User talk:E.F Edits

Welcome!

Hello, E.F Edits, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on minor parties

I see you have created another article on a party (or rather an alliance) that never won a seat. I do not think this is particularly useful think to do. I have been thinking for a couple of years of creating a List of minor political parties in Israel and list all of the ones that unsuccesfully contested elections and redirect all the titles there? Number 5 7 17:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number 5 7 In the Arab List have two parties that was in the Kneset and they get more votes from U'Bizchutan, Or] and other new and not notable parties in Israel but they get article. Ther is article on Zehut before they even ran, so why not? Why delet information?--E.F Edits (talk) 18:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think those articles should exist either (although actually U'Bizchutan is probably notable for being a female ultra-Orthodox party so perhaps is article-worthy), and citing their existence is a bit WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. What do you think about merging them all into a list? Number 5 7 19:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number 5 7 No, why that no all of them get article? like in Germany or Australia or UK. The englis Wikipedia relevant world, why that it be writing by west world narrative?--E.F Edits (talk) 19:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? We don't have articles for every British or German political party – there are many, many parties without them (you can see how many just from the 2010 British elections don't here). You are not making a convincing case here. Number 5 7 19:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number 5 7 Alliance for Green Socialism,Common Sense Party (UK),Peace Party (UK), Animal Protection Party...--E.F Edits (talk) 19:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And? You said all of them have articles and I've shown you otherwise. There are perhaps a small number of Israeli parties worthy of standlone articles (Ale Yarok and the Greens) but the vast majority could easily be combined into a list than stay as a poorly referenced permastub. Number 5 7 20:33, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

can we continue this discussion tomorrow or in Thursday? now this med night in Israel--E.F Edits (talk) 20:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, there is no deadline for you to respond. Number 5 7 20:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number 5 7 I support in your idea on condition that the new articel Will include all the info that presenting in the articels of the parties, I'm against erasing informationE.F Edits (talk) 18:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will hopefully get round to doing it at some point in the near future. Also, could you add sources for the ideologies you are adding to party articles? They tend to be potentially controversial so need a reference. Cheers, Number 5 7 14:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number 5 7My problem is that my sources are in HebrewE.F Edits (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem with using Hebrew sources. English Wikipedia is not limited to the use of English sources. Number 5 7 14:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number 5 7 I added sources to Yamin Yisrael and Brit Olam. I dont think that this nedded to Yachad (the list includ "Otzma Yehudit") or Yisrael BaAliyah E.F Edits (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Becareful those IP

We can doubt that these are the same person.--O1lI0 (talk) 08:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use the Daily Mail as a source

See this discussion. It's one of the worst of the tabloid newspapers, with a terrible reputation for facts. If that article were accurate it would have been in the American mainstream press, not just a British paper. The article makes it clear that this whole thing is based on an unverified report which itself was barely mentioned in the media. Someone will revert you and this is why. Doug Weller talk 15:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antifa - please stop adding inaccurate information claiming that the movement has been proclaimed terrorist

You really need to stop this slow edit war. If you read the article you will see the basis of some of the mistakes that got into two of the few sources that repeated the Politico source. There has been absolutely no official statement. If there had been it would have been in major American newspapers. Doug Weller talk 19:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, E.F Edits. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lehava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at User talk:SwisterTwister

Hi there. Please note that SwisterTwister has been blocked indefinetely and thus cannot reply to your messages. If you wish for a new review, just hit the blue "Resubmit" button on the page. Regards So Why 11:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ale Yarok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reference and punctuation

Hey, I saw your edits on Karin Mayer Rubinstein ,please notice that in English Wikipedia the reference tag should come after the punctuation. I saw your edits in Tomer Aviram. Plese read Help:Referencing for beginners. Also don't link dated, such 2018 or May 4 etc, don't do that. Sokuya (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pirate Party of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, E.F Edits. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Patrick Aloni

Hello, E.F Edits. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrick Aloni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Patrick Aloni

Hello, E.F Edits. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patrick Aloni".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Aloni - large amount of unverified information

Hi my friend. I hope you are fine. I have removed a lot of unreferenced information. The new page review is one of the last approval stages, so when I see a page like this with a large amount of unreferenced information, and no {{In use}} tag to show that the page is undergoing a major build, I tend to err on the side of caution and remove the unreferenced information. The easiest solution is for you to add the tag to indicate the page is still under construction (if it is). This prevents me and other editors from editing the page until the process is complete and the tag is removed. Please assume good faith of me, as I do of you. By all means add the information again when you can add the references. Very best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Aloni moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Patrick Aloni, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Patrick Aloni

Hello, E.F Edits. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patrick Aloni".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]