User talk:Dragonlover21

Welcome!

Hi Dragonlover21! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 04:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm glad the people here are so friendly! Dragonlover21 (talk) 12:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines you may find useful

^{(Part of a larger guide I wrote covering a variety of topics new users face)}

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary.
We have a tutorial, The Wikipedia Adventure, if you would like to learn more about editing Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a general discussion forum, additions to talk pages should be about improving the article within the guidelines, not voicing one's opinion on the subject matter.
"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
User-generated sources (such as blogs, social media profiles, self-published books, or pay-to-print books) are generally not reliable sources. The only exception is when an already notable subject makes a claim about themselves that is not countered or doubted by independent sources.
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.

Ian.thomson (talk) 21:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Ian.thomson, and sorry. Dragonlover21 (talk) 22:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dragonlover21! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Barnstar, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, talk pages are not general discussion forums

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Cadbury Eclairs for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Kookie Cookie Knows What's Best (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify. Dragonlover21 (talk) 00:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonlover21, I hope you liked the userbox that I made at the request for the userboxes. 3125A^Talk!_Edits! 18:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Smiles warmly* Thanks.

Dragonlover21 (talk) 14:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please tell me how to put it on my user page? Thanks, Dragonlover21 (talk) 14:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonlover21, I will put it on for you since very sadly, you are blocked. {{31}}{{25A (talk)}} 18:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@3125A:, don't edit on behalf of blocked users please. See WP:PROXYING.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How strange...

Why can't I edit my own user page? Dragonlover21 (talk) 15:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because you are blocked? Theroadislong (talk) 16:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But on my *ahem* previous blocked accounts, I was still able to edit my own user page. Could someone please help me? Maaaaybe by creating the page for me? *bats eyelids* Dragonlover21 (talk) 00:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if that's possible but I know that people can edit other people's pages, so maybe... Dragonlover21 (talk) 00:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal is available via WP:UTRS through your master account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hchdyddtxtd 49.189.208.105 (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]