User talk:EdmHopLover1995/Archive 2

Draftification of old articles

Hey! WP:DRAFTIFY states not to draftify any articles older than 90 days old without consensus (see 2d; this was discussed at VPP, so it's solid policy). I'm not sure whether that's a hard cutoff or not, but you recently draftified Juan de Valladolid, which was over 18 years old – definitely too old to be draftifying it. If you want to proceed, you should take the article to AFD, and suggest draftification in your nomination. Cheers! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just came here to say the same thing (thanks for catching this, Skarmory). Draftification is for recently created articles by inexperienced editors. Long-standing articles should either be improved, be tagged, identifying problems, or you can pursue one of Wikipedia's deletion processes.

If you have questions about this, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. My apologies for the mistake. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 00:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I will search for sources instead to improve. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 00:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, it was appropriate to draftify Draft:Splits of the Roman Empire. It's best to use User:Evad37/MoveToDraft as this script will post a message to the page creator, alerting them that the page has been moved to Draft space. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is now at AFD after someone else draftified it; feel free to chip in as you see fit. I proposed draftification as that is possible through AFD. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Webster article

Any reason to draft an article about actor from Mayor of Kingstown and with over 100 credits? There are sources specifically saying that he is a veteran actor and describing his roles. What sources are else needed? How many more paragraphs should be added for it to be ready? Actor meets NACTOR - numerous significant roles, this is demonstrated in article. I am a bit tired about Wikipedia bureaucracy by now. Kirill C1 (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pind Dadan Khan Shuttle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pind Dadan Khan Shuttle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qcne (talk) 13:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pind Dadan Khan Shuttle

Hello. You moved this article to draft only 4 minutes after its creation. Please slow down, thanks. 2A00:23EE:1560:20CD:709A:4DFF:FEF8:160C (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider switching to the new MoveToDraft script

Hi, please consider switching to the new Move To Draft script. It is fork of the script that you are using, but has some bug fixes, important warnings, and some feature enhancements. Happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]