User talk:Derfel73
Welcome!
Hello, Derfel73, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! - 2/0 (cont.) 22:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Finlad kingdome 800.svg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Finlad kingdome 800.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Orphans
[edit]I've declined your speedy on the Orphanage Association thing, as I felt there was enough content to establish what it was about. I've tidied it up a bit and tagged it 'unreferenced'. It may still fail on notability, but I'm leaving it for the moment to give them a chance to improve it. Peridon (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Same again, more or less. Those tags content and context are for really short things like 'St Marks is a church.' or 'Bloggs.com.uk'. Another one that catches people out is 'nonsense'. That's for things like 'yhtyfjhkjljk' or stuff so weird that even a Surrealist poet would reject it. Peridon (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for telling me; I shall be more careful in future. Derfel73 (talk) 20:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- No probs. Have a read of WP:CSD - I used to keep a copy open when I started tagging. Only takes a moment to check the actual definition. I still refer sometimes to it to check that I'm deleting something for the right reason... Peridon (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Seeds
[edit]That would have been better as 'content', as that one mentions web links. Context fitted, though. Sometimes both do. Sometimes a not-notable can be a spam at the same time. I used to hit them with both just in case. Don't put content and context together, though. Peridon (talk) 11:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: How to get rid of antivirus center
[edit]Hello Derfel73. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of How to get rid of antivirus center, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is not vandalism. It's a violation of WP:NOTHOWTO, but that's not a speedy reason. The PROD is the right way to deal with it. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for notifying me, "vandalism" didn't quite seem to fit at the time as well, so I appreciate you telling the correct procedure should I happen upon such an article again. Derfel73 (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- If you are going to do New Page Patrol (which is a very good and useful thing to do) it is worth reading WP:CSD carefully, particularly the definitions and the section "Non-criteria". There is good advice for speedy taggers from an experienced admin at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for notifying me, "vandalism" didn't quite seem to fit at the time as well, so I appreciate you telling the correct procedure should I happen upon such an article again. Derfel73 (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Operation Kita route.svg
[edit]Hi, Thanks a lot for developing this map - I've just added it to the Operation Kita article and it looks great. Cheers, Nick-D (talk) 04:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Your very welcome, though when I look at it, the text doesn't seem big enough to be easily read (in the article at least); I think that's something I'll try and improve. Derfel73 (talk) 09:24, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for improving this further. I'm going to be nominating for article for FA status, so this was well timed as well :) Regards, Nick-D (talk) 08:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]For File:Archaic globalization.svg. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Your very welcome; though it wasn't all too difficult or time-consuming. Derfel73 (talk) 16:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Uploading images to Commons.
[edit]Hey, I've noticed you're doing a lot of awesome work on the Graphic Lab! Keep it up! I was just wondering if you knew about uploading images to Wikimedia Commons? Images that are in the public domain or created under a free license can be uploaded there. I've noticed that some of the images you've worked on and uploaded are eligible to be in Commons, that way articles in other languages could use the images without having to re-upload them. If you'd like to attempt moving them over yourself, please see Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons. And it would cut down on the work of the people transferring the images over if you could upload all eligible files you've worked on to the Commons in the future. :) -MissMJ (talk) 22:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- I shall certainly try to do so in future. Derfel73 (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thank you for resizing the image so quickly. Cheers. --Meno25 (talk) 18:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Could you please convert the PDF in this document to SVG format and name it as File:West Bengal general elections, 2011 - Results (by district).svg. Thanking you in advance. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 04:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Mallian Campaign Maps
[edit]Are those maps close to being done?SteveMooreSmith3 (talk) 07:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done; Be sure to point out any thing that needs to be improved on the maps! Derfel73 (talk) 13:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
[edit]Hi Derfel73. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Emil Inc., a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because of credible claims of notability with songs/albums produced. Take it to PROD or AfD if you must. -- Alexf(talk) 12:25, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 08:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Derfel73 (talk) 08:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 23:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 23:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
[edit]Thank you for the star :) And thanks to all voice actors who created spoken articles. Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC) |
Thank you for your efforts so far; I have replied there. J Milburn (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Abkhazia-South Ossetia recognition map
[edit]Hi, thanks for your update of File:Abkhazia-South Ossetia recognition.svg a while ago. I've had a go at updating this myself with the addition of Tuvalu, first recognising Abkhazia and then both, using the country calls in the header section. But it appears that my method leaves 2 dots for Vanuatu. I was wondering if you would be able to have a look at this, and maybe point out where I went wrong. Cheers, Zangar (talk) 14:06, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
[edit]
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Derfel73! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Map Request
[edit]Hi, could you help me to finish my request in Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop now or later ?
Because I need it in a hurry, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 12:14, 26 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeshintaChandra (talk • contribs) 12:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Let me know if it needs changing/improving! Derfel73 (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the picture. But I need some changing. Could you please just make the image similiar like the File:Miss Universe 2010 Map.svg image ? And also please put the ranking inside the map, not outside the map, just like the File:Miss Universe 2010 Map.svg image. Oh, and please included ALL Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 participant countries.
Please divided the ranking as these :
- W (South Korea)
- 1st RU (France)
- 2nd RU (Russia)
- 3rd RU (Indonesia)
- 4th RU (India)
- 6-7 (Canada, Ukraine)
- 8-19 (England, Estonia, Hungary, South Korea, Mongolia, Nepal, Netherlands, Puerto Rico, Sweden, USA, Venezuela, Vietnam)
- 20-47 (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Cameroon, China, Denmark, Finland, Guam, Hong Kong, Ireland, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Malaysia, Mali, Mexico, Moldova, Panama, Philippines, Portugal, Romania, Scotland, Singapore, Tahiti, Taiwan, Thailand, Tibet)
Put these countries with different colors according to their rankings.
And for these rankings, please used the same colors as the colors that was used in the File:Miss Universe 2010 Map.svg image.
Thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 15:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Don't forget to put England with different color with Scotland, because UK sent two delegates to this pageant, England and Scotland. England should be put the color rank 8-19, while Scotland should be put the color rank 20-47, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 15:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Colors :
- W (Dark Blue)
- 1st RU (Light Blue)
- 2nd RU (Dark Green)
- 3rd RU (Light Green)
- 4th RU (Yellow)
- 6-7 (Orange)
- 8-19 (Pink)
- 20-47 (Dark Pink)
Use the same color from the File:Miss Universe 2010 Map.svg image, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done! I've coloured it as you requested; note: I am aware that Tibet needs its own border; I'm working on that. Derfel73 (talk) 16:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Here Tibet border in this image . Oh, and please make some corrections again. Please make the ranking box smaller, and also some territories that was being circled...the circle was too big, please make the circle smaller just like the File:Miss Universe 2010 Map.svg.
And please change the ranking. It should be listed as "W" not "1st" for the winner. and it should be listed as "1st RU", "2nd RU", "3rd RU", "4th RU", not "1 RU", "2 RU", "3 RU", "4 RU". The "RU" words should be listed as capital letter. Sorry for bothering, and thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 16:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
A little corrections again, please made the small countries and territories such as Singapore, Guam, Tahiti circle lines clearer. Also, please made the Tibet border line clearer, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 17:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
I thinks that is enough. Once again, thanks for finishing my request, and sorry for bothering you. DeshintaChandra (talk) 17:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Derfel73 (talk) 18:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
New request
[edit]Hi, I made a new request in Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop again, would you mind to check it out ? Please finish the request as soon as possible, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 03:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
For the map that I requested to you last time (Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 map), please put Dark Grey color to the non-participant countries, and make sure to include some small islands in the Carribean and Pacific Ocean even though most of them did not participated in the pageant. Please also make sure to include the three African small Islands (Mauritius, Seychelles, and Comoros) with dark grey color on them. Also, please make Guam and Tahiti circle lines as small as Hong Kong and Singapore circle lines, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Oh, and make sure to make the circle lines for the Caribbean Islands, Pacific Ocean's Islands, and the three African small Islands (Mauritius, Seychelles, Comoros) as small as Singapore and Hong Kong circle lines, too. Thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 10:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Correction : Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 participating countries and territories and results map
[edit]Hi, please also put dark grey color to non-participant countries in this image, thanks. :) DeshintaChandra (talk) 16:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Correction : Miss Universe 2011 participating countries and territories and results map
[edit]Hi, sorry for bothering. Kosovo should be colored as pink because Kosovo was ranked 11-16, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 17:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
New Request : Miss Supranational 2011 participating countries and territories and results
[edit]Hi, I made a new request again in Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop, please made it as soon as possible, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 03:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
New request : Miss International 2010 map
[edit]Hi, I have a new request again in Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop, please make it as soon as possible, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 10:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Could you please finish my latest request ? Thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 15:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Correction : Miss Supranational 2011 participations
[edit]Hello, please make a correction in this map. Israel should be put as Dark Pink (Red) because she participated in the pageant, but did not placed and was ranked 21-70, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 15:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Irael is already the required colour; though as it's a small colour, it's hard to make out. Derfel73 (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Oh, sorry about that. DeshintaChandra (talk) 10:21, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Requests
[edit]Hi, I'm sorry if you felt being bothered. I just wanna tell you that I will request maps to you until the Miss Earth 2011 pageant is finish.
Here is my next map requests :
Would you mind to do these requests for me ? I mean I will each of these requests these one time per day, then I will request another one after you finish the previous one. It's that okay for you ? DeshintaChandra (talk) 10:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
And please make sure to check in Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop, because I have a new map request again. It was Miss Earth 2010 map request. DeshintaChandra (talk) 11:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, please make sure to check Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop, I requested Miss Supranational 2010 map in there, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 09:56, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- Feel free to make multiple requests at the Graphic Lab, then I can do them all in one batch, though I may not be able to do so until next weekend; I apologize for not having dealt with this request sooner. Derfel73 (talk) 17:27, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh, that's okay, you've done hard. So I can make multiple requests in there ? I thought it allowed to made one request only. Anyway, thanks for the request. DeshintaChandra (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Hi, please make sure to check Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop, I requested map to you in there, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 17:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Eurasia Union map
[edit]Great work. I think Mongolia needs to be shown as a prospective future member. Would you be able to update the map? --Nug (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sure; I'll occasionally look at the article to see if an update is necessary (though that might not be for quite a while), but feel free to leave a message if the map needs changing. Derfel73 (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
WTO map changes
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you have the skills to add Russia to the map of members. Would you also be so kind as to do the same with Montenegro and Samoa, who've also acceded? Many thanks in advance. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 16:12, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Done! Thanks for pointing that out. Derfel73 (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks. Btw, are you aware that Vanuatu is also a recent accession? I've only just seen this and updated the number of members to 157. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 13:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, the map further down in the article remains severely outdated. I'm sorry to plague you with this, but i lack the skills necessary to facilitate the changes required to bring the map up to speed with current events. I would be very grateful for any assistance you could provide.--Macarenses (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
MOTDs (This space for rent)
[edit]You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 19:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
File:World Organization of the Scout Movement map.svg
[edit]Hello Derfel73, there is a Sudan-shaped country swimming in the Indian Ocean on this world map. Could you help me out by removing it? Thank you! --ComQuat (talk) 23:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Can't believe I didn't notice it when I originally uploaded the map! All sorted now. Derfel73 (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! --ComQuat (talk) 20:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Miss World 2011 Map.png
[edit]Hi, long time no see. There is error in this image, the ranking for the orange color should be "4-7", not "3-7". And Japan's color shouldn't be pink, because Japan did not made into the Top 15. Please for your help, thanks. DeshintaChandra (talk) 05:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:Battle of New Haven.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
[edit]→ A man must be excessively stupid, as well as uncharitable, who believes there is no virtue but on his own side.
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.
Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
[edit]Hi Derfel73,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Emperor series
[edit]Template:Emperor series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Scoria Point Corner, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scoria Point Corner, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hog Farm Talk 05:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Six Mile Corner, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six Mile Corner, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hog Farm Talk 05:32, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Peak, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peak, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hog Farm Talk 05:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Berea, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Berea, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berea, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Gorham, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gorham, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorham, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Urbana, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urbana, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urbana, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of North Valley City, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Valley City, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Valley City, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Koldok, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Koldok, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koldok, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Daily, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daily, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Cuba, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cuba, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuba, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Comstock, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comstock, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comstock, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Tilden, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tilden, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilden, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Niles, North Dakota for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niles, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niles, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)