User talk:Edenc1/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Orphaned non-free media (File:HOT3 Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:HOT3 Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:HaShir Shelanu 4.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HaShir Shelanu 4.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Karen_McCluskey.jpg

I have tagged File:Karen_McCluskey.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Van de Kamp

This edit is not what the source says. That is why I have reverted it. Flyer22 (talk) 17:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Furthermore, "One More Kiss" happened in 2006, not 2005. Flyer22 (talk) 18:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Oops. In "One More Kiss" we can actually see the kiss, so I thought the article talks about that one... Edenc1 • Talk 18:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem. You aren't the only who thought that, unless you were also one of those two IPs who changed it as well. Though maybe it was the same IP.

Anyway, I tweaked that part of the Critical reception section to help clear up confusion. The last resort would be to specify "...when Andrew kissed character Justin in the pool...," LOL. And I guess the gay groups mean that the kiss could be seen underwater and somewhat in the shadows, even though the audience was unsure of who the two people were until they came to the surface. Flyer22 (talk) 18:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't like Replace This Image pictures.

The reason why I removed the Replace This Image picture from the Nicollette Sheridan page is because I don't like Replace This Image pictures. They bore me. AdamDeanHall (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hot3Logo.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Hot3Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

201.220.92.91 aka Nikollita

Hello, I just wanted to inform you that I have reported both users for edit warring. Thanks a lot. (Jamesbeat (talk) 21:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC))

Hi

Most of the sources of what you sent me have it as "the Knesset Channel" or "Knesset Channel" (note the lower case t and unless at the beginning of a sentence). Most of the soucres from very RS have it the same on [Google News http://news.google.ca/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=ca&hl=en&q=%22Knesset+Channel%22&cf=all]. Generally on Wikipedia articles do not include the definite article (i.e., Netherlands) in the article name unless they do themselves, but the I can't see where the soucres do. - Epson291 (talk) 18:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Thinking it further I think it's analogous to it actually being HaKnesset he:הכנסת in Hebrew but just Knesset in English, but with the article starting off and referring it to as "the Knesset" since it is definite. But this is just my opinion without RS one way or the other. - Epson291 (talk) 19:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

It seems that you're right :-) Edenc1 • Talk 21:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Adam Lambert straw poll on including/removing "Order #" and "Results" columns from the performances section

Hi, this may seem rather trivial but I'm trying to gauge community consensus on including or removing "Order #" and "Results" columns from the performances section on the Adam Lambert article which you have been in some way recently involved. The poll is here. Your time is appreciated. -- Banjeboi 21:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)