User talk:Edenc1/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Orphaned non-free image File:LogoIsrael10.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LogoIsrael10.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Josh Bowman

I've reverted your Twinkle readdition of material to "Josh Bowman". Generally when two editors say in the edit summary content is removed due to BLP concerns and point to a discussion at the BLP noticeboard, it shouldn't be restored without comment. Please feel free to join the discussion at the noticeboard. Thanks. --92.6.200.56 (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Doh!

I'm not sure how I managed to miss the entire sourced section explaining his background?! Thanks for catching my error. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 16:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Hello dear it's funny we were editing Zach's profile at the same time. Thanks for your contribs I like him too. I noticed you erased my twitter link. I know it is not veriied but I asure you it is his according to the Guys with kids twitter check it out of you want. I added it because this will give Zach more followers. Also Trevor's is really his twitter account they've said they are lazy and that's why they don't verify their accounts I think that's quite the case and also maybe thay have but haven't got it yet remember it is kind of difficult to get your verified check this days hopefully soon he will but I kind of doubt it, I don't think they care about that sort of thing. Anyway just wanted to say hi to a fellow Zach's fan. And hope you like the new picture I added I think he looks great, don't you? I don't know what I clicked on that I disabled my comments page so you could reply but I'm sure you agree on giving Zach the chance to get even more popular. And thanks again for caring! Ill stay watchful to add new stuff to his profile hope he'll give more interviews.Take care. All the best, bye. :) Frog890 (talk) 08:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Can you help me please.

Hi dear how are you. If you can please comment for keeping my picture here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Trevor_Moore_on_The_Trevor_Moore_Show.png#Answer_and_request_to_let_my_files_be --FR9 22:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.B.Davis2003 (talk) 22:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

"...within a 24-hour period".

1st revert: 18:57, 9 September 2012

2nd revert: 21:08, 11 September 2012. Edenc1 • Talk 22:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Hola!

I did that for fun, and I was planning on deleting that soon after my friends saw it. :--)

(But thanks for saving me the time though. Haha~)

Otterbatch (talk) 14:39, 27 September 2012 (UTC)