User talk:Eigilvesti

A tag has been placed on Antebellum Gallery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. W.marsh 15:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Fetish art. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- Donald Albury 14:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:100 1893.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:100 1893.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 01:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:100 1894.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:100 1894.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 01:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:100 1895.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:100 1895.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 01:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Best-of-l-a-people-2011-the-photographs.6343414.87.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Best-of-l-a-people-2011-the-photographs.6343414.87.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Antebellum (disambiguation) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Antebellum (disambiguation) was changed by Eigilvesti (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978996 on 2013-10-15T05:57:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Antebellum (disambiguation)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 06:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Marianna251. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mineshaft (gay club)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marianna251TALK 18:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Mineshaft (gay club). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Marianna251TALK 18:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Castro's article

Please consider using one of the citation formats available from the top of the editing page, as explained in Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources. Bare urls, which you have been using for references, are subject to link rot, and are harder to recover if any changes occur in the url in the future. Also, please stop adding the link to Nardulistudio, as it does not have any information about Rick Castro. Also, per Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided, please do not link to blogs, as you did to Tom of Finland's blog, as blogs are generally regarded as unreliable. Thank you. - Donald Albury 20:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Rick Castro. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donald Albury 16:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Eigilvesti. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Rick Castro, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Donald Albury 17:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Rick Castro. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donald Albury 13:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BLP noticeboard

I have opened a discussion that involves you at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. You are welcome to comment there. - Donald Albury 14:13, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

I have reverted your edits to Rick Castro beacuse Wikipedia is not a reliable source. You have been warned before about your editing of the article. If you continue to add unreliable sources to the article, you could be blocked from editing. ` Donald Albury 01:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

then how am I supposed to add or correct info? what you're saying is your own source is not a reliable source? everything I'm posting is factual and accurate~ 2603:8000:D101:6225:E4F6:EB78:7664:7844 (talk) 03:12, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also used an interview from anotherman and you've also removed- so I truly don't understand whats acceptable 2603:8000:D101:6225:E4F6:EB78:7664:7844 (talk) 03:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can add the interview back in. Do not cite Wikipedia as a source. Wikipedia is user-generated, and therefore not a reliable source, as is stated in this section of the content guideline I linked above. You can re-use a reliable source that is used in another Wikipedia article, but use of a source found in another Wikipedia article does not guarantee that it is reliable, or suitable for use in the article you are editing. Donald Albury 12:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for clarifying Eigilvesti (talk) 13:37, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Castro

Please stop inserting claims that are not supported by the cited source, as you have just done in Rick Castro. All content in Wikipedia most be supported by reliable sources, and any material that is not supported by cited sources may be challenged and removed until a reliable source is provided. Donald Albury 15:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand I did provide sources for all added content? they are all verified and factual Eigilvesti (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please point out to me where this source supports the statements, "This was the first queer themed exhibition presented at Hollywood Forever", and that the exhibition "is an ongoing unique museum". If there are other reliable sources that do support those statements, please provide a link to them Donald Albury 15:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.instagram.com/p/C3EzxYKri00/

https://www.kcrw.com/news/shows/greater-la/dia-de-los-muertos/rick-castro 2602:306:CCF2:87F9:A482:C041:2D3E:B580 (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instagram is not a reliable source as defined by Wikipedia. The KCRW piece is cited for the first sentence in the paragraph, but I do not see any mention in that source of This was the first queer themed exhibition presented at Hollywood Forever or that the exhibition is an ongoing unique museum. It states that the exhibit was closing at the end of November. The KCRW piece does state that Castro had purchased a niche in the columbarium, but says nothing about any continuation of the exhibit. The source presented for that is the Hollywood Forever website, and that says nothing about the duration of the "Columbarium Continuum" exhibit, and nothing about it being a "unique museum". Donald Albury 17:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The KCRW- piece states-

"Photographer Rick Castro brings queer sensibility to Hollywood Forever" That exhibited ended on November 30th.

The official instagram for Hollywood Forever Cemetery where we are announcing it is now continuing as a permanent unique museum called Columbarium Continuum by Rick Castro. The only reason this info is not included in the Hollywood Forever webpage is limited space. Please understand it behooves me to post acurate information for my presentations. there would be no reason for me to post false information. I have worked as an art photographer for 30 years. Social media is how I promote my events. thank you for understanding- Rick Castro 2602:306:CCF2:8B09:7153:B876:B87B:C7A3 (talk) 00:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rick Castro have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Donald Albury 12:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Donald- I am Rick Castro~ adding pertinent information to my wiki page. I've included posted sources as per wiki's requirements. how is adding to my continuous history of my art considered not constructive? I've spent considerable time oocumenting my recent tour. please restore. Eigilvesti (talk) 13:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the policy at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Please also read the guideline at Wikipedia:Reliable sources, which explains which kinds of sources are acceptable as support for content in Wikipedia articles. I notified the Conflict of Interest noticeboard. Donald Albury 15:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Donald. I always follow the guidelines. Everything is true, factual and verifiable. the sources are published stories, events and interviews from known publications. Each entry has one verifiable source. I could include more if you wish. The idea that you're over policing me and requesting blocking me comes off as prejudicial. BTW- numerous people have contributed to this page. This is my life work thus far. Eigilvesti (talk) 15:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I always follow the guidelines" Great. Please can you indicate where you made the CoI declaration that our guidelines require? I note that you were advised of this, in a post on this page dated 25 January 2020. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]