User talk:EdgarAllanToe
Welcome
[edit]Hey there, EdgarAllanToe. Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian and decide to stay! Here are a few good links for newcomers (or "oldcomers" for reference):
By the way, you should sign and date your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Three tildes (~~~) produces just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
Great, just what we need around this place... more Romantic Toets. :) Cheers. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 19:47, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]I'm looking around and around for nice big pics and you put them all in that so-called "info-boxes" - and make them small. I've have seen that some people want that info-box shit, and i agree - but only if no information disappears and only when the pics remain as big as i have put them in. Greetings MutterErde 21:05, 8 September 2005 (UTC) btw. if you have problems with that template then take the other one like in India Allen.
Thanks for your message
[edit]I'm flattered by your message. However, if I wanted to put more about myself on my user page, I would. Taxwoman 22:30, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
No - not offended at all :-) Taxwoman 08:41, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
Licensing
[edit]I avoided uploading images for quite a while for the same reason. Now that I understand a bit about it, I find that it is easy to do and enhanced the article. Wikipeida believes that DVD and video covers are all fair use, so there will be no problems adding them in:
- Find a DVD or video cover that features the relevant person,
- save it to your computer,
- click "upload file" in the list to the left,
- browse for the file name that you have saved it under,
- choose "DVD cover" or "Video cover" from the drop-down menu that is provided,
- click on some button to begin upload. This is will take some seconds, but not long.
- Add the following into the article: [[Image:filename.jpg|right|frame|Any text you want to add, e.g., Leonardo di Caprio in ''Titanic'']] where filename is the name of the file that you saved.
Enjoy, Zeromacnoo 16:01, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- i don't think my pic on aika miura was false.. could you check it out!! btw.. i found aika on rei here http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeabundo/187102037/ (give link don't cause a pain) --Landavia 07:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Info on image, please
[edit]Please go to Image:HannahHarperBlueTop.jpg and edit that image description page to give the source (URL, if online; ISBN, if scanned from a book; and if you've taken the image yourself, just say so) and the licensing status (the list of image copyright tags might be useful) of this image. All our images should have this information. Thank you. Lupo 11:31, 26 September 2005 (UTC) (If no source is supplied, the image will be deleted.)
- BTW, if you claim "fair use" you should provide a detailed fair use rationale addressing the four points of fair use. Lupo 11:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Notability and porn
[edit]Hiya Just to make this 100% clear, I do believe that notable porn actors should be listed on wikipedia. However (as with Africa (porn star)) some of the listings leave so much to be desired that they're simply a pointless strain on the servers and give the category a bad name. Now, I really am not much into porn, and sometimes I won't spot a famous name if her article is badly written (as seems to have happened with Careena Collins). Would you be interested in collaborating with me on a clean-up? I'm going through all the actress listings (slowly) - what I could do is send you the names of the articles that look completely unnotable/vanity/advertising etc and you could let me know which of them should be saved. It'd be really great to be able to use your expertise. Cheers, Vizjim 11:15, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
Noticed you were the creator of the article. Wanted to notify you that it had been nominated for AfD. Horrorshowj 17:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Teresa May
[edit]I have nominated Teresa May, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa May. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - JulesN Talk 23:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of Angelica Sin for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angelica Sin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Sin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Devon Michaels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, only nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. Negligible reliably sourced biographical content.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Ava Devine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No nonscene awards, just nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. Little reliably sourced biographical content.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Dasha (actress) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dasha (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dasha (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 08:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Ava Devine for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ava Devine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Devine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 20:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Gia Paloma for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gia Paloma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gia Paloma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Teresa May (actress)
[edit]The article Teresa May (actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I am not convinced this article meets the guidelines for biographies.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wiki-Coffee Talk 06:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Teresa May (actress) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teresa May (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa May (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wiki-Coffee Talk 06:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Teresa May (actress)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Teresa May (actress), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wiki-Coffee Talk 06:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Rita Faltoyano for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rita Faltoyano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita Faltoyano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 18:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Nina Mercedez for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nina Mercedez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Mercedez (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Nikki Dial for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Dial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Dial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Missvain (talk) 04:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Taylor Hayes (actress) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Hayes (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Spartaz Humbug! 09:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Poppy Morgan for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poppy Morgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.