User talk:Dsalinasgardon

Welcome!

Hello, Dsalinasgardon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:04, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Salina. You seem to be very focused on the Contentstack product. Can you please begin by assuring me that you have read and understood the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline? If you have any connection with the company that manufactures Contentstack, you must declare it. In the meantime, it is not my decision whether the page gets restored, it is the community's. You can submit the draft for consideration by more experienced editors and I don't plan to participate in that discussion. If it is decided that the topic is written in a neutral manner and that notability is demonstrated, then an administrator will place it in the encyclopedia. Deb (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This is a near-duplicate of Draft:Contentstack. I'm assuming the one in draft space is what we're supposed to be reviewing. Please continue to update that one, and don't resubmit this sandbox copy. In fact, to avoid confusion, it would be best if you deleted this copy. It's generally a poor idea to have multiple copies of the same article. The history system preserves all edits and makes it easy to review all old versions, and revert to one of them if desired.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dsalinasgardon/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Dsalinasgardon/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 13:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dsalinasgardon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 13:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Contentstack (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This looks like an exact copy of Contentstack, which was deleted twice under WP:G11 (unambiguous advertising). Simply resubmitting it here without changes is pointless.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Contentstack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Contentstack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 14:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Built.io (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Built.io and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Built.io, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Contentstack has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Contentstack. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 20:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Built.io

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Built.io, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Built.io has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Built.io. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 20:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Contentstack has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Contentstack. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Contentstack

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Contentstack, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Sorry, Selina, but your recent actions have forced me to give you this final warning. Please take note and understand that, once you are blocked, you won't be able to return.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 08:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Digital Experience Platform

The article Digital Experience Platform has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NEOLOGISM lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]