User talk:Elis59

Elis59, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Elis59! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Udit Narayan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. The topic of Udit Narayan's nationality has been extensively discussed on the article's talk page - please go through those discussions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 15:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced and unconfirmed materials

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you engage in subtle vandalism on Wikipedia. Stop trying to change information (like numbers and dates) without explanation.

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gautama Buddha. JimRenge (talk) 15:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gautama Buddha. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:28, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing: Final Warning

Please desist in your disruptive editing. In particular this edit is completely unacceptable. Any further disruptive behavior will result in your being blocked. No further warnings on this subject will be forthcoming. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.

This is the only warning you will receive for using inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language. Using this kind of content outside of a purely encyclopedic context is considered vandalism. Please review this policy before posting again. If you use inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language on Wikipedia in violation of this policy again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.