User talk:Dilshad002

Welcome!

Hello, Dilshad002, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Poolanthara, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DMacks (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poolanthara

The article Poolanthara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and I can't find Google-hits to verify it either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dilshad.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Dilshad.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 19:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Dilshad A, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 18:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Dilshad.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dilshad.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only warning

Please stop hijacking pages to support different content. Any further such activity will result in you being blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 08:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing, repeatedly moving pages and then hijacking them to different subjects. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 12:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dj Anas Anu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dj Anas Anu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj Anas Anu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i add more reference link.. plz check the links.. and remove nomination of deletion

Speedy deletion nomination of Actress Disha Dinakar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Actress Disha Dinakar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New message from JalenFolf

Hello, Dilshad002. You have new messages at JalenFolf's talk page.
Message added 14:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jalen D. Folf (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dilshad002, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Largoplazo (talk) 23:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppetry Asnavava is my friend. I tell her to help me to soutout this recent edit issue.. So she talk to Largoplazo about the recent edit

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dilshad002. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dilshad002. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc: Hai,Recently someone edited some article and i got sockpuppetry Block..can u please recheck everything and please unblock my id Dilshad002 (talk) 09:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc: @JalenFolf: Could I know why my account was blocked. I have no connection with the other accountDilshad002 (talk) 09:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is more information available at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dilshad002/Archive which gives the evidence as to why you were blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc: Yes, your right that was happened in September... When my account got blocked i try to defend with my another account.. that time i didn't know that using multiple account is violation in Wikipedia.. You can clearly see that JalenFolf is mention onWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dilshad002/Archive that i use account for defend my case...But Recently someone edited that article and i got sockpuppetry Block.. i kindly requesting to unblock my account Dilshad002 (talk) 12:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And Nithinmohanmg is also you? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc: No,it was not meeh Dilshad002 (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the similarity of editing between the accounts and that both your account and Nithinmohanmg have been interested in the same topics I am still of the belief that you were operating that account as well. You are able to use the unblock instructions in the template above to have another administrator review an appeal. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilshad002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The other account is not my. Anyone can edit that same topic. Please remove the block Dilshad002 (talk) 06:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui: previously.. i got sockpuppetry block.. That time i didn't know that using multiple account is violation in Wikipedia..You can clearly see that JalenFolf is mention onWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dilshad002/Archive that i use account for defend my case..But Recently someone edited that article and i got sockpuppetry Block.. i am clearly saying that i have no connection with that account.. i believe that anyone can edit that article.

So I kindly request you to unblock my id Dilshad002 (talk) 07:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: Hi, I am eagerly waiting for your replay... Dilshad002 (talk) 09:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The checkuser data correlation between this account and Nithinmohanmg isn't quite enough to warrant a block purely on its own, but combined with the editing patterns of both accounts it makes a connection very likely. I quite simply do not believe that Nithinmohanmg is a completely unrelated account that just happens to have overwritten the Dilshad article with your preferred version entirely of their own volition. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: I didn't know how to convince you...You can check my previous block i didn't even request unblock appeal ...i am humbly requesting you that i didn't done this.. please kindly request you to unblock my account Dilshad002 (talk) 15:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: I found the reason why JalenFolf report meeh.. The article name and my Wikipedia username is almost same ...so he thinks that i am making my own article...if you read the report reason you can clearly get that Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dilshad002/Archive ...Also you can saw that so many other guys also edit that article... i am 100% sure that's the reason why he report meeh.. So kindly check the case one more time... I am eagerly waiting for your replay... Dilshad002 (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe your claims that this account is not related to Nithinmohanmg. I cannot conceive of anything you can say that would convince me; the evidence is very strong. Both accounts have made the same changes, both accounts have made those changes from the same real-world location. Kindly stop pinging me; I am not in any way likely to change my mind. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dilshad.2019.jpg

The file File:Dilshad.2019.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]