User talk:Dssep

Welcome!

Hi Dssep! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 21:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib THERE IS 18 reliable sources. The Dawn, Indian Express, Express Tribune and Other sources are Reliable. No need to keep the article in Draft Space Dssep (talk) 14:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? I don't see it passing WP:GNG so you'll have to submit it for review and follow the proper process. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib It's Equal. If it is in main space or submit for review. The Article is Notable and With Reliable Sources Dssep (talk) 14:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of arguing with me, please focus on improving the draft and prepare it for review. I won't revert it, and if you do, I'll report it. There's a lot of WP:UPE activity in this area, so I'll ensure each page meets at least WP:GNG. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I find the creation of the redirect immediately followed by page creation by another user very eye raising. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CNMall41, I have filed SPI @ Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hypothetically007. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jaan Say Pyara Juni moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jaan Say Pyara Juni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dssep, Why aren't you following the proper review procedure? @Bonadea:— Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello Dssep. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dssep. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dssep|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib No, I'm not a paid editor. I'm Just editing in my own interest as The editing is my Hobby Dssep (talk) 08:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But your editing behavior is unacceptable. Please do not evade the AFC review process. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib OK Dssep (talk) 08:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib Recently you moved the Jaan Say Pyara Juni to the draft. The article passes WP:GNG and was with Reliable sources like Dawn (newspaper), BOL Network and other. You should keep the article in the main Space Dssep (talk) 08:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe it meets the GNG, then submit it for review but refrain from moving it to the main NS. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Umro Ayyar - A New Beginning moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Umro Ayyar - A New Beginning. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 06:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 06:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Teri Chhaon Mein" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Teri Chhaon Mein has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 29 § Teri Chhaon Mein until a consensus is reached. Allan Nonymous (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]