User talk:Oplmnq3
| This is Oplmnq3's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello This is Taksim my first wikipedia page. I am quite excited to be on board with my fellow wikipedians, let the journey begin!
Oplmnq3 (talk) 19:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Taksim Chowdhury
2/17
[edit]I have two questions about the Reference section:
1. [take a look at this], and
2. Your code is showing! I think with the {{reflist}} markup you don't need the end tag.
Dr Ashton (talk) 19:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
3 more edits
[edit]Dear Taksim,
For next Tuesday, please make 3 more edits.
Dr Ashton (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Recent Pizza Edit
[edit]Regarding your recent edit, it was definitely constructive, but it sound a bit too much like you are having a conversation with someone rather than editing an encyclopedic article. I won't revert the edit, but keep in mind the tone you are using when you are editing. Have a good day!
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Oplmnq3 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! bojo1498 talk 20:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
490 Abstract
[edit]PSY 490 editors
the link below is what I've been working on for the Abstract. You may edit it or play around with it if you like
Xyzbb1253 (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- you can put in a sentence or two if you like or make changes to it too. Go ahead, add to it. What do u think our objective is?
Xyzbb1253 (talk) 18:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- ok that sounds great, and maybe we can incorporate the importance of the connection between psychology and business within the title. Xyzbb1253 (talk) 22:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Week 6
[edit]2.) The I/O Assessment article showed a few errors on their page. 1. The article is not cited correctly. 2. This article lacked the writing of an encyclopedia and was written more towards a biased essay. 3.It does not meet the needs of Wikipedia standards. 4. Links to other articles are needed as well because it is a big topic article. 5. The Article is written in a neutral point of view.
Oplmnq3 (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
week 6
[edit]Dear Taksim,
http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/pubs/summary.php?id=emplblty
What is this insitute? the report you link to is 16 years old, could that affect it's quality? why not a peer-reivewed journal article?
I basically see this reference and one sentence added. Am I correct? How does that address the improvement tags?
Dr Ashton (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Week 6
[edit]This week I have reviewed the Article called Occupational stress. The tags on this page indicated that it was too lengthy and it also lacked additional citations to reliable sources. What I have done is added 4 citation to a reliable source. Most of my sources were a form of peer reviewed journal article. I had also taken out a few sentences that were a little unclear and had tried to make the article up to Wikipedia satisfaction.
Oplmnq3 (talk) 00:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Industrial & Organizational Assessment
[edit]Hey Team hope everyone is having a productive weekend!
Let us begin with a couple of terms we should definitely cite, "Psychological Testing" and "Work Sampling" should be cited which I have done It is one of the tools for individual assessments. I have also noticed that the article is still written in a opinionated matter. The improvements can be made but therefore we should all be more careful on certain words to be used that may prevent the article to be continued to be written in this format. Including the main definition of Industrial/Organizational Assessment the two quotes are used to define a term, lets simplify the quote paraphrase it to a solid meaning and just cite the quote. What do you think?
Oplmnq3 (talk) 00:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- I think we should change this article because is not a topic but more of discussion post of various subject matters look here for more info. Xyzbb1253 (talk) 02:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
All of us should take a section and redo it and use the information already given as research foundation....some key terms and general statements that do not read as original thought needs to be cited sucha as assessing jobs and work (Areas of Assessment), PAQ (occupational analysis inventory. Will cite those suggested. --KierraA. (talk) 09:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KierraA. (talk • contribs)
week 7
[edit]Dear Taksim,
When I said links from other articles to the I & O Assessment page, I was speaking about the improvement tags. The tag I was referring to was about adding links to other Wikipedia articles to the I & O Assessment page. So, for next week, add 5 links from other Wikipedia pages to the I & O Assessment page.
Dr Ashton (talk) 21:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- and I just saw the message before mine; for next week, fix that too. Dr Ashton (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Dr. Ashton my apologies for understanding the 2nd half of our assignment for this week incorrectly. I had went back and added I/O assessment link to 5 Other Wikipedia articles. So I had corrected that, and I also took care of the article I referenced for one of the pages according to the bot. Thank you again for your input.
Oplmnq3 (talk) 22:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- I need the articles into which you inserted the links to I/O Assessment. Dr Ashton (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Sources I chose that Will help the Assessment Page
[edit]Assessing Good Qualities and Characteristics of Future employees
Group Work and Peer Assessment
Job Satisfaction and Human Resources
Job Creativity and Improvement
Hopefully some of these Peer Reviewed Articles can bring in some Strong Structure to our new and Edited I/O assessment Page.
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Minor barnstar |
| Links to the I/O Assessment page. Dr Ashton (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC) |
Individual psychological assessment article
[edit]Hey guys,
Here what I think you should do individually:
- KierraA.- Work on the introduction (the top part of the page) and expand it with more information (& only information) on the stuff the professor wanted. Its best if you use the articles that can be found on the talk page, & to access them you have to log in though York's library with the 14 digit ID number found on the back of your York ID
- Devika - Use one of the articles on the talk page to expand the Overview section (to access them you have to log in though York's library with the 14 digit ID number found on the back of your York ID) and scan the page for words that can be turned into links and then change them to links.
- Oplmnq3 - I have replaced your edits with PAQ stuff (not sure if that was all of it though), and you should use the articles you placed on the talk page to expand that along with a Job Analysis section (use the article with the professor's pick beside for the job analysis)
-Xyzbb1253 (talk) 10:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
PAQ
[edit]
Dr Ashton has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Good Stub!
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
April 1st Assignment
[edit]A. Read the Good Article Criteria and apply it to your stub article
i. identify 5 improvement needs to your stub article which will move it towards good article quality ii. develop a timeline between now and the end of the semester outlining the stages to move your stub article from where it is to your goal.
5 Improvements of Stub Article
[edit]Dr. Ashton, after reviewing many ideas to figure out what I need to do to have my article accepted by Wikipedia are a number of thing such as,
1.) Connect the idea of "PAQ" to other Wikipedia articles. (Other Human resource and Job analysis concepts tie in with the method of PAQ so I should expand on involving some terms on the appropriate pages.
2.) Find my peer reviewed articles and studies to show that PAQ is a important method not only utilized by I/O Psychologist but other hiring departments.
3.) I want to attach a link with a PAQ Form but that has been deleted because of Wikipedia regulations, So I will attach more links to give an example of a PAQ template.
4.) Updating and showing new organizations that use PAQ in their department (example, Yahoo, Google, Other big named fortune 500 companies to show the popularity.)
5.) Keep adding appropriate context to keep the pages competitive edge.
Outline of Stub article meeting Goal
- Within the midway of April my goal is to keep the article stable with other articles. (Having the freedom of writing almost anything to improve an article can also confuse readers by putting work that is not in comparison to the article.)
- I would like the quality of my writing to improve and be well written.
- Keep a sharp appropriateness of the images provided with the article. (I had an issue posting a template of Position analysis questionnaire I need to find the correct context in posting an image to show others what the PAQA method is asking for)
- I want to expand the article by adding other Wikipedia links to my page. The more links added gives it more of a chance other individuals/wikipedians can have the opportunity to review my article and post comments on the talk page.
Oplmnq3 (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)