering why you've removed this category from Ibrahim Abouleish's page? Is he no longer part of the council? hgilbert (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I see the category has disappeared. hgilbert (talk) 21:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rookie of the Year (album)

This edit is inexplicable to me. Yes, the category needed to be created, but it is standard to have a category for "Artist name albums". I've reverted it and created the category. If my actions were erronious, please let me know. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Place of birth missing

Hi. I noticed you are adding Category:Place of birth missing. This category (and the one for living people as well) has to be place in talk pages. Please read instructions given in the category's page. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 00:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I checked on what you wrote, you are correct about Category:Place of birth missing, and I will go back in by edits and make any corrections I can find. However, Category:Place of birth missing (living people) is in fact, to be placed on article pages alongside Category:Living people. Thanks for the message. EmanWilm (talk) 23:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Place of birth missing (living people) reads "This category is for the discussion pages of living individuals whose place of birth is not indicated." So it goes to talk pages as well-- Magioladitis (talk) 23:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'newpaper'

thanks for clearing up my spelling errors, can't believe i copy-pasted 'newpaper' four times in a row. --Soman (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:111th Congress Senator James Risch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:111th Congress Senator James Risch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oops EmanWilm (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Wong

Hello. The Teresa Wong article you contributed to is now up for deletion - unfairly I feel. Please check out its talk page and see what you think about it. Much appreciated. Cyclotron (talk) 08:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiBirthday

I saw from here that it's been exactly two years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 20:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Stephen Moorer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Stephen Moorer, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Moorer. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Amadscientist (Contact Me, My Contribs) 07:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 August 8

You were trying to nominate a template but you didn't do it properly and broke the code. Which one were you trying to do? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vogue Templates

You have edited some of these in the past so please comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_August_14#Vogue_covers.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 12:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PROD removed from CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I have removed the dated PROD template from CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. PROD is for articles only, not for redirects. Redirects may be taken to WP:Redirects for discussion. Cnilep (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, noted, thank you.

Your opinion is welcome at WP:Redirects for discussion#CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, where CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER is currently being discussed. Cnilep (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Capitalisation/42

I've been working my way through this page, but I'm going to stop for now because I see you editing it, too. Would you mind letting me know if you plan to finish it, so we don't conflict? Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 08:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no. I will continue to edit those pages as I see fit, this is a team effort, and I have absolutely no intention of altering how I work, simply because you were working on the same page. If there is a conflict, there is a really simple solution, hit the refresh button. I have been working on ALL the pages, for months. Thank you for your help with the project, but if you have any further comments on my work, please keep them to yourself. EmanWilm (talk) 16:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa! I wasn't commenting on your work, I was trying to coordinate what we were doing. Sorry for bothering you: I'll try to remember that you don't care to coordinate. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation links repair

Hi, I noticed you changed the link on Pinchas Menachem Alter to Bar Mitzva. Just wanted to let you know that the actual page is called Bar and Bat Mitzvah. Yoninah (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates with red links.

Hi. Please don't remove templates from the 2005 TRL pages. Their presence on those pages indicates that they are very old redlinks, and should be given top priority. Cheers! bd2412 T 20:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK EmanWilm (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's fine to remove things from the 2006 pages, they are just a snapshot of no particular importance now. bd2412 T 20:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see now, it turns out that if I had taken 10 seconds and read what was at the top of the page... yeah, sorry about that. EmanWilm (talk) 00:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No big deal. I'm glad you're helping on this project, it's one of the bigger ones. bd2412 T 00:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Template:WPC copyright guide

Hi there, I just noticed that this template has been deleted without even notifying me as creator that it was up for discussion. This was not an exact duplication of Template:WPOCopyright despite their visual similarity. This would have been evident if anyone had bothered to check all the links. Note also that it was not unused. It was transcluded here. They contained different links for Online research in the Guides section. Template:WPC copyright guide linked to a different Guide which was written for the needs of Wikipedia:WikiProject Composers. What's done is done, and I've got round the problem by linking the two different Guides in Template:WPOCopyright, although cumbersome. But I would greatly appreciate it if you would please not propose for deletion Template:WPC online research. This one likewise is especially adapted for WikiProject Composers despite its visual simlarity to Template:WPO online research. Or if you do, please leave a notice on my talk page. Thanks, Voceditenore (talk) 14:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm sorry I missed one, tragic.EmanWilm (talk) 14:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Get off your high horse

ok? (64.252.34.115 (talk) 13:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]

HA! Hilarious! EmanWilm (talk) 13:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jailhouselogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jailhouselogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential election in Alaska, 1996

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of United States presidential election in Alaska, 1996, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: United States presidential election in Wyoming, 1996. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, United States presidential election in Alaska, 1996

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, United States presidential election in Alaska, 1996. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - [[:]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Shadowjams (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, United States presidential election in Alaska, 1996

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, United States presidential election in Alaska, 1996. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - [[:]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Shadowjams (talk) 10:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential Elections

First I would like to say thanks for contributing to presidential elections at the state level. I have worked my tail off over the years to create and add information about presidential election results at the state level. I'm really happy to see more wikipedia contributers. Just a few suggestions:

In the infobox, remember that a candidate needs at least 5% of the vote. Ross Perot fits this criteria in most states in 1992 and 1996. However, Nader hit that threshold in only a few states in 2000.
In the infobox, only one decimal point is needed (for example it's 5.8% not 5.77%)
Try to add as much information as possible. In the 2004 presidential election, I put pre-election predictions, polls, campaign visits, etc. The more information, the better.
Look at the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections at the state level. Refer to them.

Thanks a lot. Continue the good work!--Jerzeykydd (talk) 22:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited United States presidential election in Washington, 1996, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington and Charles Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited United States presidential election in Connecticut, 1996, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One of Us (Yes, Prime Minister), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morris Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Who Framed Roger Rabbit 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Who Framed Roger Rabbit 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Framed Roger Rabbit 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Maintenance collaboration of the week

Hello! I'm interested in reviving the Wikipedia:Maintenance collaboration of the week and noticed that you're a member of the Uncategorized Task Force, which does similar tasks. Would you be interested in helping to restart the Maintenance collaboration of the week up again? Chickadee46 (talk|contribs) 02:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, EmanWilm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EmanWilm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solar power in North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_7V836cDusu9OPrf&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Osaka Dry

The article Osaka Dry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a particularly notable cocktail. I see lots of entries in cocktail recipe books, but nothing that discusses the cocktail in any depth - history, commentary, etc. We are not a recipe guide; this content is possibly suitable for WikiBooks but not Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EmanWilm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Yōsei Teikoku albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Yōsei Teikoku albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of power stations in Illinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WSIL. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Templates with red links

It has been a decade since a new dataset was provided at Wikipedia:Templates with red links. It is clearly time for a new one, but I have no insight on who can or will provide this (I asked at WP:VPT some time ago, but the request went unanswered). Do you have any insight on how to proceed with this? BD2412 T 18:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

   The old list was compiled by another user (TopBanana, I think) I'be been unable to find out how the original list was compiled. I was under the impression that it used RussBot. But, after looking at its functionality, that does not seem correct. So, I started looking into how to compile one from scratch. It seems as though I can use AutoWikiBrowser to compile a list of redlinks on a page (if I'm reading its description correctly). I do not know if it has expanded functionality for searching the entire database, and delivering a useable list. I have applied for approval to use the bot and am now waiting on approval. If it works the way I hope, I have a CPU I can dedicate to run the bot. I think I remember the previous user saying it took several days, but with Wikipedia expanding, and tech advancing for 10 years, who knows? I'll let you know what I find out as soon as I'm approved.EmanWilm (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1968 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1968, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1970 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1970, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1972 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1972. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1968

Hello, EmanWilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1968, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1970

Hello, EmanWilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1970, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1972

Hello, EmanWilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1972, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1968

Hello, EmanWilm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1968".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1970

Hello, EmanWilm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1970".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1972

Hello, EmanWilm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "French Syndicate of Cinema Critics Awards 1972".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ham II (talk) 07:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pulling a stroke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pulling a stroke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulling a stroke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Bkell (talk) 15:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]