User talk:Dlh-stablelights

Just wanted to stay hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I have a lot of the veterinary pages on my watchlist, so I've seen the work you are doing. Thanks for expanding the equine disease pages, and let me know if you have any questions or need anything. --Joelmills 23:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Emasculators.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Emasculators.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Just a quick thank you for your good work on the gelding article. It has helped transform the article from a disaster to something that is useful and well-sourced. Great work. (p.s. should we try nominating it for Good Article status? Discuss on article talk page if you want). Montanabw 05:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An unrelated question

I see from your user page that you are a horse vet. Could you swing by the cerebellar abiotrophy article and then let me know on my talk page if you have any direct or indirect experience dealing with Arabian horses in the UK that have this condition? I'm looking for cases, past or present. Montanabw 19:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would be delighted if you would ask around. and Yes, I know, I was the primary editor on the article. I own a horse with the condition. And yes, almost any "Wobbler," if an Arabian, is probably actually a CA case. Probably the most "for sure" symptom is the head tremor, they are like a person with Parkinson's disease. From the literature, apparently not all cases manifest the tremor, but when they DO have it, you can be almost certain you have CA. Also, the ataxia is bilateral, no one-sidedness. Wobbler's often is seen more in the back end, CA horses are more likely to have problems with the front end or with all four feet. Rearing up, losing their balance and falling over is a real common thing, and in addition to being diagnosed as wobblers, often these horses are diagnosed instead as having had brain damage from a concussion after an accident, when the accident itself was probably due to CA.

Few people will drop the $3K or so on the radiographs and myelograms necessary to definitively diagnose true wobbler's or EVM, or any of the other spinal cord things, and with Arabs, it isn't what they are going to find--it's not the spine, it's the cerebellum. Arabs rarely if ever get true Wobbler's, though if you want to skim the genetic diseases section of Arabian horse there is a thing called OAAM that involves the occipital joint, C1 and C2, but it manifests in foals and is definitively diagnosed with X-Rays (and the reearch done on it is about zip). CA, however, is probably far more widespread than anyone realizes, and because it is badly underdiagnosed, researchers are having a tough time getting DNA, especially when the best case scenario are horses who are not only ataxic, but with diagnosis verified post mortem by histopathology of the cerebellum to find the atrophied purkinje cells. The reason it's a concern is that some horses with mild cases can be bred (particularly mares), and in such cases, ALL their foals will be carriers, at the least. And yes, it definitely IS in certain bloodlines, but best not to discuss details on a public board, I can be reached by the email feature if you want to chat further on that.

Sorry, I know I'm going on and on about this. It's personal. I want them to find the gene and develop a DNA test, but the shortage of necessary samples is a big problem. So is the denial on the part of breeders, but, no surprise there. (grin) You'll note in the bibliography an article out of the UK, (I think the journal was In Practice, it's an online pdf) so there is some knowledge of it at some of the Universities n the UK. And you guys are a whole lot closer to Switzerland than I am. The Americans at UC Davis are doing some research, but mostly sitting on their ass, they make more money finding color genes so people can deliberately breed for pretty colors...sigh. The Swiss, if they can get DNA, are in a position to move a lot faster on this. Montanabw 00:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Equine medicine articles

As I go through assessing the veterinary medicine articles, I find it difficult at times to correctly rate the importance of articles whose subject I am not too familiar with (or more likely, was familiar with ten years ago but have mostly forgotten). So if you could doublecheck my ratings on the equine articles as I assess them, I would appreciate it. If you're interested, there is a rough guide to importance ratings at Wikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicine/Assessment. I'll leave this message over at Eventer's and Montanabw's talk pages also, since I think of you three as the horse guys. --Joelmills 01:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dlh, left a few snippy comments along the way in my assorted edits. Didn't mean to sound so snippy, just was tired and grumpy. You are doing GREAT work and it is appreciated here. Want another task? Fact check horse anatomy. Been some good work going on over there, but none of us are vets. Montanabw 06:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Equine Exertional Rhabdomyolysis

Is this the same as Equine polysaccharide storage myopathy, or is one a subset of the other? Neither article makes any mention of the other, so I guess they are duplicating information and should be merged. Before I added merge tags I wanted to check with you and Montanabw, as I am not too familiar with these conditions. --Joelmills 18:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kelso's

hi! umm.. you said leave you a message.. what's wrong w/ the new page I made? CloversMallRat 08:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC) _____________________________________________________________________________[reply]

On Leon Rodriguez Ichaso and El Super and Orlando Jimenes Leal

The famous Cuban-Americans page. I don't know how to link or add things properly and I thought that a link to the IMDb would be sufficient. So sorry -- as I meant well. Mig 22:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Can I remove what you said on my talk page?

May I?

Please, feel free to remove it. And thank you very much! Mig 04:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Gelding GA --arrgh

We got nailed by a 20 year old kid on this one, I think. I think that about half of what he said may be partially well taken (that we need a little better intro and more history), but the rest was a rant. I think a few tweaks and tuneups and we should try again. If you find anything to add, go for it. I think the NPOV slap was uncalled for. Montanabw^(talk) 17:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this? But I still think you can just fill a section with a discussion of why so many groups support the practice:

Ethical issues regarding pain in animals
Alexander Livingston, BVetMed, PhD
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
July 15, 2002, Vol. 221, No. 2, Pages 229-233
Ling.Nut 01:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you figure out this? It's over my head...Montanabw^(talk) 07:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Please read p. 433 of this. The bit about "...months or even years" seems to be coming from the hydrocele section, not the funicuilitis ("scirrhous cord") section. Also some of the complications seem to have been omitted (hydrocele, continued masculine behavior, etc.) , but maybe that's not important. I'm not a veterinarian. :-) Ling.Nut 00:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help on skeleton diagram

Man do I hate to rain on the parade of an attractive image, but Have you looked CLOSELY at that skeleton diagram Image:Horseanatomy.png Image:Horseanatomy.png? I noticed that it has some SERIOUS inaccuracies (like mislabeling the sacrum as part of the lumbar and coccygeal vertebrae and saying that the horse has a collar bone when it doesn't!) It needs some relabeling and fixing. It's almost so bad we should consider removing it if we can't fix it, which is a real bummer because it's so clear... YIKES!!!! A couple examples that are more correct: http://www.horseracinghistory.co.uk/hrho/images/education/horse_skeleton.gif and http://www.classicbloodstock.com.au/skillsEDIT/clientuploads/39/horseskeleton.jpg Wish I could find something better. Worse yet, they are putting it up as a featured image! Montanabw^(talk) 05:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New project

Not sure if you are into work on the riding articles, but Per the discussion at the jumping position article, I made a sandbox off from my user page to maybe create a whole new article on riding techniques in general. It's here: User:Montanabw/Sandbox. Dive in and help, or discuss, or whatever. Montanabw^(talk) 19:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, who addded Leon Ichaso on the "famous cuban-Americans" list? It wasn't I -- I saw the name after the addition had been made by someone else and then I added him? Where do these additions come from?Mig 14:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Invite to WikiProject Equine

This is the official word: WikiProject Equine was quietly created by someone while the rest of us were endlessly discussing a WikiProject Horse. We have an official project! So let's go with it, and I am officially inviting you to formally join! Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Equine, add your name to the list and see what you can contribute. If you haven't already joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Horse breeds or one of the other "child" or "affiliated" wikiprojects at WikiProject Equine, please feel free to do so. Just trying to tag articles with the new templates has awakened me to the fact that there are over 1000 equine articles in Wikipedia! (My watchlist alone is now at something like 700+) There's much to do and plenty for everyone! Thanks! Montanabw^(talk) 09:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CAM topics in veterinary medicine

Hi There, I have recently been involved in editing the Veterinary chiropracticarticle and I would love to have your input on this topic. 'Adjusting' horses is discussed there. --—CynRN ^(Talk) 18:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small-Aesclapius Vet.jpg.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Small-Aesclapius Vet.jpg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reactivation of WikiProject Veterinary Medicine

One other user and I are currently interested in re-activating this project. Please stop by and express your interest here and make suggestions about how we can generate more interest in the project and its articles. --Kleopatra (talk) 01:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Dlh-stablelights! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

File:Image-Aesclapius Vet.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Image-Aesclapius Vet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Dlh-stablelights,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EmasculatorsPhoto.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EmasculatorsPhoto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]