User talk:Dunnothing

This is Dunnothing's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nancy Elementary School (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm sorry- this does not pass WP:NSCHOOL. Please merge into the Nancy, Kentucky article?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nancy Elementary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 17:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dunnothing! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 17:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somerset Cemetery (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Somerset Cemetery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somerset Cemetery (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Somerset Cemetery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 19:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 22:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dunnothing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I mean this I really regret my vandalism undescribably, I regret my past decisons, I've changed, I found myself making many useful edits lately instead of vandalism, I am so, so sorry, I would love to make useful edits on Wikipedia again, If you give me a chance I would love to make useful edits, Please consider my request

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 10:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla What am I supposed to say? Dunnothing

WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. You need to specifically and directly address your violations of WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 15:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla I don't understand, I admitted I was wrong, I've changed, I regret my past decisions, And i've been making more useful edits, I just hope that I can show you by considering my request, What more is there to say, I'm sorry. Dunnothing

Your previous unblock request addressed your deliberate vandalism and indicated you would make useful edits. But that's not why you were blocked. You were blocked for violating WP:SOCK but don't appear to have even read that policy, let alone directly addressed it. --Yamla (talk) 15:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know i'm so, so sorry, I regret my vandalism, I won't continuously make accounts like that anymore, I just regret it. Dunnothing (talk) 15:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Go back to your original account and make your unblock request there. Note that you've been so massively abusive, there's basically no chance you'll be unblocked in the near future. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits and then apply under WP:SO. To help you out, I will modify this block to match those of your other accounts, revoking talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #79022

is closed. What Yamla said. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]