User talk:Edwardadoyle

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyckr (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyckr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyckr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Edwardadoyle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyckr (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyckr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyckr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyckr (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyckr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyckr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyckr has been accepted

Kyckr, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 15:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Paid editing

Hello Edward. Thank you for disclosing on your user page that you are a director at Kycr. I have added a notice to the talk page of the Kycr article linking to your disclosure, as required by the Wikipedia's paid editing disclosure policy which you have accepted as part of Wikipedia's terms of use. Please now familiarise yourself with the rules on paid editing. You can make very limited edits on the article yourself but for all other changes you must make edit requests instead. Please reply to me here to confirm that you've read and understood these policies. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

 Warning @Edwardadoyle: please do reply to my message having read and understood the rules here. If you do not, and you continue to edit the Kyckr article, you are likely to be blocked from editing. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of company registers. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 09:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

These were factual corrections as already pointed out.

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to European Business Register. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

These were factual corrections as already pointed out.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Cronin, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 17:11, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

This was done at the explicit request of the person himself who is known to me.

May 2018

As per all previous edits. All links provided were 100% factual to official government or government agency websites, sources more trusworthy than wikipedia. Please discontinue your trolling, and can i remind you that the law of defamation still applies.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

I continue to provide periodic factual updates from official government and government agency sources.

No legal threats

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm afraid you must withdraw what is perceived as a violation as you may be blocked from editing for making such a threat. Wikipedia editors must follow the dispute resolution processes rather making legal threats.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

No threat has been made made. I merely commented that some of the postings on this page were not factual, and borderline defamatory. There was no need for such statements. I think people should be factual in their statements, that respect and approach should apply equally to contributor and editor.

Saying "i remind you that the law of defamation still applies" seems like a legal threat to me. I would second what Dlohcierekim states and ask you to unequivocally state that you will not pursue legal action; please review WP:NLT for more appropriate ways to address concerns about improper information. 331dot (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello Edwardadoyle. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Edwardadoyle. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Edwardadoyle|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I do understand the nature of these comments and I am closely connected with the company per my disclosure to that effect. That said all comments are factual and reference 3rd party information from reliable official or reputable sources. I am happy to leave as is from this point, on the understanding that the COI flag can be removed.

This is not a negotiation. You have not complied with WP:PAID. You do have a WP:COI, and there is no reason to remove the "coi" tag unless the discussion at WP:COIN determines otherwise. You will cease from editing, removing tags, or any other editing until you address WP:PAID and respond to the WP:ANI thread.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Please make sure your disclosure fully complies with the requirements. While you don't have to use the template, you do have fully comply with the TOU requirements in what you disclose. Nil Einne (talk) 11:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

You appear to be editing anonymously. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in both your account and IP address being blocked from editing. Additionally, making these edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)