User talk:Diaaeldin.elsherif

December 2011

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Diaaeldin.elsherif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

138.246.2.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: and [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppetry]] - Diaa Eldin Mohamed

Blocking administrator: JohnCD (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are not just autoblocked, you are blocked directly for sockpuppetry. Please address this in your next unblock request, from your main accounts talk page Jac16888 ^Talk 01:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Universal law, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- wj32 ^t/c 07:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Universal law ‎. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CutOffTies (talk) 15:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Universal law, you may be blocked from editing. CutOffTies (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No original research

Please read the following message. Wikipedia is about content cited from reliable sources - not your own words. Thanks.

Welcome

Hello, Diaaeldin.elsherif, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CutOffTies (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Universal law, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CutOffTies (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion and abusing multiple accounts - Diaa Eldin Mohamed (talk · contribs). If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]