User talk:DonCalo/Archive 2011

Re:Castor

Hi, Don. Well, I don't know why but that source is wrong. Castor died on April. All the sources say he died 11 April: [1] ("morreu no Rio de Janeiro aproximadamente às 18 horas e 30 minutos da sexta-feira 11" Issue is from April 16 and if you get a calendar for the year 1997 you see April 11 is Friday, not March 11) [2] ("11/04/97") [3] ("bicheiro Castor de Andrade, vítima de um enfarte em 11 de abril de 1997.") Best regards. Idontknow 610^TM 18:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I removed that ref from there and added another ref that confirms he died on April 11. And "Castor, homem educado, risonho e popular, era poderoso de fato, mas - à semelhança dos demais - tinha como anteparo Kalil Petrus Kalil, o Turcão, este sim o maior banqueiro de descarga do Rio de Janeiro: discreto, respeitado entre os pares e conhecido pela severidade e eficiência nas ações sob seu comando." Translates to "Castor, a popular, cheerful, and educated man, was in fact powerful, but - like the others - had as his shield Kalil Petrus Kalil, known as Turcao, the biggest 'discharge banker' of Rio de Janeiro: discreet, respected among the pairs and known for the severity and efficiency in the actions under his command." Hope this helps, Idontknow 610^TM 19:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Giulio

Ciao! My recent Giulio Andreotti expansion has been tagged for poor prose. Can you help to cleanup the article? Thanks and good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 20:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Turcao.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Turcao.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Turcao

WOW, that is very messed up. How did you even get into this? Anyways I'll see what I can do, but I don't want to get very involved if this gets out of control. Best regards, Idontknow 610^TM 20:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

note - BLPN - Vito Roberto Palazzolo

Hi, a thread has been opened at the BLP noticeboard regarding a an article you have been involved in editing. Please respond there, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 21:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fasci Siciliani

The article Fasci Siciliani you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Fasci Siciliani for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation of a living person

Almost everything you say in your Wiki page on Palazzolo is slanted and fortifies the litany of newspaper driven and unsubstantiated claims made against him. This stuff is unverified nonsense and very harmful. All you ever do is make it worse, using Wikipedia. There is no question, therefore, of putting my comments at the bottom. You have to stop slandering this man. It is very hard to work out your motives. Is it simply that you don't care if your facts and allegations are substantiated?

He has only ever been finally sentenced for one thing, which was in Switzerland in 1985, and that was a very doubtful conviction. They knew he was innocent but, under pressure from the States, they shoehorned his case into a conviction that he should have known the money he returned ($6m) might have gone into the drug trade. THAT WAS IT.

After which the machine began rolling against him, perhaps driven by the Swiss banking establishment, who wanted to use him as a Scapegoat and have him extradited to Italy, so that they could be clean of him. Or from the Mafia itself who find it useful to have a target. Or both. The newspapers couldn't care less, as long as it makes news.

You, Don Calo, are party to this terrible nonsense that Palazzolo can only reply to in court, which takes years, by which time there is more rubbish for him to answer. So it never stops. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fircks (talk • contribs) 11:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, press reports of mainstream media with a record of fact checking are considered reliable sources in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Verifiability. He was convicted twice, in Switzerland and Italy, while going to the highest courts. - DonCalo (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moro

Ciao! Are you interested in the Moro affair? I just wrote a huge article, maybe it needs help as my English is mediocre... Ciao and good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 20:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Gotti

You know much about the American Mafia?

I ask because there's another John Gotti biopic in the works, and I'm interested in trying to get his article fixed up in time to be TFA when it's released. The casting hasn't been finalized yet, so there's plenty of time.

I've got two books I'm working with to complete and cite everything (Gotti: Rise and Fall and Mafia Dynasty), but I'm wondering if there's anyone else who could help or provide references from some more sources. I thought I would ask you because you seem to have written the only good Mafia article we have. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 22:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mauro De Mauro

The article Mauro De Mauro you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mauro De Mauro for eventual comments about the article. Well done! AGK [•] 22:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Awarded to Don Calo for his impressive work contributing to Italian organized crime related articles. Congratulazioni! Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 11:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Links and copyright

Hello. I have removed the link again from Vito Roberto Palazzolo. Before it is restored, we need to address the copyright concerns. Our copyright policy prohibits linking to websites that use content from others without proper license. See WP:LINKVIO and WP:ELNEVER. We cannot link to a website that is using material from another source when there is not sound reason to believe that the source has licensed it for their display. ANSA has its own website; it would, of course, be completely appropriate to link to the article if displayed there: [4]. Alternatively, any other reliable source to support that information that does not attribute content to another party may be appropriate, but we should not restore this link unless we are able to establish that Antimafia Duemila utilizes content with proper license. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The retard is back again

Hi, i'm 100% certain that this retard is back again tagging images for deletion under a Commons account User:Hold and wave. The idiot is on a rampage adding deletion tags to Italian organized crime and Israel-related articles. Just thought you should know, in case you do not already. I will refrain from requesting a sockpuppet investigation myself. It's been four years dealing with this fool. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 16:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Falcone-Borsellino.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Falcone-Borsellino.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Duisburg massacre.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Duisburg massacre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rotolo arrest.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rotolo arrest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Messina Denaro Espresso.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Messina Denaro Espresso.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Michele Pantaleone.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Michele Pantaleone.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have a little patience in the future. I barely had the time to put the proper license tag. - DonCalo (talk) 18:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzolo

I have proposed a solution to our Palazzolo problems at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Vito_Roberto_Palazzolo_new_section

I hope we can resolve the issues — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fircks (talk • contribs) 16:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for File:FilipAndTal.jpg

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:FilipAndTal.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. damiens.rf 20:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commisso 'ndrina

Let's discuss this at the talk page, shall we? Giant Snowman 21:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Early Italian-American groups

I know you're mainly working on Italian organized crime, but I wonder if you might have knowledge or access to sources on the characters and organizations of the early Italian-American groups (mainly the Sicilians). I've been working on the Morello crime family and its members, but it's difficult to pin down the history without full access to good sources. In case there is an overlap in your concededly wide grasp of this field, would you consider reviewing some of the articles on the early Sicilian groups? Unfortunately the coverage of the American Mafia is clearly substandard compared to the articles on its Italian progenitors. Shoplifter (talk) 08:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your assessment of articles on the American Mafia, and admire your courage to take this on. Sure, I am willing to ccooperate where I can, but it is not really my field of expertise. Good sources are Critchley, which is a serious attempt to trace the history. Another good source is Salvatore Lupo. His history of the Mafia is translated in English and is accesible on Amazon if you have an account (and is definitly worth buying). Lupo also wrote a book on the migration of the Mafia to North America, Quando la mafia trovò l'America. Storia di un intreccio intercontinentale, 1888-2008, (Torino, Einaudi, 2008), but is only available in Italian as far as I know. It is on Google books but not fully accessible unfortunately. Anyway, let me know if you need any help. - DonCalo (talk) 14:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words; I can't really take any credit yet because my efforts thus far have been rather cursory. :-) But it would be nice to see an improvement in this area. I'm hoping that the templates me and Vic49 have been working on will attract some new knowledgeable editors. By the way, it's wonderful to see someone who consistently uses primary (and presumably more adequate) sources in a language other than English. I wish we could have more of that on WP. Shoplifter (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Rizzuto

Last time a checked, only providing bare links isn't a acceptable reason to remove text. --Ted87 (talk) 18:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Omerta

What was wrong with this addition i made to the Popular culture section of this page: Omertà:

'Omerta' is a song by heavy metal band Lamb of God, released in their 2004 album Ashes of the Wake. The song begins with frontman Randy Blythe saying:

Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded man shall say to his assailant, "If I Live, I will kill you.If I Die, You are forgiven. " Such is the Rule of Honor.

It's relevant as the song is about Omerta, in every way... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.47.9 (talk) 11:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Vito Roberto Palazzolo". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by November 20, 2011.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 19:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation accepted

The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Vito Roberto Palazzolo, in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Vito Roberto Palazzolo, so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.

As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 20:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraser Cain

Hi DonCalo. Would you reconsider your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraser Cain? I don't see any evidence of vanity or self-promotion. To ensure that the closing admin will not discount your comment, would you include an analysis of how the article passes or fails WP:GNG? A good way to do this is to analyze the sources in the article or to demonstrate that you searched for sources but could not find any. Best, Cunard (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Emma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Emma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Emma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Vic49 (talk) 16:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sicilian Mafiosi by city

Hi, the above article seems to have come under an unsourced editing blitz. I don't know enough about the subject to say if the edits are correct or not. Can you check? Thanks Denisarona (talk) 16:32, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Vito Roberto Palazzolo

Dear DonCalo: My name is Tristessa de St Ange, your Mediation Commitee mediator. I'd like to invite you to participate in the current stage of the following case:

Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Vito Roberto Palazzolo

Many thanks, and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Yours, --Tristessa (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caiyad Phahad

Would you reply to my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caiyad Phahad regarding userfication? Thank you, Cunard (talk) 06:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you reply at the AfD regarding the GFDL-violating, WP:FAKEARTICLE-violating copy-and-paste of the article to User:Phoenix B 1of3/Caiyad Phahad? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aparo afd

I have a question because in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvatore Aparo the vote was three delete(s), and two redirect(s) then it was re-listed. Can an administrator re-list an afd, and then vote in the same afd. --Vic49 (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles Ubriaco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Ubriaco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Ubriaco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Vic49 (talk) 20:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not bite

Re your remark "It also should be seriously edited by a someone with a sufficient level of English, otherwise it might as well be deleted for WP:NONSENSE": this is seriously uncalled for and (completely unnecessarily) insulting and demoralizing. Please do not bite the newcomers; Wikipedia needs editors. --Lambiam 20:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello DonCalo/Archive 2011! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Vito Roberto Palazzolo

I was reassigned the case, I will take a look at where things are at and try to get up to speed before the end of the weekend. Thanks for your patience. --WGFinley (talk) 06:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William Devino

William Devino another mobster from the Goodfellas movie is up for deletion. --Vic49 (talk) 16:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzolo

I've added my take on getting discussions restarted, you can check it out here], thanks!

--WGFinley (talk) 01:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 18:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year![reply]

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.