User talk:Ecoboy90

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ecoboy90! Thank you for your contributions. I am I dream of horses and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 23:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cornwall flag

Template:Infobox English county makes no provision for a caption to be provided for the flag image... so, if that is what you are trying to do, I suggest you stop.... And, PS, it would probably help if you started to use the "Show preview" button to show your edits before you save them. Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bastian Schweinsteiger, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:35, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at European Cup and UEFA Champions League records and statistics. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Qed237 (talk) 11:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Alexandria. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Elizium23 (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conversion of non-Muslim places of worship into mosques, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trebizond and Eregli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of José Gomes (footballer born 1999)

The article José Gomes (footballer born 1999) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and fails WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SLBedit (talk) 04:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of José Gomes (footballer born 1999) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Gomes (footballer born 1999) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Gomes (footballer born 1999) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shams (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuwaiti. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Qed237 (talk) 21:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Muhammad, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dhrm77 (talk) 13:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Qarqar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Que. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League top scorers. Qed237 (talk) 10:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Til Barsip

What was the motivation for moving Til Barsip to Tell Barsip? As far as I know, this is spelled Til Barsip pretty consistently in the literature. Thanks in advance, Q·L·1968 ☿ 16:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aelia Capitolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Bank. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Oudna ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Feinoha ^Talk 17:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I think I see what you were trying to do with this edit after you did your next edit. In the future, please use edit summaries to avoid needless confusion. Feinoha ^Talk 19:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

~~There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Feinoha ^Talk 17:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Withdrawn. Feinoha ^Talk 19:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Valeria, Spain (Roman City), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuenca. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Era style changes

Please follow WP:ERA - and in any case, when you are making such changes you should add an edit summary. The need for edit summaries is mentioned above by another editor. Doug Weller talk 18:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Grand Mosque in Sana'a.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Grand Mosque in Sana'a.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Karab El Bayin

added a link pointing to El

Karab El Watar

added a link pointing to El

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Karab El Watar

I can't read Arabic or copy the text to a translator, so I can't tell if it makes that claim specifically or if you are interpreting it. What I can say is that I can find no other sources for it, the other 4 Wikipedia articles don't mention it,, and that if only one person has suggested it it might not be significant enough to use, see WP:UNDUE. What would help is if you posted in English text from the book where Jawat Ali makes that identification .15:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs)

Your email

Please don't email me, I prefer my discussions to be transparent - open to anyone to see them, unless there are privacy issues. I didn't notify you about the name change because you don't reply to people, at least there are no replies on this talk page and it doesn't seem that you use talk pages either. Please read WP:COMMONNAME, I simply changed it to the spelling I could find most commonly used in sources meeting WP:RS, leaving a redirect so that people who searched on your spelling would find it. I'll post on the article talk page now and expect you to respond there. Doug Weller talk 18:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't mark edits as minor unless they are formatting, spelling, etc. Doug Weller talk 18:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And again, I won't discuss by email. By the way, even if you create an article, it isn't your article. I've explained on one talk page and several WP:Edit summaries. Doug Weller talk 13:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

Talk:Karab El Watar#Requested move 28 May 2016. Doug Weller talk 13:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited El Sharih Yahdhib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dhamar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wahab El Yahiz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wahab El Yahiz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wahab El Yahiz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 20:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 21:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Wahab El Yahiz, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ecoboy90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it is totally unfair to be banned for indefinite period of time, what happened is that I created many pages but some admins didn't agree the spellings, so why am I the one who is blocked for defending his original proposed spelling !!!

Decline reason:

You're not blocked for any of that. You're blocked for the Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. You'll need to address this if you wish to be unblocked. —DoRD (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ecoboy90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK fine ... I was a little bit abusive with some users but they provoke me first by moving my pages that I have created without discussing and by accusing me of misspelling my new articles which are not offending anyone as they are about ancient kingdoms. If you don't mind I want my account back, indefinite blocking is not fair !

Decline reason:

You were blocked for misusing multiple accounts. This request does not address the reason for the block. HighInBC 23:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ecoboy90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Come on, you know that is not true. I barely used my second account, the first reason that you mentioned is completely different from the second reason, do you want me to give up ?! Indefinite blocking can't be justified because I have two accounts !

Decline reason:

On the contrary, blocking indefinitely can be justified for misuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 00:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A couple of statistics. Your puppet made 137 edits, and you and your puppet edited the same nine pages.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23, PhilKnight: You know that I am not here for money or fame !!! so why do I need to make virtual trouble with people whom I don't even know ?! this is the first time I hear about socks, puppets anf if I log in using another account that would be considered a fatal mistake in which I should be banned for it. Don't be subjective, indefinite blocking is not fair at all !! Ecoboy90 (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ecoboy90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Come on, You know that I am not here for money or fame !!! so why do I need to make virtual trouble with people whom I don't even know ?! this is the first time I hear about socks, puppets anf if I log in using another account that would be considered a fatal mistake in which I should be banned for it. Don't be subjective, indefinite blocking is not fair at all !!

Decline reason:

You've admitted to sockpuppeting and you've provided no reason to lift your block. Please think very, very carefully before just spamming yet another unblock request. Your next one is likely to be the last one before your talk page access is revoked. You need to address the reason for your block and convince us you understand Wikipedia policy and won't commit the same abuses again. Yamla (talk) 12:19, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I am not going to convince anybody to anything !! this block has been made because of the first reason which is abusing admins, so you don't need to invent a false theory about socks and puppets! Do you need people to beg to do some edits in a virtual environment !! why wikipedia has let people to edit in the first place if "some admins" won't agree simple edits about spellings, by the way I created the pages !! All your reasons are simply made up and I really think that wikipedia is led by some tyrants and gangs. Therefore, people who heard about many stories of ridiculous blocking are not considering this encyclopedia a reliable source anymore, because of its subjective admins !!! Ecoboy90 (talk) 12:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish. Talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ecoboy90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Grand Mosque in Sana'a.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Grand Mosque in Sana'a.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Batman Arena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Batman Arena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batman Arena until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 17:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]