User talk:E. Edgeworth

Fork etiquette

Hello. I have again reverted your edits to Fork etiquette. The article currently describes two different methods, the American "zigzag" style and the European style. You have edited the article several times to change the description of the zigzag style to be the same as the description of the continental style. This not only makes the article self-contradictory, but it is contrary to the sources cited in the article. If you have any questions about the article or suggestions for improving it, please bring them up on the talk page.--Trystan (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Role-playing game has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Role-playing game. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Role-playing game. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Kingpin13 (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'm sorry, it was you adding the "bold text" which made me think it was vandalism. Also in future, when removing content please state in the edit summary why you are removing it. Thanks - Kingpin13 (talk) 21:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Role-playing game. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Wyatt Riot (talk) 20:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]