User talk:Smithpith
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Calculus do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. silly rabbit (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Non-Newtonian Calculus
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Non-Newtonian Calculus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epbr123 (talk) 23:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Non-Newtonian Calculus
[edit]A tag has been placed on Non-Newtonian Calculus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheMile (talk) 00:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Non-Newtonian calculus
[edit] If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Ozob (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I am particularly concerned that the only activity you engage in is the addition of links and references to Non-Newtonian calculus. I can tell that this is an important subject to you, but there are many other topics on Wikipedia that need expert help. I'd like it if you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics and started editing with us. Please consider helping us instead of working alone! Ozob (talk) 21:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Calculus. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 23:21, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Request re article entitled "Non-Newtonian Calculus"
[edit]Hello!
Please consider the following article for inclusion in Wikipedia. The article is pertinent and unbiased. And it violates no copyright. You may e-mail me at smithpith@yahoo.com. Thank you.
Sincerely, Michael Grossman Smithpith (talk) 18:54, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
NON-NEWTONIAN CALCULUS
Brief Description:
The classical calculus, developed in the seventeenth century by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, is a linear calculus in the following sense: its operators are additive and homogeneous, and the linear functions are the functions having a constant derivative. The non-Newtonian calculi, created in the twentieth century, provide nonlinear alternatives to the classical calculus.
In the geometric calculus, which was the first non-Newtonian calculus, the operators turn out to be multiplicative. And in that system the exponential functions are the functions having a constant derivative. Furthermore, the geometric average plays a central role in the geometric calculus.
In the bigeometric calculus (another non-Newtonian calculus) the operators are also multiplicative, but the power functions are the functions having a constant derivative. Furthermore the bigeometric derivative turns out to be scale-free, i.e., it is invariant under all changes of scale (or unit) in function arguments and values.
There are infinitely many non-Newtonian calculi. Like the classical calculus, each of them possesses a distinctive method of measuring changes in function arguments; a distinctive method of measuring changes in function values; four operators: a gradient (i.e., an average rate of change), a derivative, a natural average, and an integral; a special class of functions having a constant derivative; a Basic Theorem, involving the gradient, derivative, and natural average; a Basic Problem, whose solution motivates a simple definition of the integral in terms of the natural average; and two Fundamental Theorems which reveal that the derivative and integral are inversely related.
References:
[1] Bashirov, Misirli Kurpinar, and Ozyapici. "Multiplicative calculus and its applications", Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2008.
[2] Grossman and Katz. Non-Newtonian Calculus, ISBN 0912938013, Lee Press, 1972.
[3] Meginniss. "Non-Newtonian calculus applied to probability, utility, and Bayesian analysis", Proceedings of the American Statistical Association: Business and Economics Statistics, 1980.
A tag has been placed on Non-Newtonian calculus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also want to move the page to EverythingWiki. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ozob (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Protest re deletion of the article entitled "Non-Newtonian calculus"
[edit]Hello!
I contest the deletion of "Non-Newtonian calculus" from Wikipedia. The article is pertinent, coherent, meaningful, and unbiased. And it violates no copyright. You may e-mail me at smithpith@yahoo.com. Thank you.
Sincerely, Michael Grossman
AfD nomination of Non-Newtonian calculus
[edit]I have nominated Non-Newtonian calculus, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-Newtonian calculus. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ozob (talk) 00:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]Removal of the {{verify credibility}} tags on your books is considered vandalism. We don't deny they exist, but they all seem to be self-published, so they cannot be used as references except as to assertions as to what you wrote.
Consider this a serious warning. If you continue to insert references to your own books into articles, you may be blocked or banned. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Conflict of interests?
[edit]Hi, I've noticed that you are adding references to your own books in a variety of articles related to averages. There seems to be some consensus that your books are somewhat outside the mainstream of conventional mathematics. You might consider, to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interests in the future posting a request to add the book on the talk page of the article. Sławomir Biały (talk) 03:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Non-Newtonian Calculus
[edit]I have noticed for the last few weeks you are putting links to non-Newtonian calculus all over the place again. I shall raise a note at WT:WPM and see what the general consensus is about it. Dmcq (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
From Michael Grossman: I thought those links were pertinent. If I was wrong, I'm sorry. I have no intention of violating Wikipedia's rules. Smithpith (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Volterra
[edit]If you have any pertinent details about Volterra's multiplicative calculus, it may be helpful to add it there. This may result in the page being salvaged as a historical piece. Tkuvho (talk) 18:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicholas Nevid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1980 Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Multiplicative calculus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Multiplicative calculus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page China Medical University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Smithpith. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Smithpith. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |