User talk:Devika Singh

Devika Singh, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Devika Singh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Nice looking user page. I'm interested to see how you make it more Wikipedian.

Two questions (which is actually one question): should a link to my page be under references? References are for citations and should you cite my Wikipedia page?

Also, join the Teahouse!

Dr Ashton (talk) 15:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits feedback

Good edits!

Your edit to the Thor page was removed because it was unreferenced. Why don't you find a reference and restore your edit?

Dr Ashton (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3 more edits

Dear Devika,

For next Tuesday, please make 3 more edits.

Dr Ashton (talk) 19:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. 3 additional Non-Psych Edits

        1. Guyanese Creole
        2. Teacher
        3. Wakenaam

2. I went back and check my last edits. Two were still there but my edit to Thor (Marvel Comics) was removed. I believe that this was removed due to lack of referencing. I made the edit but did not reference my source of information

(Devika Singh (talk) 03:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

490 Abstratct

PSY 490 editors

the link below is what I've been working on for the Abstract. You may edit it or play around with it if you like

[Course Abstract]

Xyzbb1253 (talk) 13:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you can put in a sentence or two if you like or make changes to it too. Go ahead, add to it

Xyzbb1253 (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial & Organization Assessment Improvement Week 6 Assignment

Industrial & Organizational Assessment

First I identify the problems. The article problems are:

1) It was not cited. Not reputable sources.

2)It was not linked to other articles and other articles are not linked to it.

3) It seems like a personal reflection and lack encyclopedic description of the subject.

Some improvements I worked on:

1)I started by linking another article to the page.

2)Then I add the references.

3) Its no longer an orphan.

4) I also link the page to other articles.

5) I also try cleaning up the article a little.

So far I hope I am improving the article, I am learning as I go along. If I made any errors please feel free to make corrections and let me know.

(Devika Singh (talk) 14:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

week 6

Dear Devika,

I don't see your edits. I think that's because you were not logged into Wikipedia. So I can't tell if it was you and a bot reversed some anonymous edits. Please take a look and redo your edits while signed in.

Dr Ashton (talk) 22:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Industrial & Organizational Assessment, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Work and Surveys (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

more on week 6

I was wrong! According to the history, no one edited that page in the last two weeks! You said you added two references, did you mean links?

Dr Ashton (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I/o assessment takeover

I think we should change this article because is not a topic but more of discussion post of various subject matters. Look here for more info. Xyzbb1253 (talk) 02:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But we're just editing a page that isn't factual most of the references are linked to the I/O Psych wiki page and on the I/O psych wiki page it sates individual assessment. Individual assessment (tests) or Psychological testing is a topic in the Schultz & Schultz book (Chap. 4) and there are articles relating to that. I can't find information to edit the I/O assessment article because it isn't a topic its more of a discussion or opinionated article. Xyzbb1253 (talk) 02:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial & Organizational Assessment

Hey Team hope everyone is having a productive weekend!

Let us begin with a couple of terms we should definitely cite, "Psychological Testing" and "Work Sampling" should be cited which I have done It is one of the tools for individual assessments. I have also noticed that the article is still written in a opinionated matter. The improvements can be made but therefore we should all be more careful on certain words to be used that may prevent the article to be continued to be written in this format. Including the main definition of Industrial/Organizational Assessment the two quotes are used to define a term, lets simplify the quote paraphrase it to a solid meaning and just cite the quote. What do you think? Oplmnq3 (talk) 00:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All of us should take a section and redo it and use the information already given as research foundation....some key terms and general statements that doed not read as original thought needs to be cited sucha as assessing jobs and work (Areas of Assessment), PAQ (occupational analysis inventory. Will cite those suggested. --KierraA. (talk) 09:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, I add links so I will just work on cleaning it up now.

(Devika Singh (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	A barnstar for your links to the I&O Assessment page! Dr Ashton (talk) 21:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!!! that made my day :) (Devika Singh (talk) 03:38, 11 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Employee morale, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ...William 17:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Individual psychological assessment article

hey guys,

Here's what I think you should do individually:

KierraA.- Work on the introduction (the top part of the page) and expand it with more information (& only information) on the stuff the professor wanted. Its best if you use the articles that can be found on the talk page, & to access them you have to log in though York's library with the 14 digit ID number found on the back of your York ID

Devika - Use one of the articles on the talk page to expand the Overview section (to access them you have to log in though York's library with the 14 digit ID number found on the back of your York ID) and scan the page for words that can be turned into links and then change them to links.

Oplmnq3 - I have replaced your edits with PAQ stuff (not sure if that was all of it though), and you should use the articles you placed on the talk page to expand that along with a Job Analysis section (use the article with the professor's pick beside for the job analysis).

-Xyzbb1253 (talk) 10:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Employee Morale

Dr Ashton has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Good Stub!

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Yummy

Thank You!!!!

Devika Singh has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

(Devika Singh (talk) 14:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

New Heading for the Poster

Click here to see it

Xyzbb1253 (talk) 06:31, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Employee morale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clients (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Employee Morale (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Employee Morale.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 19:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Employee Morale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 20:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]