User talk:Eagle439

Welcome!

Hello, Eagle439, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Eagle439! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:23, Thursday, February 7, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ruberwa Image.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Ruberwa Image.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Azarias Ruberwa2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Azarias Ruberwa2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Azarias Ruberwa3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Azarias Ruberwa3.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Azarias Ruberwa.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Azarias Ruberwa.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azarias.RM.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Azarias.RM.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Azarias.RM.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll answer the question you posted about "fair use" at User talk:74.96.146.233 to keep everything together. I suggest you stop using the IP account as much as possible and stick to using this account when you edit.

"Fair use" and "non-free content" are similar, but different concepts. "Fair use" (or "fair dealing") are legal concepts that some countries apply to their respective copyright laws, while "non-free content" relates to the use of copyrighted content on Wikipedia only. As explained in WP:NFC#Background, Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is much more restrictive than "fair use" by design, and it's this policy which needs to be complied with every time a non-free file is used on Wikipedia.

This policy is based upon a Wikimedia Foundation resolution and tries to keep non-free use on Wikipedia as minimal as possible, with it only really being allowed for exceptional cases where there are really no reasonable free alternatives to using non-free content. There are ten non-free content use criteria which need to be satisfied each time non-free content is used. One of these in WP:NFCC#1 which states a free equivalent should be used whenever possible and the long-standing consensus has been to not allow any non-free images of living persons to be used as long as it's considered reasonable for a free equivalent to be found or created which can serve the same encyclopedic purposes as non-free photo. A free equivalent doesn't need to currently exist or even be created by the person wanting to upload the non-free image; as long as it's deemed reasonable that someone somwhere can someday create a free equivalent, a non-free image is never going to be allowed. Most well-known public figures can be expected to appear publically somewhere sometime which means that there's always going to be an opportunity for someone to take their photo and then upload it to Wikipedia (or Wikimedia Commons) under a free license. This is basically why a non-free image of Ruberwa is pretty much never going to be allowed.

If you disagree that this file is not "replaceable non-free use", follow the template's instructions and use {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}} to explain why. Add this template to the file's page so that the administrator reviewing the speedy deletion template I added is aware of that you're contesting the deletion. The administrator will then decide if deleting the file is appropriate per relevant Wikipedia policies or guidelines or whether further discussion is needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I am reading through the policy more carefully and will make sure to abide by the non-free content use policy. Do you care if I delete the current picture and put up a picture I think might meet all the requirements? Eagle439 (talk) 20:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

Hello Eagle439. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Azarias Ruberwa, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Eagle439. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Eagle439|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eagle439. I've added the above template based upon you statement you made here where you said you were "the social media manager of Mr. Ruberwa". Please carefully read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and make sure you comply with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines when you edit any content anywhere on Wikipedia about Ruberwa. You should also read Wikipedia:Ownership of content and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site because you might be misunderstanding the purpose of a Wikipedia article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:13, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marchjuly-- I would like to let you know that I deleted the part about me being a social media manager for Mr. Ruberwa. That was not accurate. I mistakenly wrote that because I was having trouble getting a picture up on his Wikipedia. I apologize I am new to this site. However, I categorically deny that I have gotten any payments whatsoever from him or his associates/affiliates, etc. I am not affiliated with him on a professional level whatsoever. All of my research has been done from a purely independent perspective. Please let me know if there's anything else you need from me to prove that I am not currently nor have I ever been paid for my work on his Wikipedia page. Eagle439 (talk) 23:41, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've stated you're 74.96.146.233 here, please try to remember to log in whenever you edit. This makes it easier for others to know it's actually you who's editing what and when, and also will help others avoid mistakening your edits for scok puppetry. In addition, an IP address can be geo-located by pretty much anyone who want to do so, while a registered account cannot; so, an IP address is actually less anonymoous than a registered account. There are certain cases where editing using multiple accounts is allowed, but you need to be really careful when you do so.

As for your connection to Ruberwa, you really shouldn't make any more similar claims on any more Wikipedia pages because it can give others the impression of a WP:APPARENTCOI. Based on what you posted above, you will be given the benefit of doubt; you should, however, also be aware that there are some pretty experienced Wikipedians who are quite adept at sorting out whether there's really a conflict of interest. The fact all of your edits so far have pretty much been to the same article or about content related to Ruberwa combine with your now retracted COI declaration is going likely to be viewed suspciously by much of the Wikipedia community. I'll remove the template from the article and the article talk page as a show of good faith, but another editor may disagree and decide to re-add them. If that happens, further discussion may be needed at WP:COIN to sort things out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:12, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly Your point on not using my IP address is well taken. I will make sure to double/triple check from now on. Also, thank you for giving me the benefit of doubt. To answer your question on why all my edits have only been on Ruberwa, it is because most of my (leisurely) research, the past few years, have been on the wars in the Congo and specifically on the Banyamulenge community, of which Ruberwa is a part of. I hope to start adding more insights from my research on the Banyamulenge community wiki page in the near future. Eagle439 (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful that statements like I hope to start adding more insights from my research on the Banyamulenge community wiki page in the near future do get misconstrued as Wikipedia:No original research since that's probably the first thing an experienced editor is going to think when they see it. In addition, be aware of WP:EXPERT and WP:SELFCITE if you're going to try and incorporate your own research into any articles; it's not impossible to do such a thing, but it tends to be viewed skeptically by the Wikipedia Community at large, especially if you're not a well-established and highly respected researcher in your field. Finally, being a WP:SPA is not necessarily a bad thing, but you can learn a lot about Wikipedia editing and how Wikipedia's various policies and guidelines are applied by moving outside a limited scope and trying to edit articles, even ones which you might not have a lot of interest in, that might need work. Just trying fix something as simple as spelling errors, etc. can be a good way of better learning how Wikipedia works. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I will make sure to thoroughly review all wikipedia policies and guidelines before posting anything (even comments on talk discussion pages) else. The statement you quoted was simply meant to be interpreted as "I will broaden my edits to include other pages besides Ruberwa's. Thank you for the warnings. Eagle439 (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]