User talk:Edasf

Welcome!

Hi Edasf! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Toddy1. Wikipedia has a concept of verifiability, not truth. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Economy of India, but you didn't provide a citation to a reliable source. The existing number was supported by the citation next to it. Your edit has been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation to a reliable source that supports your number, then you can and re-add it. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you want to discuss it, you can leave a message on Talk:Economy of India. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hey I have restored it and added source as well so I am remove this warning message. Edasf (talk) 04:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Fylindfotberserk its agreed per consensus that Hindu synthesis began around 2nd Century BC the before in existence was Brahmanism.See Historical Vedic religion.I have always reverted vandal edits please don't call anyone disruptive on your presumptions. Edasf (talk) 10:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are disruptive since you clearly changed the sourced content. If necessary seek consensus in the article talk page per WP:BRD instead of resorting to edit wars. Also the section itself maintains that Pre-Nanda era followed Brahmanism, as well as Mauryas reintroduced it after the Nandas were removed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See my linked page calling Brahmanism as Hinduism isnt correct. Edasf (talk) 11:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Expedition of Chenab by Alexander the Great and Porous, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix your signature

Your signature has unbalanced markup. Please fix it so that there is bold and italic markup at the end, along with a closing span tag, as shown in this edit. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sino-Kannauj war

Hello @Edasf, this is regarding the new article you just created. I think the article would pass general notability guidelines. However, the name "Sino-Kannauj war" doesn't appear in any scholarly sources and thus you should rename it. PadFoot (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PadFoot2008 Well, I used this name since other names like Wang Xuance-Kannauj war would make title lengthy and inappropriate per WP:CONCISE and WP:PRECISE.You can suggest a new title. Edasf (talk) 16:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Edasf, I'm not finding a short name for it unfortunately. "Sino-Kannauj war" would be WP:OR, so a descriptive title like "War between Wang Xuance and Arunasva" would need to do. PadFoot (talk) 16:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PadFoot2008 Done Edasf (talk) 16:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Edasf, I believe that Arunasva should be mentioned here to be specific, and "invasion of India" sounds too big of an event if all he did was march to a city in the Doab (compared to a large-scale campaign for conquest). I think perhaps "Conflict between Wang Xuance and Arunasva" or "War between Wang Xuance and Arunasva" would be good here. PadFoot (talk) 16:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PadFoot2008 Done. Edasf (talk) 16:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Map has wild error"

the map I have added is based on the "source" mentioned in the article or map's caption itself

The current maximum extent map isn't even following the sources they have cited, please see for yourself. JingJongPascal (talk) 15:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That map vanished Mauryas from south incorrectly included Aria as Mauryan (I gave all this on Article's tp) Edasf (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? I don't understand the first line

And about Aria, it was ceded to Mauryas after Mauryan-Selucid War, check again. JingJongPascal (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your map has vanished Mauryas from South India check my source on articles tp. Edasf (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, what do you mean by vanished Mauryas from south India? JingJongPascal (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your rfc

You should edit and provide all points into your rfc. And all my points too

I don't recommend even opening a rfc tho JingJongPascal (talk) 07:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JingJongPascal Perhaps why? Edasf (talk) 07:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Edasf and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhagalpur Museum has been accepted

Bhagalpur Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dcotos (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reshma Aur Sultaan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reshma Aur Sultaan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reshma Aur Sultaan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. PadFoot (talk) 11:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]