User talk:Dlwv

Welcome!

The Assay Depot article is no longer paid content! It is an informational page about a biotech company in San Diego. I will review it again and remove anything that smacks of promotion.

DeeAnn Visk, San Diego science writer 23:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Dlwv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gryllida 12:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assay Depot

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am a budding science writer in the San Diego area, a hot bed of small start-up companies. As I am working on building my reputation in this area (and to attract attention of potential employers) I would like to make some company pages. I am concerned about conflict of interest (I may actually get paid to write for a few of them, others would be unpaid volunteer work to build my reputation.) As a PhD research scientist, I have some understanding about conflict of interest in the realm of publishing peer-reviewed papers. I am a newbie (LOVE the do not bite the newbie section) at this and would love your advice. I enjoy Wikipedia and have made some completely unpaid, unbiased contributions in the past. But this is a new realm for me, making new pages for a company, attempting to do it in an unbiased fashion.

Perhaps having someone look over pages before I post or submit them? Or freely disclose my conflict of interest ahead of time?

Trying to do the right thing...

--DeeAnn Visk &#124 San Diego science writer (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely disclose your conflict of interest ahead of time. What I would do is create your pages through articles for creation. The advantage of this is that someone else will definitely look at your article and review it. If it's neutral, they'll move it to article space. This is a way to almost guarantee that your pages will be neutral. Hope this helps.

It's a Fox! (What did I break) 17:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Okay, I am submitting my first article creation, and yes, I am being paid to do it. I really do not want to lose my good standing with Wikipedia, so if the article on Assay Depot is deemed un-neutral I will understand. Is there someone out there who could read it over (it is in my Sandbox) and give their opinion on it? Or should I just pray and hit the submit button?

Thank you so much for all your help.

Long live Wikipedia!

DeeAnn Visk, San Diego science writer 04:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

AfC is a queue and interactive help, like what {{helpme}} is used for, is almost not possible. As a word of advice on the article, you may find Help:Links#External_links (the bit about link title displayed rather than raw URL) and {{cite web}} useful to format your references. I feel that it is pertinent to close this query at the time being; please feel free to open a new one when you require further assistance. (I have also added section headings and a standard welcome message to facilitate readability on this page.) Gryllida 12:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: to nominate the existing sandbox for review at Articles for Creation, add the code {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft or sandbox page. Gryllida 12:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Thank you for being open about paid editing: the guideline you should read is the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. You are also correct to use WP:Articles for creation rather then submitting articles directly.

A useful way to provide a link to another page is to place its title between double square brackets, so to link to your sandbox page write [[User:Dlwv/sandbox]] which produces User:Dlwv/sandbox.

I do not have time to check your article in detail, but at a quick look the general tone is too promotional. I see words like "This unique approach", "a noted board of directors", "a thought leader", "played a key role"... Read WP:PEACOCK. Remember that Wikipedia is not a place for companies (or people) to "tell the world" about themselves, and is very resistant to being used like that - that is one reason why COI editing is discouraged. A Wikipedia article should not be the story the company wants to tell about itself, but an impartial view of it, from outside. The reader should not be able to guess the writer's opinion.

There is good general advice at WP:Your first article and WP:Writing better articles. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have read through the article and added feedback inline, which you may want to read through and remove my pieces along your way through fixing them if you like. Gryllida 12:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Assay Depot

Hello, Dlwv. The above article is getting near the top of the review list. I notice that there seems to be a lot of duplication in the article. You may have accidentally made an extra copy of sections. Can you please look it over an delete any text that's not needed? Thanks. —Anne Delong (talk) 23:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assay Depot (October 17)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Assay Depot.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Have a nice day! Darylgolden (talk) 04:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dlwv, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Assay Depot concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Assay Depot, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Assay Depot

Hello Dlwv. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Assay Depot".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Assay Depot}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assay Depot (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Assay Depot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assay Depot (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Assay Depot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Assay Depot concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Assay Depot, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Assay Depot

Hello, Dlwv. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Assay Depot".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]