User talk:DemonymsPlayer

Welcome!

Hi DemonymsPlayer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Segala Island, Eritrea (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing is poor. Wikipedia cannot be used as reference, and others sources don't establish notability. See WP:GEOLAND. Prose also needs serious attention before resubmitting. Every word is capitalised and much of it is unreadable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Segala Island, Eritrea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Segala Island, Eritrea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DemonymsPlayer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 12:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pulau Bunibelle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pulau Bunibelle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thingofme (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 12:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

February 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. In particular, please read MOS:CAPS, and avoid inappropriate capitalisation of the first letter of a word. David Biddulph (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did a little work on Draft:Segala Island, Eritrea, fixing up a reference. The above comment likely relates to this draft you created. Every Single Word Is Capitalized, but that's just not the way it's done. It's off-putting, and may prejudice reviewers against the article. If you want to increase the chances of the draft passing into a bona fide article, I suggest you take the time to fix this aspect of the draft for starters. If you do that, I'll be more inclined to spend some time doing copyediting on it. _signed,Willondon (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you ignored my advice above. Instead of making that correction, or any improvements, you just re-submitted it for review. Good luck with that. Doesn't really encourage any other editors that might help to whip it in to shape. _signed,Willondon (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Seminole - JWES Wars"

Seminole - JWES Wars, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. — Mhawk10 (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personal info

Hey! I noticed that you've disclosed a lot of personal info on Wikipedia, including your real name and where you go to school. Are you aware of the possible consequences of doing so (such as harassment and people stalking you IRL)? If not I would request that you delete any personally identifiable info you have posted on Wikipedia and request it be oversighted by following the instructions at WP:OVERSIGHT. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 03:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Center Lake Park moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Center Lake Park, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 04:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before submitting, it should also have the expected style of not having so many words in a sentence capitalized. Only certain words should be capitalized. _signed,Willondon (talk) 05:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center Lake Park (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center Lake Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Center Lake Park, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 7506 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NGC 7506, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 01:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center Lake Park (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Bing videos, "contact us" pages of companies, Yelp, and Tripadvisor are all unreliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center Lake Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Center Lake Park, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 02:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ingenuity it sounds like you want to delete my progression towards [[Draft:Center Lake Park DemonymsPlayer (talk) 11:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Segala Island, Eritrea (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Poorly sourced, and the sources cited are insufficient to establish notability.

Also, the language, punctuation, etc. are so poor as to make this barely legible; parts are pure gobbledegook.

These issues have already been highlighted in the previous decline. Please do not resubmit until all the matters have been fully addressed. Thank you, --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Segala Island, Eritrea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Segala Island, Eritrea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:57, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flagler Trail for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flagler Trail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flagler Trail until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MB 02:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Horseshoe Lake' Florida

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Horseshoe Lake' Florida, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pulau Bunibelle

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pulau Bunibelle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Segala Island, Eritrea

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Segala Island, Eritrea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Segala Island, Eritrea

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Segala Island".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Center Lake Park

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Center Lake Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Center Lake Park

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Center Lake Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NGC 7506

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NGC 7506, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NGC 7506

Hello, DemonymsPlayer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NGC 7506".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]