User talk:Lord Voldemort

Archives: please see:

Oldest — contains my favorite exchange so far. Although, it could easily be this instead.
A little less old — contains SaltyPig's problem with Ann Coulter
A fair amount less old — contains the discussion surrounding my RfA from my talk page only.

Quite a bit less old — contains a yummy cookie. (Getting quite large. The archive, not the cookie.)
Basically not old at all
Truly not old at all
Future discussions?

Łóŗď Vòļđèmøřť

A much better spoiler template, IMHO:

Spoiler warning: Plot and/or ending details follow.

Just something to keep in mind. ∴--Lord Voldemort ^{(Dark Mark)} 20:17, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I appreciate this. I certainly have nothing against you personally or the idea of you being resysopped, but we've had several cases of "old crowd" admins returning after long periods of inactivity and being out-of-touch with what our policies and guidelines have become over the years. This is ultimately bad for the site (drama, disruption, often an ArbCom case) and for the returning admin (being dragged to ANI or ArbCom, sometimes even desysopped). I'd love to see you return to activity, including administrative activity once you've had a chance to re-acclimate yourself to the project. Many things have changed even since my join date (2015). If you need any help getting back up to speed, feel free to message me. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. You and Bbb23 made valid points, and I thought about it and reconsidered. Thanks. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 18:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lord Voldemort. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

--[[User:Lord Voldemort|<font color="purple">LV</font>]] <sup><font color="#3D9140">[[User talk:Lord Voldemort|(Dark Mark)]]</font></sup>

: --LV ^{(Dark Mark)}

to

--[[User:Lord Voldemort|<span style="color: purple;">LV</span>]] <sup><span style="color: #3D9140;">[[User talk:Lord Voldemort|(Dark Mark)]]</span></sup>

: --LV ^{(Dark Mark)}

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hufflepuff > Slytherin

Eh, why y'all slytherins gotta be so hypocritical? you're a half blood yourself! 2605:A000:EB47:F100:5D3D:8369:2E42:6BD7 (talk) 21:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bad hat harry listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad hat harry. Since you had some involvement with the Bad hat harry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]