User talk:Drinkdrinker

Welcome!

Hello, Drinkdrinker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fit 2 Fat 2 Fit, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fit 2 Fat 2 Fit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fit 2 Fat 2 Fit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ridernyc (talk) 15:18, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sgt. Pepper straw poll

There is currently a straw poll taking place here. Your input would be appreciated. ~ GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 23:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 01:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 21:17, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Swords (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to My Chemical Romance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Can't Imagine The World Without Me, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gil Norton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lustra

The Best Of Echobelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lustra

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Echobelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Deon McCaulay, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 19:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Newwikiprofile001. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Timeline_of_al-Qaeda_attacks because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 20:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:PeeJay2K3, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:Status, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. → Call me Hahc21 18:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Funeral (album) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

South Bromsgrove High School

Before I revert your addition again, either please discuss why you think routine Ofsted reports are an award, or place the Ofsted report in a more appropriate section. Many thanks.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Suburban Rock 'n' Roll may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [Mark Cowley @ HUG Management – management

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Professional Dart Players Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016-17 Premier League results

The article 2016-17 Premier League results has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

These articles are not notable per consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. Just list of stats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qed237 (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Great Things (single), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page On (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016–17 Premier League

I wasn't aware I was being rude. Apologies. Nevertheless, consensus at WT:FOOTY has always maintained that "positions by round" tables are fairly spurious when teams don't always play matches at the same time or even in the same week sometimes. – Pee Jay 20:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2016-17 Premier League results for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016-17 Premier League results is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016-17 Premier League results until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qed237 (talk) 16:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Drinkdrinker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Station usage source

Please note station usage is sourced as part of the template "* Annual estimated passenger usage based on sales of tickets in stated financial year(s) which end or originate at xxx from Office of Rail and Road statistics. Methodology may vary year on year." JaJaWa |say hello 23:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 FIFA Confederations Cup. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 18:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hey Hey Hey (Echobelly song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hey Hey Hey (Echobelly song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zaenon (talk | contribs | CentralAuth) 18:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Drinkdrinker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drinkdrinker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drinkdrinker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Rawling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Nicholson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geert De Vos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Thornton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Onorem (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 14:05, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have multiple accounts. I am protesting the actions taken by people such as you to ruin darts pages on Wikipedia, and for the way you have treated editors of these articles Drinkdrinker (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I have ever edited any article about darts, so I'm not sure what your issue is with me. You seem to be saying you are acting on behalf of or in support of blocked users. That's called meat puppetry and is treated the same as sock puppetry. Even if this isn't meat puppetry, your "protest" was inappropriate as there are proper channels to air your grievances with other users or how other users have been treated. You may make an unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it’s a joke how you and other users have treated darts articles, suddenly deciding that they are no longer valid. You could put that they are a stub or that they need addition citations, that wouldn’t be an issue but I don’t see the benefit of deleting these articles. The reason why you are one of the people I have targeted is because I can see you had involvement in blocking James, one of my friends who I know personally, and I think it is a joke how you’ve treated him considering how helpful he has clearly been to Wikipedia over the years Drinkdrinker (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't decided anything is or is not valid. I know nothing about any disputes related to articles about darts. What I do know is that there are proper ways to address disputes and grievances with how those disputes are handled- and vandalizing the user talk pages of people involved is not one. You also have made it clearer with this comment that you have engaged in meat puppetry. You may either request unblock, or not.

Without knowing any examples of what you are referring to, I can say if an article is deleted, it is because there was a discussion that reached a consensus to do so, or it met the speedy deletion criteria. There are ways to challenge the result of both methods. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drinkdrinker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m not a sockpuppet Drinkdrinker (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC) Drinkdrinker (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. Yamla (talk) 21:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed the formatting for you, your initial statement should replace the words "your reason here", as I did for you. You aren't a sockpuppet, you are a meat puppet. 331dot (talk) 18:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And therefore I shouldn’t be blocked as a sockpuppet

Unfortunately there is not a "meat puppet" template. Meat puppetry is considered a form of sock puppetry. You are also blocked for your disruptive activities. 331dot (talk) 19:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drinkdrinker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You’re all bullies, you didn’t even issue me a warming just straight up blocked meDrinkdrinker (talk) 22:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't a sincere request to be unblocked. The block will remain. If you persist in using your talk page in such abusive ways, your block will be modified to prevent you from editing your talk page. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don’t see how I’ve been abusive to you snowflakes. Anyway let’s make a deal. You lot restore the European tour darts pages that shouldn’t have been removed in the first place, and I won’t blank your pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drinkdrinker (talk • contribs)

The only "deal" here is that you will comply with policy or you won't be editing here. If you want to continue to vandalize the project, there's really no way forward for you here. Threatening us with blanking pages isn't much of a threat, and it certainly won't motivate us to allow someone to edit outside of policy. There might be other sites out there on the web that will capitulate to your threats, but this isn't one of them. Sorry. Obviously you've been blocked from editing this page, so I don't expect a response. But, if you create another sockpuppet account and continue this sort of behavior in the future, you can expect a similar outcome. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Favonian (talk) 07:21, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #74937

is closed. Although they were constructive in the past, the harassment and atrociousness that led to the loss of talk page access gives me pause. I told them "standard offer." I guess that would be Oct. 8, 2023. YMMV. If anyone feels like unblocking sooner, I'd be fine with that, but I think it's too soon to believe this editor is ready to return. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Snowflakes? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #91703

I am accepting this appeal after discussion with the blocking admin. We've now got some distance to your disruption and use of emotional language in previous appeals. I'm hoping you have learned from the past and will not repeat the behavior again. Good luck. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 11:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]