User talk:ERcheck/Archive 14
This is an archive of past discussions about User:ERcheck. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
This is Archive 14 of my talk page. It is archived using the Cut-and-Paste method.
Below the line, you will find the talk portion of the page for January through December 2009.
AfD nomination of Samba d'Or
An article that you have been involved in editing, Samba d'Or, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samba d`or. Thank you. Smile a While (talk) 03:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Leagurian Mountains
Thanks for deleting this article. Black Tusk (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Lt. Gen. Victor H. Krulak
What a great Marine and patriot. Is he in the L"ist of historically famous Marines"? Tony the Marine (talk) 22:53, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- He is now (smile). Tony the Marine (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- To your first question: within a couple weeks. You'll see a header on my user and talk page before I board the plane. To your second comment: I'm not very well versed in the FA process. I've attempted to participate in a couple before, and I got lost in the nuances; debate over the capitalization of a single letter, the placements of commas, and other weighty issues that I know little about. I could attempt to assist you, but my research resources aren't going to be any better than yours, nor do I have the depth or breadth of experience you have in biographies. If you have any specific tasks you think I could handle, let me know. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 03:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: USAF Portal
Copy all, thanks much. And thanks for taking on the portal when it was clear no one else was doing it. Please accept a Military Barnstar for your work on both the USAF and Marine Corps portals. Ndunruh (talk) 14:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I should be albe to, at least in the near-term. I anticipate my duties becoming a great deal more rigerious in about a year's time, so I'll have to re-assess then, but for now I should be able to take it on. Ndunruh (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Marine biographies
Could you do me a favor? For the next month or so, let me know when you create a new article or add one to Category:United States Marine Corps generals? I'm blowing through that category, adding ribbon racks, and I'd hate to miss one because it was added after I finished with that letter. I'm keeping my project status up to date in User:bahamut0013/ribbon workshop#Project Status, and I saw your most recent one (Gen Christmas). Thanks! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 22:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, may I please ask a few questions?
I read your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie sarkis and I'd like ask a few general questions.
I've re-read the pages on deletion policy and notability guidelines. How would you suggest an editor go about handling an article like this one: Kent Stanley This is a new article written by a single author, likely autobiographical. It contains claims of notability, but no 3rd party sources. The only contributions by this author are on the article in question. Special:Contributions/HaroldKStanley
In a broad sense, how does one go about improving something like this? Do I need to gut the article and just make a stub saying something like:
- Kent Stanley is the senior associate athletics director for development at Utah State.
and cite: http://utahstateaggies.cstv.com/genrel/071808aaa.html
He may have had a good coaching career at Oklahoma City University, but I am not sure this individual is notable. What do I do now? Do I just leave it? Should I Prod? Afd?
Thank you very much for your time. Liberal Classic (talk) 06:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Spam in Epilepsy Foundation
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Epilepsy Foundation, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Epilepsy Foundation is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Epilepsy Foundation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
badges
I've been placing ID badges to the side of the ribbons for a neater appearance whenever possible. Wings and other badges go above. I'm really not sure what I'm going to do when I get into the Army bios, they have a tednancy to have lots and lots of badges and tabs and other accoutrements... bahamut0013wordsdeeds 23:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, and I appreciate the updates. Cheers! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 23:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for George R. Christmas
Gatoclass (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:N-YHS logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:N-YHS logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Good for deletion. Replaced by File:N-YHS logo.svg. — ERcheck (talk) 00:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
In transit
Just wanted to drop you a line. I'll let you all know when I make it to Al Asad. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for William K. Jones
Dravecky (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
RE: Andrea White
Thank You! --Obaidz96 (talk • contribs • count) 00:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- You asked about references for Andrea White being a partner with Locke & Liddell (now Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLP). What I can find online are various speaker profiles:
Red Rose Ball honoree, 2007, UH Downtown. "...went on to become the second female partner at the law firm Locke Liddell." Duchesne Book Fair, 2005. "...she attended the University of Texas Law School and went on to become the second female partner at the law firm Locke Liddell." HTH. — ERcheck (talk) 04:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Obaidz96"
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)
DYK for Chesley Sullenberger
Dravecky (talk) 10:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Need some admin help
I've made a bit of a mistake that I need an admin to help fix. I created Category:United States Marine Corps in fiction to categorize Marines n media, but then i realized that I forgot the distinction between fiction and non-fiction. In haste to fix the problem, I created Category:United States Marine Corps in non fiction. Now, I've got two categories for an almost identical purpose... And I'm also having some trouble deciding whether some media is fiction or non-fiction (some are based on but heavily adapted from real events, or semi-autobiographical, or dramatized versions of real events). Would you be able to merge them or rename one to United States Marine Corps in media? Thanks. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 07:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- I personally think it'd be better to lump them all in together. Sometimes the grey area is bigger, sometimes it is so small that you wouldn't notice without some research. It also simplifies mantenance and its easier to find in a search (in the sidebar or when using Hotcat). bahamut0013wordsdeeds 09:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Might as well, that way they don't get accidentally populated. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 09:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Portal
I'll check it out right after the Super Bowl. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- You did an excellent job. My team lost! oh well, there is alawys next year. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Bahamut0013's chevrons are in the picture? Amazing! You know something? I don't know Bahamut0013 personaly, but he is one hell of a great guy. There are some people here that you feel honored to have befriended and he is one of them. I always pray for his safety. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
A day late and a dollar short.
You're not going to believe what I just got in the mail... Five professionally printed photos from the 2nd MAW 2008 Marine Corps Ball. Golly, it took forever, and they are completely useless to me as far as Wikipedia is concerned, as I don't have a scanner. But damn, I look good, marching on as an escort! There is always that. :P bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well, the works are in the public domain: federal government employees on duty were the photographers. It woud be nice to scan them in, however. And I don't suppose you have much to worry about me... Al Asad is quite safe, being out in the middle of nowhere. I'm not expecting to leave the base, really... just another staff puke. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 05:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Elizabeth A. Okoreeh-Baah
An article that you have been involved in editing, Elizabeth A. Okoreeh-Baah, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth A. Okoreeh-Baah. Thank you. --Pascal666 (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Orlando Antigua
Thank you. You know someone said that Orlando Melendez was the first Puerto Rican to play for the Globetrotters and I wrote about him, but I remembered that when I met Orlando Antigua years ago, he told me that he was Puerto Rican, so the curiousity made me research him and the result was my ending up writting about him too. Amazing situation that Antigua had to face, right? Tony the Marine (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
New "GA"
Guess what? Hispanics in the United States Marine Corps just made "GA". Tony the Marine (talk) 04:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Table sorting
I took a look at Help:Sorting, and made a few changes... but I can't understand how to get dates to work right. I might try again tommorrow, some sleep may help recharge the brain cells; but I think we are fairly limited in how we can sort the columns. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 18:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Swing and a miss... that help page just confused me more, and I couldn't get it to work. Maybe the function works different at Meta? Sorry. I would recommend going to the WP:Help desk. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 11:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Looks pretty good; I couldn't find any problem. Now go fix Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps and Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps. :-D bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I noticed that on the CMC page... putting a zero in front of the single digits will work... 08, 09, etc. instead of 8, 9. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 06:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I simplified it... take a look. I used
<span style="display:none">05</span>
... as you can see, I skipped the "O" entirely. If you are referring to cases where the individual held more than one rank, then yes, adding an additional digit would help sort that. We humans usually read an integer from the base (decimal point) and left, but the software reads it from the first digit right. This means that the number of digits is irrelevant, but the precedence of the first digist to conflict are. For example, 09 and 090 are considered the same number as far as sorting is considered, but 092 is ahead of 0934560... I think. The best solution here is probably the decimals you tried elsewhere. But in reality, I really doubt it's worth this much skull sweat! How much functionality will this give a reader anyway? We have the basic mechanics in place, and it works well. Unless, of course, you are merely trying to expand your skill set; in which case I really don't have any more advice for you. Once we start getting into computational mathematics, I lose interest because I don't have room in my head for it. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I simplified it... take a look. I used
- I noticed that on the CMC page... putting a zero in front of the single digits will work... 08, 09, etc. instead of 8, 9. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 06:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Looks pretty good; I couldn't find any problem. Now go fix Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps and Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps. :-D bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
A little confused
I'm a little confused over the advice you left a user here. As far as I was aware, we didn't remove information simply because it is a "spoiler" or even warned readers about a potential spoiler. Even the guidelines for spoilers states that it is not acceptable to delete information simply because it is a spoiler, especially if it interferes with the article's completeness. It is only a "spoiler" by a few hours for only half the country. Do you really think it is necessary to remove information simply because one group of people haven't watched the show? If that's the case, we should probably remove all of the "spoiler" information until everyone's seen it. See? Slippery slope. Further, this isn't a work of fiction. It's a biography page. I didn't really think spoilers were possible on biography pages, so I found her suggestion and your permission a little...odd. I guess I'm just a little confused. I'd appreciate a little clarification about what is considered a spoiler and what constitutes removal of a spoiler. Thanks for any help. --132 14:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Megee
I used the ref: Who's Who in Marine Corps History... I thought that the text did conflict with the image as well. I hadn't created User:bahamut0013/ribbon workshop/incomplete at the time, but he's listed there now. If we can find any more references, then we can try to sort out which ones make more sense... but I think the Good Cookie makes sense, he was enlisted for almost five years before geting a commission. As far as the order goes, I've noticed that a loto of older photos are out of order... I think the precedence rules for non-US awards have changed since WWII. I sort them by personal awards, unit awards, and then service & campaign awards last. This is the current rule, and unless I know of a specific change in the rules (such as the Navy Distinguished Service Medal being superior to the Navy Cross many years ago) that makes sense for the time period the individual served, I default to the modern regulations. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 05:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- The photos aren't always up to date, however... that's why I use them as a guide only, and I usually trust the prose over the photo if it makes more logical sense. If you look at the incomplete page, you'll see a few instances when what appears to be on thier chest doesn't make a lick of sense, but the prose does. It doesn't help that often these photos are monochromatic, small resolution, or both; it's easly to confuse one ribbon for another, especially when we start adding foreign awards to the mix! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 06:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Die Heuwels Fantasies
Thanks for leaving the message on my talk page. I really appreciate that you let me know about the speedy deletion and how I can respond to it. Since it's too late to stop the deletion, I'm going to start the page again, this time trying to make the band's notibility clear (according to the Band Notibility guidelines you provided a link to). If I'm going about this the wrong way, please let me know. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FlorisGroen (talk • contribs) 13:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Cibola High Politics
I'm not associated with the website in any way. I don't even know who they are. They just appear on Fox News and their website...I need help to make this article notable. IM A NEWB!(MANACASAREZ (talk) 04:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC))
And you didn't bother to help?? Geez (MANACASAREZ (talk) 04:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC))
- See talk page response. Guidance has been provided in each message. — ERcheck (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
What? That's my website. Wow. I didn't see the popularity of our website getting this large. 1,800 hits a day and climbing.(Planecrash111 (talk) 04:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC))
- See alexa.com — though 1800 hits seems high, it is low in terms of notability for a website. — ERcheck (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi!
Feel free to go ahead and revert the deletion; thank you very much for asking. I deleted it aas a possible copyvio which didn't assert the notability. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- No prob. Someone else tagged it for notability, but it looked like a copyvio to me. No Google hits, so it's OK. I'll go ahead and restore it for ya. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
need some more admin help
Need some admin help regarding a troublesome anon IP user who keeps re-adding an external link for a non-notable parody to 8-Bit Theater. See discussion at Talk:8-Bit Theater#Flash movies. I origionally assumed this was a simple good-faith error, but the anon has repeatedly ignored attempts to communicate, even undoing one of User:XLinkBot's many warnings. We would appreciate your thoughts on doing a short block to spur the user into communicating with us. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 09:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you sir, hopefully this will get him or her to talk to us about this issue. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 05:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Richard C. Mangrum
Royalbroil 04:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Bio needing your assistance
Good stuff on the DYK for Richard Mangrum. He was a big time part of USMC Aviation history and one of the four iron horses of Guadalcanal. I came across this article, Charles Tatum, while looking at info for the upcoming miniseries The Pacific. I was hoping you might be able to do some of that voodoo you do. Hope all is well. --Looper5920 (talk) 13:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- After a second look I am not even sure if this guys notability rates a bio. What do you think?--Looper5920 (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
truthout in references
Hi, i was reviewing some edits and i noticed you referenced truthout.org as t r u t h o u t, which is unusual to say the least. What is the thinking behind this special formatting? Thanks in advance. Bonewah (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- here's the diff on that edit. Bonewah (talk) 18:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your clarification on that, makes total sense to me. Bonewah (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Marine Corps Air Station Santa Barbara
Royalbroil 12:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Help
- Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#List_of_United_States_Naval_Academy_alumni_FLC_help — Rlevse • Talk • 02:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009
- News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Germ Out
I would like to withdraw my article on Germ Out from Wikipedia. How do I do it? Thank you.--JSHibbard (talk) 20:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Needs some work
Any interest in sprucing these up a bit? Melvin Maas and Charles Tatum?--Looper5920 (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I started a bio for John F. Bolt in my Sandbox. take a look and see if there is anything you can add if you ge tthe chance.
- Another one for good measure...Archibald H. Gillespie.--Looper5920 (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion of Germ Out Article
I have read the conflict of interest definitions and the reasons why other companies (sic Purell and Germ-X) qualify for Wikipedia articles and J & A Companies, L.L.C. (Germ Out) may not qualify. Since I was the only author for the Germ Out article, I would like to request a speedy deletion of the Germ Out article from Wikipedia. Thank you for your help and cooperation.--JSHibbard (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
new image
Take a look: {{USMC-stub}} {{USMC-bio-stub}} bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- Question 1
2 (the first one): Not particularly. When loading an image that is smaller than the full resolution, I believe that most browsers will load the full image size and shrink it for the thumbnail (not 100% sure, and I'm sure it varies from browser to browser). I just didn't want to make the image so tall that there is a large amount of white space above and below the text. If there was a gain, it would be negligable anyway. - Question 2
(the second one): The image in question is a .SVG file. The nature of a Scalable Vector Graphics means that larger or smaller images are completely unnecessary: the image quality and size are the same at every conceivable resolution of the thumbnail. Not to mention that manually swapping them out would take months, even a bot would take many days to complete such a task. - Question 3: We could, but I'm not at all convinced that it would be worth doing. The current solution works perfectly fine, and I don't see any potential gain for the amount of tedious man-hours it would take to replace the current usage. Of course, if you know somebody who would be willing to program a bot, then I might make a template for it to use; but I would expect your help in fixing any false positives the bot mindlessly created. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, sure, that seems like a good shortcut. But you've demonstrated sufficient knowledge of templates that you don't need my help with that. :P Just keep in mind that {{USMCportal}} is already in use, you'd have to find a different name. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 19:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm suprised, this is as simple as a template could get. Anyway, take a look at {{USMCportallink}}. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 08:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- The administrative junk has been resolved. If I missed anything, let me know. I also forgot to note earlier that {{US Marine Corps navbox}} also links to the portal; it won't be necessary to duplicate this unless you really desire to have it under the "See also" section of an article. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 13:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm suprised, this is as simple as a template could get. Anyway, take a look at {{USMCportallink}}. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 08:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, sure, that seems like a good shortcut. But you've demonstrated sufficient knowledge of templates that you don't need my help with that. :P Just keep in mind that {{USMCportal}} is already in use, you'd have to find a different name. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 19:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
- Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
- News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
PD review
See commons:Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#PD_review. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
List of U.S. Marines
You have truely done an excellent job with the referencing in the list. I am amazed, I only wish that I could have pitched in, but real life issues have overwhelmed me. Semper Fi, Tony the Marine (talk) 03:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey
Thanks for deleting his page! JMS Old Al (talk) 04:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Question
What would you say to an "FLC" nomination for List of Hispanic Medal of Honor recipients? Do you think that it may have a chance. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Charles Heywood
I thought you might be interested in this: Heywood was not a Medal of Honor recipient. Cheers! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 06:30, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to write it off as a good-faith edit. If you look at the history, I changed my mind twice. :P I dunno what that award is, but it does look remarkably similar to the Civil-War era MOH... but as I can tell, it wasn't unusual at all for the period to have officers wearing strange awards, whether foreign or commemorative, that weren't authorized for wear in the US. The question is how I missed it the first time; I'm going through Category:United States Marine Corps generals again to cleanup any mistakes I've made. If you get some spare time, it'd be cool if you could take a look at User:bahamut0013/ribbon workshop/incomplete and see if you have any info on those names there.
- You know, its amazing how much I've learned in two years by editing Wikipedia. I had absolutley zero biographical experience, and knew so very little about the awards and decorations of the United States (aside from my own meager ribbon rack). bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
- Special report: Community weighs license update
- News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
- News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
- WikiProject report: WikiProject China
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
talk pages of redirect articles
I have a question about policy, and I couldn't find the answer at WP:redirect. I've recently found a few stub articles that are unlikely to ever grow past start-class at best, and merged thier content into a very closely-related article. However, there has been a little bit of content discussion on the talk pages. Should I leave the talk pages alone, or copy the content into the main talk page and redirect?
For example, Platoon Leaders Class and Officer Candidates Course seemed unlikely to grow beyond what they were, so I merged them to Officer Candidates School (U.S. Marine Corps), and the combined article makes for a much more rich understanding. However, the talk pages have some discussion, and they are still into Category:Stub-Class military history articles and the like because of {{WPMILHIST}} being on the talk pages. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 06:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Addendum: I am done building ribbon racks for Category:United States Marine Corps generals. Can I get an "amen"? Now I get to move on to an even bigger category with less useful references! YAY!
- In seriousness, please let me know when you create a new article for this category and I will do my magic on it, if I can find a suitable reference. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Have a look
I just created a page for John F. Bolt. Take a look and have a crack at any corrections you think could be made. Thanks--Looper5920 (talk) 00:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Do you think Bolt might be a god DYK candidate?--Looper5920 (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- License update: Licensing vote begins
- News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
- Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image was either individually tagged or was in a category tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:Clinton congratulates Medal of Honor recipient Vernon Baker.jpg. During the move I changed the name of the image to better reflect Naming Conventions policy, duplicate file name and/or Commons naming restrictions. Any links to the image has been updated to reflect the new name as it exists now on Commons. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#F8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for John F. Bolt
Dravecky (talk) 02:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
- Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
- News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
- Dispatches: Valued pictures
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Bea Arthur Part2
- Attention my fellow comrades. User:Chrisrus, has provided us with the site: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2PUgDa1jy4) in which Arthur is supposed to have stated (I say "supposed" only because my internet connection is so slow that I haven't looked at it) that she was never a member of the United States Marine Corps. We "must" look into this because if it true then her name must be removed from the List of U.S. Marines. Please take a look and make recommendations. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- You've made a really good point. It seems as if Bea has always been a tough subject in regard to her USMC sevice, only if she would come out and strighten things out. Right now there is discussion going on the article's (Bea's) talk page about that. In regard to the list, I am not going to act on it, but I think that our other comrades will also agree with your observation once they read it. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Nice work cleaning up. I did some tonight, and did some a while ago (I happened to "random" into the Gallery Furniture article, which I've merged and redirected). I still can't decide if the article should be brought up at AfD--there is coverage, but it's all disparate, just a bunch of single events. Any thoughts? Drmies (talk) 02:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Some planned moves
I've been slightly irritated by some of the haphazard naming conventions used for a year or so, and I'm thinking that I might work my way through Category:United States Marine Corps and change all instances of "U.S. Marine Corps" to "United States Marine Corps" for article titles. I'm big on consistancy, especially since I have a hard time remembering which version to type in to get to a specific article (for example, in trying to reach List of U.S. Marines, I always goof and type "List of United States Marines" into the search bar). Can you think of any reason why I shouldn't perform these moves? bahamut0013wordsdeeds 05:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Picture of the year in commons
Thought you might be interested in taking a look at the Picture of the Year nominations in Wikimedia Commons. It contains a USMC picture. Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Finalists. s/f, FieldMarine (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Expand?
- Bruno Hochmuth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.140.53 (talk) 21:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
- News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
- WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
- Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Gift
bahamut0013wordsdeeds has given you a B83 variable yield thermonuclear bomb! B83 variable yield thermonuclear bombs promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a B83 variable yield thermonuclear bomb, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy burning!
Spread the goodness of B83 variable yield thermonuclear bomb by adding {{B83 variable yield thermonuclear bomb}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or use this B83 variable yield thermonuclear bomb to raze the giver's talk page with {{Mutually Assured Destruction}}!
Haven't seen you about much lately. Hope all is well. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Remember when we were looking at images to use in the USMC portal for War dog?? You mentioned you were a canine aficionado, so you might appreciate this link. Cheers! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 07:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I also thought you might be interested in this quote from the Marine Corps Times (May 11, 2009, page 7):
“ | STAR ATHLETES RECOGNIZED
Commandant Gen. James Conway will induct [into the United States Marine Corps Sports Hall of Fame] Ernie Cheatham, Andy Philip, Morris Fisher and Jo Jo White during a ceremony at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va., on Aug. 14, Marine officials said. As a Marine, Cheatham rose to the level of lieutenant general, receiving a Navy Cross for his leadership during the Vietnam War. A standout defensive tackle at Loyola Marymount University in the early 1950s, he played for the Pittsburgh Steelers and Baltimore Colts before deciding to pursue a career in the Corps. Philip joined the Corps after starring as a point guard on the University of Illinois basketball team in the 1940s, and served as a first lieutenant before returning to professional sports. He went on to win a championship as a member of the 1957 Celtics. White, a former Marine private, served as a cornerstone for two Celtics championship teams in the 1970s. He also won an Olympic gold medal in 1968 with the U.S. men’s basketball team. Fisher retired as a sergeant major and won five Olympic gold medals with his rifle during the 1920 and 1924 Olympics. |
” |
- I know you've not been around much lately, but I thought it might pique your interest in adding them to List of notable United States Marines. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 07:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:USNavy_Distinguished_Public_Service_Medal.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:USNavy_Distinguished_Public_Service_Medal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 09:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- I've taken care of this. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 07:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Writers needed
- Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
- Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
- News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Patrick M. Novack Article
As a person that was largely involved in the "Silver Star Debate", I would like your opinion on the deletion of the article for Patrick M. Novack. I believe that there is enough there (Law Enforcement commendations, Communtiy Service accolades) that when combined with the Silver Stars he earned in Vietnam (and the fact that he was the Team Leader of a Special Forces LRRP Team), he should be considered notable. Fair disclosure, I am the man's son. Please comment if you would. Rapier1 (talk) 17:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Browsing the archives
- Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
- Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
- News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Portal
Thought I'd give you a heads up: Portal talk:United States Marine Corps#new section. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Take a look at all of the months if you get some time and make your usual tweaks: Portal:United States Marine Corps/history. You're pretty good at the polishing-off of portal items. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 10:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
- News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
- Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Admin action
I wanted to throw this up on your admin radar: User:Doodoobear1856 is a vandalism-only account, and has thrown some nasty comments on my talk page. Tony said that he would take care of him if he did it again, but I think he (Tony) is done for the night, and I was hoping you could get to it before he does. 'Twould be much appreciated if you can help in some way. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- The above matter has been settled. Here's something else for you though: Archibald Sommers is in desperate need of your biography magic. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 17:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
- News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
AFD
There is an AFD on page you edited, Brian D. Beaudreault.Historicist (talk) 21:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
ACN Inc.
- Nevermind, ERCheck! I saw that you hadn't been around for several days, and that I needed to take matters into my own hands. I reported the guy for edit warring (and sockpuppetry, too), and the matter is apparently resolved. So, we're good to go. Mike (talk) 04:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi ERCheck. Since you've been involved with the article on ACN, I am turning to you in the hope that you could possibly have a look at what a brand-new user going by the moniker of TheEditor22 is doing to it? Have a look also at what he's been saying on the Talk page (and my own user Talk page. He seems to be a bit ... odd. I'm not experienced in it, but it appears there needs to be some kind of dispute resolution needed, and talking with him isn't going to do it, as he seems to think he's acting according to some kind of Wikipedia consensus. Mike (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
May I present the following, written not to me but to another editor:
- An Amyway presenter says "this is the best opportunity in the world, that exists, period". This article just clafifies how deluded you are, or indeed, how incredibily biased you are. I am almost certain that you are in some way renumerated by presenting this MLM companies as being legitimate. Yes...I've looked through your history. You are a truly evil character, to want to deceive somewhat naive people into believing that these MLM companies are a good opportunity. In fact, you truly sicken me. --TheEditor22 (talk) 20:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Mike (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
This in fact continues on the RS page: When a reliable source clearly is not. Mike (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
I am wondering if this user TheEditor22 has a sock puppet named Martin Ford which has also weighed in on the discussion. Both users edited for the first time within an hour of each other (TheEditor22 - 17:56, 28 June 2009 and Martin Ford - 16:56, 28 June 2009) and have concerned themselves solely with this article. Since he seems to be well-familiar with Wikipedia editing, I wouldn't be surprised that TheEditor22 is a sock puppet himself.
If it sounds like I'm frustrated and not sure what to do about all this -- and trying to stay out of the edit war, too -- well, that's what it is. If you cannot assist in taming this situation, can you suggest how to go about it? Thanks! Mike (talk) 18:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Jackson's death, new data center, more
- Wikipedia in the news: Google News Support, Wired editor plagiarizes Wikipedia, Rohde's kidnapping, Michael Jackson
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment
A person who has never before been involved in the management of the "List of U.S. Marines" has expressed him/herself here: Talk:List of notable United States Marines#Remove edit warning. Since you have been actively involved in the management of this list, please express your opinion. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:DonnaKane 1995.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DonnaKane 1995.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 06:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:YHanani BachCelloSuites.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:YHanani BachCelloSuites.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 07:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Notice: BLP written like a resume
Take a look at Steve Brozak, if you get the time. There are a number of SPAs dedicated to making sure the article looks like a resume and advertisement for the companies he runs, with no references. It didn't even take 12 hours for one of them to remove the cleanup tags I added. I'm not very knowledgable in the notability of businessmen, so perhaps you can make the judgement on whether or not he's notable enough for inclusion. He certainly doesn't have any notability as a military person. At the very least, I hope you can take a swing at removing some of the POV wording. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 04:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 09:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:NewUlm Texas logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NewUlm Texas logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 21:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Editnotice discussion
If you haven't noticed the discussion at Talk:List of notable United States Marines#Remove edit warning, then please take a look; we are considering using template:editnotice, but it requires an admin to use it in article space. Tony and I have been conversing back and forth a bit on our talk pages as well, but here's the gist: we both agree it might be good for a trial run, but he's not confident in his tech skills to make it work right the first try. I'm uncomfortable with doing trying it through a proxy, since that necessitates periods of time (possibly lengthy ones) where a flawed template is viewable by the public, and I can't really think of how to do a trial or sandbox with something like that. I figured you had a good enough grasp of coding and formatting that you could handle it, if you are interested in getting onvolved. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 09:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- I figure that the text that's already in the lead paragraph would do fine. As far as implementation goes, I think WP:edit notice covers it all. However, if you don't have the time to fiddle with it, I think that defeats the purpose of getting you involved, because surely we will have to tweak it a few times. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 10:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think we have to have the entire warning there in the template. Directing a casual editor to read a warning on another page will probably get disregarded, but having the warning there is more likely to work. You should add your tweaks, then get Tony to read it, and if he doesn't have any modifications of his own, we can post a preview on the talk page to see if anyone else has a comment. Then, we can agree on a time to implement where we would both be available to make any quick mods if the thing doesn't work/look right. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- I looked at "editnotice" in your Sandbox and it looks real fine to me. By the way ER, I wrote an article about the last uprising in Puerto Rico against Spanish colonial in 1897 one year before the Spanish-American War. The cool thing about the article is that this event, where the Puerto Rican flag was unfurled in Puerto Rican soil for the first time, has been omitted from the history books and almost no one knows about it. You can't even find it in the internet and my descentdents on my mothers side, the Mattei's, where protagonists. Check it out when you time: Intentona de Yauco. Tony the Marine (talk) 07:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
- News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Re:Edit notice implemented
Looks good! Did you check out Felix Rigau Carrera? Tony the Marine (talk) 02:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
- Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
- Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
- Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
- News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
- Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 16:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Good bio
Not sure if you have been editing at all these days. i have been on a bit of a hiatus as well. Came across this today and thought you may like to take a crack at it. Hope all is well.--Looper5920 (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
- From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
- News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
- Opinion essay: White Barbarian
- Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
- Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
- News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009
- New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
- Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
- News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
General Nyland
I finally found the photo we discussed last year, and added it to General Nyland's article. I was surprised to discover there is a second general in the photo -- Lieutenant General Bruce B. Knutson. It may be rather rare to find a single photo of so few midshipmen (5) including more than one future Marine Corps General. Thewellman (talk) 06:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know if copies of University of New Mexico Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps public affairs publications still exist. I recall at least two. There was a quarterly newsletter called the Sunline and an annual yearbook called the Mark ##, where ## were the last two digits of the year of publication 19##. I scanned the image from a print I salvaged 40 years ago from discarded pre-publication masters. Thewellman (talk) 14:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Inactive
Haven't seen you around much lately. Hope all is well with you. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 16:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- 'Bout time, doncha think? :D bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
WikiBirthday
I saw from here that it's been exactly four years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 12:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
- Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup
- Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia
- Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report
- Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway
- Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
- New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol
- German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists
- Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris
- Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November
- News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more
- In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more
- Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
- Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues
- News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more
- In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Happy Thanksgiving
Happy Thanksgiving Tony the Marine (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week