User talk:Drajay1976

Archives

Archive 1

If I have left a message on your talk page, you can reply there. It will be on my watch list and I will get back to you as soon as possible.

pov

you wanted to write all about the humanitarian aid, drajay, heres a map I saw on twitter. good int it? you are fighting for your side all right aren't you? Wikipedia is meant to present RS and not just putinist pov all the time, remember doctor. what a month of humanitarian aid has done - Sayerslle (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sayerslle, you are completely misunderstanding my deeds (and words even).

I first made the change over which you are indulging in edit war with the following summary "The citations do not warrant the therm "heavy". The second inline citation after the sentence only describes a "crushing" defeat only in Ilovaysk. This cannot be taken as a heavy defeat for Ukrainian armed forces in the overall battle" The reason for the edit was that the inline citations did not use the word "heavy". So I thought it did not belong there. You reverted it with some statement about "here we go, - its important here because as hilsums report showed and she said, this was crushing decisive, explained by Russian intervention -)"
I am okay with the word "heavy" if indeed the hilsmum report says so. So I reverted your edit with this comment. ""heavy" was deleted based on two citations after this sentence. If "hilsum report" says it was "heavy", include that as a citation before reinserting". It means that put the "hilsum reference" after this text also. But it seems you did not understand what I said. You reverted it again with the summary "have been heavily defeated' is from hilsums report - please stop your pro- kremlin 'nuances'".
It dawned on me then only that you may not know how to use the same inline citations at two places. So I made a more clear summary "Please put <ref name ="hilsum"> or something appropriate before that ref text, and paste <ref name ="hilsum"/> after the current sentence b4 reverting" and reverted the still unreferenced statement "heavy defeat".
You reverted it again!!! Cant you put a citation where it is needed? The same citation can be used at two different places. Put that citation here please. Edit summary statement that this is referenced from some source is not enough. Put the "hilsum ref" after the statement you are repeatedly reverting PLEASE. --Drajay1976 (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

did you try watching the report where you will hear, with your ears, the words. Sayerslle (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sayerslle, no, I did not. I don't watch videos generally, I only read the links as videos take up too much of my bandwidth. But dont be emotional here. You can write wikipedia in accordance with the rules and policies that we have here. You can use the word "heavy" if that reference supports it, BUT PUT THAT REFERENCE AS INLINE SOURCE OF THE WORD "HEAVY". I will believe you if you say that the link contains the statement as I wont check video links. I am not reverting you to push a POV, but to ensure that statements which are likely to be challenged have inline citations. This is wikipedia policy. Citations should be there in the article, not in edit summaries. and please assume WP:GOODFAITH. If you cant assume good faith, please WP:Don't assume that there is bad faith. --Drajay1976 (talk) 12:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar

Hello, Drajay1976,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, TheLongTone (talk) 13:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PTI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Experience

Mar4d has more experience than you in editing. Your account is old but you have less experience than him.

Are you aware of every sub-policies covered under WP:NPOV, WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, WP:WORDS, WP:CHERRYPICKING, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:UNDUE, WP:SYNTH, WP:OWNBEHAVIOR, WP:DISRUPTSIGNS, WP:EXTRAORDINARY, WP:ONUS, WP:BURDEN, WP:COATRACK etc.?

Mar4d is Civil POV pusher and SheriffIsInTown is gradually becoming tendentious editor.

You have less than 1500 edits on English Wikipedia. Mar4d has crossed 60,000 and SheriffIsIntown has crossed 9000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Space Captain (talk • contribs) 14:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have less experience in En.Wiki, but I have more than 30,000 edits in all wiki projects combined. I am not very active in en.wiki and in wiki projects in general these days, but I am an administrator in ml.wiki and I have working knowledge in the policies you mentioned above. --Drajay1976 (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But I dont have enough time!!! That is the only problem. :-/ --Drajay1976 (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IANS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Drajay1976. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of All Kerala Blood Donors Association

The article All Kerala Blood Donors Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable company. fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Drajay1976. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drajay1976. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drajay1976. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HolyHellMemoir.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HolyHellMemoir.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rajith Kumar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4073:387:9369:6D72:531F:B47F:6230 (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in and sign when you make comments on user pages as it enables others to reply to your comments. I did not add commentary, my own point of view, or my own personal analysis to any article. I strongly suspect that you are not logging in to mask the fact that you have already added your own commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis etc to the article in question and are trying to prevent me from making the article neutral and ensuring that it conforms to the formal tone expected in a wikipedia. For further conversation, please log in. Thank you. --Drajay1976 (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Kerala gold smuggling case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Outlook. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A for Apple

The article A for Apple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only 1 review found, fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have added another Malayalam language review and removed the tag. --Drajay1976 (talk) 18:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Varthamanam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varthamanam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varthamanam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VarthamanamPoster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VarthamanamPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dileep~~, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary~~. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 18:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC) (Stricken off no reason part 18:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Please note that content is according to Wikipedia policies, not Indian laws. If multiple reliable sources mention the name of the victims of a crime, it can be included per WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:DUE and WP:BLPCRIME. Please read thru these policies. Thanks! — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 18:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DaxServer, so, the problem in your opinion was the reason was not valid (as per the same policies you cited, I think the removal was valid). I will try the removal again with more specific reasoning. In this case, all the news articles used as referece to support the statement that Dileep was arrested and interrogated for the kidnap of the actress do not mention the name of Dileep as these sources follow Indian law. The contention that Dileep was interrogated in connection with the abduction of this particular actress is missing from all the sources. So, it is WP:OR. Thanks. --Drajay1976 (talk) 05:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, the terms of use puts the responsibility on the users to follow the law of the land.. Wikipedia doesn't claim to be above any law! Section 228A of the Indian penal code provides for 2 year imprisonment to anyone who makes the name of a sexual assault victim public. Please follow the terms of use... Drajay1976 (talk) 10:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is relation to your edit [1] removing sourced info. Please note that content on Wikipedia is governed by Wikipedia policies (WP:BLP and WP:BLPCRIME in particular in this case). This was already explained to you in the above section. Please read thru:

Thanks! — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 10:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise. You're right. The sources cited do mention Bhavana. It might come under WP:OR. I've self-reverted. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 11:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert. I would also like to point out that wikipedia doesn't claim to be above the laws of the countries where it operates. It also puts the onus on the users to follow the law. Please see the terms of use clause 1b

You are responsible for your own actions: You are legally responsible for your edits and contributions on Wikimedia Projects, so for your own protection you should exercise caution and avoid contributing any content that may result in criminal or civil liability under any applicable laws. For clarity, applicable law includes at least the laws of the United States of America. Although we may not agree with such actions, we warn editors and contributors that authorities may seek to apply other country laws to you, including local laws where you live or where you view or edit content. WMF generally cannot offer any protection, guarantee, immunity or indemnification.

--Drajay1976 (talk) 12:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DaxServer I would also like to point out that making the name of a victim of sexual assault public is a crime in India and it carries maximum punishment for a term of 2 years and fine as per the Indian Penal Code Section 228A --Drajay1976 (talk) 12:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adarsh Sukumaran moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Adarsh Sukumaran, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adarsh Sukumaran (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adarsh Sukumaran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Drajay1976! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shyam Mohan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shyam Mohan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyam Mohan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 07:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anirudh Pavithran moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anirudh Pavithran, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why you allege WP:UPE or WP:COI!!! Can you elaborate? --Drajay1976 (talk) 04:34, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anirudh Pavithran (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anirudh Pavithran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:28, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Masquerade (2023 web series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Masquerade (2023 web series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adarsh Sukumaran

Hello, Drajay1976. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adarsh Sukumaran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Masquerade (2023 web series) (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Masquerade (2023 web series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anirudh Pavithran

Hello, Drajay1976. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anirudh Pavithran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kollavarsham 1975 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kollavarsham 1975 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kollavarsham 1975 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Doom Patrol (talk) 09:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kollavarsham-1975.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kollavarsham-1975.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anirudh Pavithran

Hello, Drajay1976. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Anirudh Pavithran".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Masquerade (2023 web series)

Hello, Drajay1976. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Masquerade (2023 web series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Masquerade (2023 web series)

Hello, Drajay1976. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Masquerade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]