User talk:Diaa Eldin Mohamed
|
Regarding your edits to Universal law
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 69.181.249.189 (talk) 08:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Since you are unrepentant in your POV pushing, you've now been reported for vandalism. 69.181.249.189 (talk) 08:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Universal law (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Universal law. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- And creating a second page to avoid having to comply with WP guidelines won't work either. 69.181.249.189 (talk) 08:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Do not remove quality control tags without discussion and without fixing the problem. That is disruptive editing and may get you blocked.Sjö (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 69.181.249.189 (talk) 09:05, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diaa_Eldin_Mohamed for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. CutOffTies (talk) 18:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)