Jump to content

User talk:DynamiteIce

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi DynamiteIce! I noticed your contributions to Juan Mata and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Mattythewhite (talk) 12:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Leave new message| Greetings!}} Hi DyanmiteIce. Hope all is well. I am so excited and glad to see you diligently editing THE9's Wikipedia page! I ran into you when I was looking for sources to edit, and noticed that you've added information for not only the group but individual members as well! So touched and so grateful! Just want to say that I really appreciate your hard work and it's definitely being seen by others!!! <3 Natgleira1106 Natgleira1106 (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not

[edit]

Stop icon Do not update players' caps like you did BEFORE the final whistle, per WP:LIVESCORES. Consider this as your only warning. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 17:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Andrew nyr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Zeng Keni & Liu Lingzi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 04:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew, I was just completing the track-list for their new album! @Andrewnyr. Thanks. DynamiteIce (talk) 04:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kim Yong-ji

[edit]

Hello, DynamiteIce,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Kim Yong-ji, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 15:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Xu Yiyang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable entertainer - no charting singles and finished 8th in a reality show.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 02:31, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Chungha, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 (📣📝) 04:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Paper9oll. An edit that you recently made to Krystal Jung seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Paper9oll (📣📝) 09:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chungha have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please don't go around and change Korean to Original, this is English Wikipedia not Korean Wikipedia hence Korean is the correct word/term to use. Paper9oll (📣📝) 10:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthony Elanga for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Elanga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Elanga (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PeeJay 19:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yang Yoo-jin moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Yang Yoo-jin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [utc] 07:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please stop going around and adding Hanja to the lead section, it should only be included in the lead section if the article doesn't have infoboxes. Please also stop removing headercolor=transparent from the infobox, it is not an improvement and is also not consistent with the background color of Infobox muscial artists module which is inherit (transparent). And also making child=yes onto newline, same as above it is not an improvement. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is this vandalism ? DynamiteIce (talk) 10:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DynamiteIce: I told you to stop adding hanja to lead section, however you chosen to ignore it. As per MOS:KO#Introductory sentence, it should only include the English name (hangul name and prounciation if applicable). As per MOS:KO#Hangul and Hanja, it should only be included in the infobox. If the article doesn't have infobox, then it is okay to include it in lead section. I would however like to thanks you for adding headercolor=transparent however please stop adding hanja to lead section. I will self-retract the level 2 warning, however please don't add hanja to lead section else I will have to issue it again which I hopefully don't have to. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Wadamz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wadamz. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi, what is a sockpuppet and why am i blocked? i am just creating articles and trying to improve on them. DynamiteIce (talk) 03:48, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DynamiteIce (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I am here requesting to be unblocked as I do not know why I am blocked. I have read the sockpuppet part but I am not a sockpuppet of that guy. I may have reverted the edit that may have seem to be a vandalism and I will not do it again. This is the only account I have and I promised so. I understand and will not disrupt any edits that other editors have made and I genuinely am just passionate about editing in Wikipedia. I really hope I can be unblocked and can continue editing. Thank You. 🥺🥺

Decline reason:

You'll have to do more than just deny it, as the editing patters are too similar to be a simple coincidence. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DynamiteIce (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. Actually I have seen the edits made through the blocked log you guys are discussing about and I understand where you guys are coming from. The edits are similar based on the information there. I understand you guys! May I perhaps get a second chance and improve some articles and put it in my talk page and be given a chance? I really am passionate about editing and I want to make constructive edits! I hope to prove that I can contribute to the Wikipedia society. I know that I may have vandlised or made some disruptive actions by adding the Hanjas in the articles but I would not do it again. Also, I have learnt about the consequences of Sockpuppetry through this and I would not do it. I hope I can be unblocked as I want to contribute to the Wikipedia society! Also, I understood where you guys are coming from. Thank You! DynamiteIce (talk) 17:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DynamiteIce (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I do not know what does same IP range means, can I know what it is? To be honest I don’t really know what I can do now since I guess you guys have the “evidence”. I think this is not valid and cannot be proven but Wadamz was created like about a century ago, when I was just a little kid. I do not think this will help much, but it is okay. I am willing to cooperate and is there any way for me to be unblocked in anyway? Or I am unable to edit on Wikipedia anymore. I understand the reason why I was blocked and learnt a lot through this. Hope to hear from anyone soon on what I can do! I enjoy editing and it is nice to edit. I hope I can contribute to the Wikipeidia society and have learnt a lot. It is quite sad to see some articles I created being deleted haha! Hope to hear from anyone soon. Thank You and have a good day!!🥺🥺DynamiteIce (talk) 08:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Would have been a lot easier if you hadn't started out by lying. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 00:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DynamiteIce (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. May I know how I could get unblocked? Hope someone is able to reply me! Thank You! DynamiteIce (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is already an open unblock request above. Creating more will not get your request resolved any sooner. SQLQuery me! 18:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Lee Si-woo (actress) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Si-woo (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Si-woo (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 18:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DynamiteIce (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, is there any way that I can do and be unblocked? It has been 2 months and I miss editing! I hope I can be unblocked. Thank You! DynamiteIce (talk) 08:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Read over the standard offer. You need to wait 6 months from your block for this. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 08:18, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DynamiteIce (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So this will mean I have to wait until around January 2022 to be unblocked right? Thank You. DynamiteIce (talk) 18:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The standard offer would be 6 months from the date of your block, which would be October 23rd. This does not however guarantee an unblock, this is recommended to show you understand the block, that there are no other socks of yours editing, and you do not edit Wikipedia in any fashion. At that point, we may consider an unblock. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.