User talk:DialaSharief

June 2020

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Template:Biography, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 18:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

It seems you have a conflict of interest on Salim Assaf so I moved it to draftspace. If you have a conflict of interest you need to submit it through AfC. Eternal Shadow Talk 19:58, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me understand why my page has been deleted

Dear, You have deleted my page for "Cross-namespace redirects". All my redirects were thoroughly checked. Can you please specify which ones were incorrect?

Thank you for your time DialaSharief (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DialaSharief, the article was moved to the draftspace since you appear to have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article. You can view the article here: Draft:Salim Assaf. Sam-2727 (talk) 23:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salim Assaf (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nkon21 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salim Assaf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Salim Assaf, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 16:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DialaSharief! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 16:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Salim Assaf

Hello, DialaSharief. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salim Assaf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Salim Assaf

Hello, DialaSharief. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salim Assaf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Gray (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I believe that you have a basic misunderstanding of referencing. We need references that are about Gray rather than photos taken by Gray. That he is prolific and takes beautiful pictures is wonderful, but we need to record in our own words what is said about him by others in significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of him. This disqualifies, for example the Vanity Fair flanel panel

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Gray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are asking for guidance. I am not 100% sure that you have read the decline rationale in detail. I'm happy to guide you, and want to start from the same place as you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining. so in this case, I need to submit articles as reference and not just photos. Is that it or there's other things missing? DialaSharief (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

could interviews be considered as a reliable reference source? DialaSharief (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends who is being interviewed. Wikipedia has no interest in what an article subjects says, but is hugely interested jun what is said by others about the subject. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get it now. Is there any other reason for this page to be rejected other than the reference part? your feedback is greatly appreciated. DialaSharief (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is that I cannot tell, because the content will alter as you research and find the right references. Take your time, do the research, and edit according to what the references say. Text cannto stay if it is not borne out by what is said in the references 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback. It's very helpful. I will try to find the right references online and do some research and edit the draft. DialaSharief (talk) 17:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I thought to ask you if my draft is ready for publishing? I deleted most of it including sources. Is it ready or not yet? Appreciate your feedback. DialaSharief (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Gray (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Gray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Gray (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Gray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]