User talk:Eassin

Don't know where to put this, but according to the QI Annual Book E, your name means lust for bulls and cannot be successfully googld. It cliams this is the only result.

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Eassin! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Kukini Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Kukini 04:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

List of social networking websites

Awesome piece of formatting! You've improved the look no end. Congratulations. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat) 15:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I replied to your question on my talk page. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On 17 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article permutohedron, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 00:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

zircon merge

Please don't merge articles without consensus or discussion. The only comment on Talk:Zircon was an oppose. I have reverted your merge. Vsmith 17:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Two million

Looks like you did it. Congratulations! Durova^Charge! 08:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, congrats!--65.95.96.153 15:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Any thoughts on this?

I raised this issue on the talk page of El Hormiguero, just wondered if you had any thoughts on the question of who should be credited with creating the article. DustyPeg1945 10:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Erlangen Program

Hello Eassin! I'm glad to see somebody working on this article. If you know this material, is there any chance you'd be able to find references as well? The new stuff added over the past year generally has been unreferenced to Klein's work. My guess is that most people who know enough math to contribute here have learned the Erlangen material from other textbooks. In that case, mentioning the textbook used would be helpful to our readers, and the references to Klein might be figured out later. EdJohnston 17:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Help desk

I responded to your question on the Help Desk here Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 20:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Quite Interesting

You are mentioned on the very last page of a book called "The QI Annual". It dictates that "eassin" is actually a word, so rare, it can't be googled, only found as a name for a contributer for Wikipedia (ie. you). --86.151.99.217 (talk) 17:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Timeline of environmental history

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Timeline of environmental history, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Timeline of environmental events. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Alternative definition of derivative

In the article "Non-Newtonian calculus", the section now called "Alternative definition of derivative" is not appropriate, because most readers are not familiar with that approach to the derivative concept, and so it complicates matters by trying to do too many things at the same time. I do think that "Alternative definition of derivative" would be appropriate for a new Wikipedia article. Smithpith (talk) 20:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolf minimum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Wolf minimum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ï¿½ (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Eigenvector centrality and PageRank

From the edit history of the subsection Eigenvector Centrality, it seems that you are the one who edited the sentence "Google's PageRank is a variant of the Eigenvector centrality measure" into the article. Would you care to explain this claim? For eigenvector centrality, we want to find the Perron vector of a $\{0,1\}$ adjacency matrix. For PageRank, we want to find the Perron vector of a column stochastic matrix. Now a $\{0,1\}$ adjacency matrix is a column stochastic matrix if and only if it is a permutation matrix. So, apart from this trivial case (where the Perron vector is the all-one vector and everyone has equal ranking/centrality), the two problems are fundamentally different and we cannot cast one into another. So, in what sense is PageRank a variant of eigenvector centrality?The suffocated (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eassin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Eassin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Electrical analogies

I see that you have put a lot of electrical theorems and models into category:electrical analogies. I don't think that this is really right. Theorems and models are not analogies. SpinningSpark 23:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

To make that a bit clearer, one can form a mechanical network by analogy with an electrical network. Tellegen's theorem can then be applied to the analogously formed mechanical network. That does not make Tellegen's theorem itself an analogy as your categorisation would have it. It is a theorem being applied to an analogy. In the same way, Kirchhoff's laws and Ohm's law can be applied to it, and I'm sure you will agree that they are not analogies. SpinningSpark 07:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

I see that you have been editing yesterday since I made this comment. Since you have chosen not to reply and explain your thinking, I'm going to revert the Tellegen's theorem change and any others I come across. SpinningSpark 14:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

I thought electrical analogies meant a broad generalization of electrical engineering applying lumped element models and network analysis to anything that meets certain criteria, such as Tellegen's theorem. It sounds like you want electrical analogies to mean just parallels to elements in the models, not the parallels in modelling? How about we work on improving both the electrical analogy articles and the modelling articles? Eassin (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

It can mean that, or it can mean an analogy (such as the hydraulic analogy) developed to help teach electrical engineeering. I don't disagree with you understanding of analogies, but I don't see how the generalisation you are making justifies the categorisation. Just because Tellegen's theorem is obeyed by both the analogous systems, does not make Tellegen itself the analogy. Another example is the inverse square law. One can form an analogy between gravity and opical illuminance which both obey this law for point sources. So does electrical flux density. So does magnetic field strength. But I don't think that means we should put the inverse square law in the categories gravitational analogies, optical analogies, electrical analogies, magnetic analogies etc etc etc. Almost every law in any field of physics will have analogies in every other field. It would be just silly to start identifying all these laws as being analogies of multiple fields. In Wikipedia terms, we should categorise articles as electrical analogies only if the article identifies itself as being an electrical analogy. SpinningSpark 16:08, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Resistance-Reluctance Model (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Resistance-Reluctance Model may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Eassin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Resistance-Reluctance Model

Hello, Eassin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Resistance-Reluctance Model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)